Social avoidance in depression: A study using a social decision-making task.

IF 4.6 1区 心理学 Q1 Medicine Journal of abnormal psychology Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI:10.1037/abn0000415
Gabriela Fernández-Theoduloz, Valentina Paz, Eliana Nicolaisen-Sobesky, Alfonso Pérez, Abraham P Buunk, Álvaro Cabana, Victoria B Gradin
{"title":"Social avoidance in depression: A study using a social decision-making task.","authors":"Gabriela Fernández-Theoduloz,&nbsp;Valentina Paz,&nbsp;Eliana Nicolaisen-Sobesky,&nbsp;Alfonso Pérez,&nbsp;Abraham P Buunk,&nbsp;Álvaro Cabana,&nbsp;Victoria B Gradin","doi":"10.1037/abn0000415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression significantly affects interpersonal functioning. Social avoidance may play an important role in depression, limiting opportunities and social skills acquisition, contributing to the maintenance of social difficulties. In the last few years, the need for studying social interactions using interactive tasks has been highlighted. This study investigated social avoidance in unmedicated depressed (n = 26) and matched healthy control (n = 26) participants, using a novel computerized social decision-making task (the TEAM task). In this task, participants choose between a social option (playing in a team with a coplayer) and an individual option (playing alone). Although the social option is more profitable from a material point of view, it can also be challenging because of social comparison and guilt feelings for failing the team. It was found that the higher the rank of the coplayer, the stronger the negative emotions (shame, guilt) reported by participants and the more they opted for the individual option. Depressed participants reported significantly less positive (happiness) and more negative (shame, guilt, disappointment) feelings regarding the task. Importantly, depressed participants chose the individual option significantly more often than controls, which led to lower gains in this group. Furthermore, as the task progressed, controls selected the individual option less often, whereas depressed participants selected the individual option more often. Our findings illustrate the importance of social avoidance in depression and how this behavior can lead to negative consequences. They also highlight the role of social comparison and guilt-related processes in underlying social avoidance in depression. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":14793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of abnormal psychology","volume":"128 3","pages":"234-244"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of abnormal psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000415","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Depression significantly affects interpersonal functioning. Social avoidance may play an important role in depression, limiting opportunities and social skills acquisition, contributing to the maintenance of social difficulties. In the last few years, the need for studying social interactions using interactive tasks has been highlighted. This study investigated social avoidance in unmedicated depressed (n = 26) and matched healthy control (n = 26) participants, using a novel computerized social decision-making task (the TEAM task). In this task, participants choose between a social option (playing in a team with a coplayer) and an individual option (playing alone). Although the social option is more profitable from a material point of view, it can also be challenging because of social comparison and guilt feelings for failing the team. It was found that the higher the rank of the coplayer, the stronger the negative emotions (shame, guilt) reported by participants and the more they opted for the individual option. Depressed participants reported significantly less positive (happiness) and more negative (shame, guilt, disappointment) feelings regarding the task. Importantly, depressed participants chose the individual option significantly more often than controls, which led to lower gains in this group. Furthermore, as the task progressed, controls selected the individual option less often, whereas depressed participants selected the individual option more often. Our findings illustrate the importance of social avoidance in depression and how this behavior can lead to negative consequences. They also highlight the role of social comparison and guilt-related processes in underlying social avoidance in depression. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑郁症的社会回避:一项使用社会决策任务的研究。
抑郁症显著影响人际功能。社交回避可能在抑郁症中发挥重要作用,限制了机会和社交技能的获得,有助于维持社交困难。在过去的几年里,使用交互式任务来研究社会互动的必要性已经得到了强调。本研究使用一种新的计算机化社会决策任务(TEAM任务)调查了未服药的抑郁症(n = 26)和匹配的健康对照(n = 26)参与者的社会回避。在这个任务中,参与者可以选择社交选项(与同伴一起组队)和个人选项(单独组队)。虽然从物质的角度来看,社交选择更有利可图,但它也可能具有挑战性,因为社交比较和对团队失败的内疚感。研究发现,合作伙伴的级别越高,参与者报告的负面情绪(羞耻、内疚)就越强烈,他们就越倾向于选择个人选项。抑郁的参与者对任务的积极感受(快乐)明显减少,消极感受(羞耻、内疚、失望)明显增加。重要的是,抑郁的参与者比对照组更经常地选择个人选项,这导致这一组的收益更低。此外,随着任务的进行,控制者选择单个选项的频率更低,而抑郁的参与者选择单个选项的频率更高。我们的研究结果说明了社交回避在抑郁症中的重要性,以及这种行为如何导致负面后果。他们还强调了社会比较和内疚相关过程在抑郁症中潜在的社会回避中的作用。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2019 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Abnormal Psychology® publishes articles on basic research and theory in the broad field of abnormal behavior, its determinants, and its correlates. The following general topics fall within its area of major focus: - psychopathology—its etiology, development, symptomatology, and course; - normal processes in abnormal individuals; - pathological or atypical features of the behavior of normal persons; - experimental studies, with human or animal subjects, relating to disordered emotional behavior or pathology; - sociocultural effects on pathological processes, including the influence of gender and ethnicity; and - tests of hypotheses from psychological theories that relate to abnormal behavior.
期刊最新文献
Integrated multiplexed assays of variant effect reveal cis-regulatory determinants of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene expression. The wolf. Supplemental Material for Self-Esteem and Psychosis in Daily Life: An Experience Sampling Study Supplemental Material for Multimethod Assessment of Pubertal Timing and Associations With Internalizing Psychopathology in Early Adolescent Girls Supplemental Material for The Impact of Punishment on Cognitive Control in a Clinical Population Characterized by Heightened Punishment Sensitivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1