To Rate or Not to Rate? Autonomic Response and Psychological Well-being of Employees During Performance Review.

Q2 Nursing Health Care Manager Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI:10.1097/HCM.0000000000000257
Michela Balconi, Irene Venturella, Giulia Fronda, Daniela de Filippis, Emanuela Salati, Maria Elide Vanutelli
{"title":"To Rate or Not to Rate? Autonomic Response and Psychological Well-being of Employees During Performance Review.","authors":"Michela Balconi,&nbsp;Irene Venturella,&nbsp;Giulia Fronda,&nbsp;Daniela de Filippis,&nbsp;Emanuela Salati,&nbsp;Maria Elide Vanutelli","doi":"10.1097/HCM.0000000000000257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organizational research started including neurosciences exploring pivotal phenomena and promoting organizational well-being. Leadership was investigated by assessing psychophysiological responses during performance review characterized by narrative or quantitative assessments and their effects on employees' well-being. As is known, rating could be perceived as threatening for employees' ranking and status perception, leading to avoidant behaviors.</p><p><strong>Design and methodology: </strong>Here, manager-employee dyads were assigned to 2 conditions: in the nonrate scenario, managers were asked to describe the employee's performance; in the rate one, they had to provide a quantitative rating. Skin conductance level and response and heart rate indices were continuously recorded.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Dyads in nonrate condition showed higher arousal-related responses (skin conductance level and skin conductance response), perhaps highlighting an increased engagement triggered by a rewarding exchange. Conversely, in rate condition, employees showed higher heart rate, usually related to negative and stressful conditions, and avoidant behaviors.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Results are discussed for their possible applications to employees' well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":46018,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Manager","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/HCM.0000000000000257","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Manager","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0000000000000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Organizational research started including neurosciences exploring pivotal phenomena and promoting organizational well-being. Leadership was investigated by assessing psychophysiological responses during performance review characterized by narrative or quantitative assessments and their effects on employees' well-being. As is known, rating could be perceived as threatening for employees' ranking and status perception, leading to avoidant behaviors.

Design and methodology: Here, manager-employee dyads were assigned to 2 conditions: in the nonrate scenario, managers were asked to describe the employee's performance; in the rate one, they had to provide a quantitative rating. Skin conductance level and response and heart rate indices were continuously recorded.

Findings: Dyads in nonrate condition showed higher arousal-related responses (skin conductance level and skin conductance response), perhaps highlighting an increased engagement triggered by a rewarding exchange. Conversely, in rate condition, employees showed higher heart rate, usually related to negative and stressful conditions, and avoidant behaviors.

Originality/value: Results are discussed for their possible applications to employees' well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价还是不评价?绩效考核中员工的自主反应与心理健康。
组织研究开始包括探索关键现象和促进组织幸福感的神经科学。本研究以叙述性或定量评估的方式评估员工在绩效评估过程中的心理生理反应,以及这些反应对员工幸福感的影响。众所周知,评分会对员工的排名和地位感知产生威胁,从而导致回避行为。设计和方法:在这里,经理-员工二人组被分配到两种情况:在非率情景中,经理被要求描述员工的表现;在速率1中,他们必须提供一个定量的评级。连续记录皮肤电导水平、反应及心率指标。研究结果:非速率条件下的双组表现出更高的唤醒相关反应(皮肤电导水平和皮肤电导反应),可能突出了奖励交换引发的参与度增加。相反,在消极和压力条件下,员工表现出更高的心率,通常与消极和压力条件以及回避行为有关。原创性/价值:讨论结果对员工福祉的可能应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Manager
Health Care Manager HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Health Care Manager (HCM), provides practical, applied management information for managers in institutional health care settings. It is a quarterly journal, horizontally integrated and cutting across all functional lines, written for every person who manages the work of others in any health care setting. This journal presents practical day-to-day management advice as well as research studies addressing current issues in health care management. Its intent is the strengthening management and supervisory skills of its readers and increasing their understanding of today"s health care environment. HCM is searchable through PubMed.
期刊最新文献
Letter from the Publisher. Ethical Issues and the Electronic Health Record. An Analysis of Restructuring Orientation to Enhance Nurse Retention. Building an Ethical Organizational Culture. Fall Prevention Conceptual Framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1