Effect of muscle energy technique with and without strain-counterstrain technique in acute low back pain - A randomized clinical trial.

Pub Date : 2018-06-01 Epub Date: 2018-04-04 DOI:10.1142/S1013702518500051
Vivek Dineshbhai Patel, Charu Eapen, Zulfeequer Ceepee, Ramachandra Kamath
{"title":"Effect of muscle energy technique with and without strain-counterstrain technique in acute low back pain - A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Vivek Dineshbhai Patel,&nbsp;Charu Eapen,&nbsp;Zulfeequer Ceepee,&nbsp;Ramachandra Kamath","doi":"10.1142/S1013702518500051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muscle energy technique (MET) and strain-counterstrain (SCS) technique are found to be effective as a sole treatment of acute low back pain (LBP), but the combined effect of these two techniques has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the added effect of SCS to MET in acute LBP patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this trial, 50 patients were randomly allocated to MET or MET-SCS group to receive the assigned two treatment sessions for two consecutive days. Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar range of motion (ROM) were recorded at baseline, after first and second session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the outcome measures showed statistically significant ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.05</mn></math> ) improvement in both the groups after second session. Between the groups, analysis showed no statistically significant difference ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>></mo> <mn>0.05</mn></math> ) after the first or second session.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The improvement after second treatment sessions was noted in pain, ROM, and disability in both the groups, but immediate effect was seen only on pain intensity after first treatment session. When compared between the groups, no added effect of SCS to MET was found in reducing pain and disability and increasing lumbar ROM in acute LBP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S1013702518500051","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702518500051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: Muscle energy technique (MET) and strain-counterstrain (SCS) technique are found to be effective as a sole treatment of acute low back pain (LBP), but the combined effect of these two techniques has not been evaluated.

Objective: The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the added effect of SCS to MET in acute LBP patients.

Methods: In this trial, 50 patients were randomly allocated to MET or MET-SCS group to receive the assigned two treatment sessions for two consecutive days. Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar range of motion (ROM) were recorded at baseline, after first and second session.

Results: All the outcome measures showed statistically significant ( p < 0.05 ) improvement in both the groups after second session. Between the groups, analysis showed no statistically significant difference ( p > 0.05 ) after the first or second session.

Conclusions: The improvement after second treatment sessions was noted in pain, ROM, and disability in both the groups, but immediate effect was seen only on pain intensity after first treatment session. When compared between the groups, no added effect of SCS to MET was found in reducing pain and disability and increasing lumbar ROM in acute LBP patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
肌肉能量技术在急性腰痛中的作用——一项随机临床试验。
背景:肌肉能量技术(MET)和应变反训练(SCS)技术被发现是治疗急性腰痛(LBP)的唯一有效方法,但这两种技术的联合效果尚未得到评估。目的:本随机临床试验旨在评估脊髓刺激系统(SCS)对急性LBP患者MET的补充作用。方法:在本试验中,50名患者被随机分配到MET或MET-SCS组,连续两天接受指定的两次治疗。在基线、第一次和第二次治疗后记录Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和Roland Morris残疾问卷(RMDQ)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、腰椎活动范围(ROM)。结果:第二次治疗后,两组的所有结果指标均显示出统计学上显著的改善(p0.05)。在第一次或第二次治疗后,分析显示两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)。结论:第二次治疗后,两组患者的疼痛、ROM和残疾均有改善,但仅在第一次治疗后的疼痛强度上有立竿见影的效果。当在两组之间进行比较时,在急性LBP患者中,未发现SCS对MET在减轻疼痛和残疾以及增加腰椎ROM方面的额外作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1