Functional ability and health status of community-dwelling late age elderly people with and without a history of falls

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal Pub Date : 2016-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.08.001
Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij PT, PhD , Patcharawan Suwannarat PT, PhD candidate , Lugkana Mato PT, PhD , Sugalya Amatachaya PT, PhD
{"title":"Functional ability and health status of community-dwelling late age elderly people with and without a history of falls","authors":"Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Patcharawan Suwannarat PT, PhD candidate ,&nbsp;Lugkana Mato PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Sugalya Amatachaya PT, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Obvious functional deterioration is demonstrated in elderly people aged 75 years and older. However, there is only little objective evidence relating to falls in these individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This cross-sectional study compared functional abilities and health status in the elderly age at least 75 years with no fall, single fall (1 fall), and multiple falls (≥2 falls) during the past 6 months. Furthermore, the study describes fall information of the participants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ninety participants (30 individuals/group) were interviewed for their health status and fall history within the past 6 months. Then they were objectively assessed in terms of their functional ability to conduct daily activities independently.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The findings indicated that the functional abilities of participants with multiple falls were significantly poorer, with the number of those requiring a walking device significantly greater than that in the other groups. These individuals reported loss of balance as a major factor for falls, whereas individuals with a single fall reported an environmental hazard as a common cause of falls.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Although the cross-sectional findings may be unable to clearly confirm the causal relationship of the outcomes, the data support the influence of intrinsic impairments and can be used to promote functional ability and minimise fall risk in these individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44774,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","volume":"34 ","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.08.001","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101370251500024X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background

Obvious functional deterioration is demonstrated in elderly people aged 75 years and older. However, there is only little objective evidence relating to falls in these individuals.

Objective

This cross-sectional study compared functional abilities and health status in the elderly age at least 75 years with no fall, single fall (1 fall), and multiple falls (≥2 falls) during the past 6 months. Furthermore, the study describes fall information of the participants.

Methods

Ninety participants (30 individuals/group) were interviewed for their health status and fall history within the past 6 months. Then they were objectively assessed in terms of their functional ability to conduct daily activities independently.

Results

The findings indicated that the functional abilities of participants with multiple falls were significantly poorer, with the number of those requiring a walking device significantly greater than that in the other groups. These individuals reported loss of balance as a major factor for falls, whereas individuals with a single fall reported an environmental hazard as a common cause of falls.

Conclusion

Although the cross-sectional findings may be unable to clearly confirm the causal relationship of the outcomes, the data support the influence of intrinsic impairments and can be used to promote functional ability and minimise fall risk in these individuals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有和无跌倒史的社区居住老年老年人功能能力与健康状况
背景:在75岁及以上的老年人中表现出明显的功能退化。然而,与这些人跌倒有关的客观证据很少。目的比较75岁以上老年人在过去6个月内无跌倒、单次跌倒(1次跌倒)和多次跌倒(≥2次跌倒)的功能能力和健康状况。此外,研究描述了参与者的跌倒信息。方法对90名参与者(30人/组)进行6个月内的健康状况和跌倒史调查。然后对他们独立进行日常活动的功能能力进行客观评估。结果研究结果表明,多次跌倒的参与者的功能能力明显较差,需要步行装置的人数明显多于其他组。这些人报告失去平衡是跌倒的主要因素,而只跌倒过一次的人报告环境危害是跌倒的常见原因。尽管横断面研究结果可能无法清楚地证实结果的因果关系,但数据支持内在损伤的影响,并可用于促进这些个体的功能能力和降低跌倒风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is the official journal of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited (HKPA Ltd). This peer-reviewed journal aims to contribute to and document the advancements in the principles and practice of physiotherapy in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal is published annually and papers are categorized into research reports, treatment reports, technical reports, literature reviews, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Level of self-efficacy among skill-based allied health students in the University of Santo Tomas-Enriched Virtual Mode of learning: A cross-sectional study. Physical therapy exercises for improving intermittent exotropia control post-strabismus surgery: A randomized controlled study Reliability and validity of modified upper limb neurodynamic tests in patients with cervical radiculopathy The test-induced warm-up effect on hamstring flexibility tests Effect of Kinesio taping versus mechanical cervical traction combined with physiotherapy program on chronic neck pain in young female university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1