Re-Evaluating Clinical Outcomes for AVM Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Q2 Medicine Progress in neurological surgery Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-05-16 DOI:10.1159/000493073
Daniel A Tonetti, Bradley A Gross
{"title":"Re-Evaluating Clinical Outcomes for AVM Stereotactic Radiosurgery.","authors":"Daniel A Tonetti,&nbsp;Bradley A Gross","doi":"10.1159/000493073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional outcome measures after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) have focused predominantly on angiographic obliteration and general neurologic complications. Several grading scales attempting to predict the outcome for specific patients have previously been proposed and validated, and are outlined here. These have largely been based on both AVM and patient characteristics and attempt to predict obliteration. However, the most practical and clinically oriented goal in the management of AVMs is the prospective avoidance of neurological sequelae manifesting in the form of stroke or death, regardless of AVM obliteration. Long-term outcomes following SRS have demonstrated stroke or death rates of 1.5-2.0% per year for the first 5 years after SRS, followed by 0.2-0.4% annual risk thereafter. This focus on the avoidance of stroke or death is additionally crucial for direct comparisons to non-interventional natural history data. Here, we discuss the history of outcomes data on radiosurgery for AVMs and propose a re-evaluation of clinical outcome that is of most utility to the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":39342,"journal":{"name":"Progress in neurological surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000493073","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in neurological surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000493073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Traditional outcome measures after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) have focused predominantly on angiographic obliteration and general neurologic complications. Several grading scales attempting to predict the outcome for specific patients have previously been proposed and validated, and are outlined here. These have largely been based on both AVM and patient characteristics and attempt to predict obliteration. However, the most practical and clinically oriented goal in the management of AVMs is the prospective avoidance of neurological sequelae manifesting in the form of stroke or death, regardless of AVM obliteration. Long-term outcomes following SRS have demonstrated stroke or death rates of 1.5-2.0% per year for the first 5 years after SRS, followed by 0.2-0.4% annual risk thereafter. This focus on the avoidance of stroke or death is additionally crucial for direct comparisons to non-interventional natural history data. Here, we discuss the history of outcomes data on radiosurgery for AVMs and propose a re-evaluation of clinical outcome that is of most utility to the patient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
再评价AVM立体定向放射治疗的临床效果。
脑动静脉畸形(AVMs)立体定向放射手术(SRS)后的传统结果测量主要集中在血管造影闭塞和一般神经系统并发症。几个分级量表试图预测特定患者的结果,以前已经提出和验证,并在这里概述。这些很大程度上是基于AVM和患者特征,并试图预测闭塞。然而,在AVM的治疗中,最实际和临床导向的目标是预期避免以中风或死亡形式表现的神经系统后遗症,无论AVM是否闭塞。SRS后的长期结果显示,SRS后的前5年中风或死亡率为每年1.5-2.0%,此后每年风险为0.2-0.4%。这种对避免中风或死亡的关注对于与非干预性自然历史数据的直接比较也至关重要。在这里,我们讨论了avm放射手术的结果数据的历史,并提出了对患者最有用的临床结果的重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Published since 1966, this series has become universally recognized as the most significant group of books serving neurological surgeons. Volumes feature contributions from distinguished international surgeons, who brilliantly review the literature from the perspective of their own personal experience. The result is a series of works providing critical distillations of developments of central importance to the theory and practice of neurological surgery.
期刊最新文献
Neuromodulation for Facial Pain Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Facial Pain Using Conventional Devices: Indications and Results. Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Headache Syndromes. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Facial Pain. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Facial Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1