Determining the reliability of craniocervical flexion test in asymptomatic individuals.

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal Pub Date : 2018-06-01 Epub Date: 2018-04-06 DOI:10.1142/S101370251850004X
Seema Kotwani, D N Bid, Dinesh Ghatamaneni, Khalid A Alahmari, Thangamani Ramalingam, S Paul Silvian
{"title":"Determining the reliability of craniocervical flexion test in asymptomatic individuals.","authors":"Seema Kotwani,&nbsp;D N Bid,&nbsp;Dinesh Ghatamaneni,&nbsp;Khalid A Alahmari,&nbsp;Thangamani Ramalingam,&nbsp;S Paul Silvian","doi":"10.1142/S101370251850004X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inter-rater reliability of the craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) has not been established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities of the CCFT in asymptomatic subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty asymptomatic subjects were randomly selected for the study. The CCFT was measured on each subject by two testers for inter-rater reliability and by one of the testers after a gap of seven days for the intra-rater reliability. Before testing, the participants were trained for the movement and compensations were corrected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CCFT has high inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient <math><mo>=</mo></math> 0.907, standard error of mean <math><mo>=</mo></math> 0.735) and high intra-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient <math><mo>=</mo></math> 0.986, standard error of mean <math><mo>=</mo></math> 0.287). A Bland & Altman limits of agreement analysis has confirmed the high inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of the test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CCFT has high inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities in asymptomatic subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S101370251850004X","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S101370251850004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: The inter-rater reliability of the craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) has not been established.

Objective: To investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities of the CCFT in asymptomatic subjects.

Methods: Sixty asymptomatic subjects were randomly selected for the study. The CCFT was measured on each subject by two testers for inter-rater reliability and by one of the testers after a gap of seven days for the intra-rater reliability. Before testing, the participants were trained for the movement and compensations were corrected.

Results: The CCFT has high inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.907, standard error of mean = 0.735) and high intra-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.986, standard error of mean = 0.287). A Bland & Altman limits of agreement analysis has confirmed the high inter- and intra-rater reliabilities of the test.

Conclusion: The CCFT has high inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities in asymptomatic subjects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定无症状个体颅颈屈曲试验的可靠性。
背景:颅颈屈曲试验(CCFT)的内部可靠性尚未建立。目的:探讨CCFT在无症状人群中的内部信度和内部信度。方法:随机选取60例无症状者进行研究。CCFT在每个受试者上由两名测试者进行评估间信度测试,并在间隔7天后由一名测试者进行评估内信度测试。在测试前,对参与者进行运动训练和补偿纠正。结果:CCFT具有较高的等级间信度(类内相关系数= 0.907,平均标准误差= 0.735)和较高的等级内信度(类内相关系数= 0.986,平均标准误差= 0.287)。Bland & Altman的协议分析极限证实了该测试的高内部和内部信度。结论:CCFT在无症状受试者中具有较高的信度和信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is the official journal of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited (HKPA Ltd). This peer-reviewed journal aims to contribute to and document the advancements in the principles and practice of physiotherapy in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is published annually and papers are categorized into research reports, treatment reports, technical reports, literature reviews, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Isokinetic evaluation of knee muscles and correlation of maximum torque of the extensors of the operated knee with thigh circumference in soccer players 2 years after ACL reconstruction: A cross-sectional study. Effectiveness of a standardised stroke upper extremity rehabilitation program with shortened Fugl-Meyer assessment stratification: A randomised controlled trial. Familiarity, attitudes, and barriers to exergame use in rehabilitation among healthcare practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Relationship between musculoskeletal factors in the shoulder and upper limb function in patients with stroke: A cross-sectional study. The effect of walking training intensity on regaining independent walking for sub-acute stroke patients: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1