Comparison of Different Techniques of Pancreatic Stump Management in Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

IF 0.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal Tumors Pub Date : 2019-02-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-27 DOI:10.1159/000489777
Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia, Samarth Durgam, Mario Masrur, Luis Fernando Gonzalez-Ciccarelli, Antonio Gangemi, Francesco M Bianco, Pier C Giulianotti
{"title":"Comparison of Different Techniques of Pancreatic Stump Management in Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy.","authors":"Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia,&nbsp;Samarth Durgam,&nbsp;Mario Masrur,&nbsp;Luis Fernando Gonzalez-Ciccarelli,&nbsp;Antonio Gangemi,&nbsp;Francesco M Bianco,&nbsp;Pier C Giulianotti","doi":"10.1159/000489777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various technical improvements have decreased the morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most feared complication, and the ideal technique for pancreatic reconstruction is undetermined. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors and incidence of POPF with different types of pancreatic stump management after robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent RAPD at the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System between September 2007 and January 2016. The cohort was divided based on the type of pancreatic stump management: pancreatic duct occlusion with cyanoacrylate glue (CG), pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), posterior pancreaticogastrostomy (PPG), and transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy (TPG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 69 patients: pancreatic duct occlusion with CG (<i>n</i> = 18), PJ (<i>n</i> = 12), PPG (<i>n</i> = 11), and TPG (<i>n</i> = 28). Pancreatic duct diameter < 3 mm and duct occlusion with CG were identified as risk factors for POPF (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The incidence of POPF was lower when TPG and PJ were performed (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reconstruction with PJ and TPG had better results compared to pancreatic duct occlusion with CG and PPG. However, TPG was the technique of choice and showed comparable results to PJ.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"5 3-4","pages":"68-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000489777","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000489777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Various technical improvements have decreased the morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most feared complication, and the ideal technique for pancreatic reconstruction is undetermined. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors and incidence of POPF with different types of pancreatic stump management after robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD).

Materials and methods: This study is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent RAPD at the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System between September 2007 and January 2016. The cohort was divided based on the type of pancreatic stump management: pancreatic duct occlusion with cyanoacrylate glue (CG), pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), posterior pancreaticogastrostomy (PPG), and transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy (TPG).

Results: The cohort included 69 patients: pancreatic duct occlusion with CG (n = 18), PJ (n = 12), PPG (n = 11), and TPG (n = 28). Pancreatic duct diameter < 3 mm and duct occlusion with CG were identified as risk factors for POPF (p < 0.05). The incidence of POPF was lower when TPG and PJ were performed (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Reconstruction with PJ and TPG had better results compared to pancreatic duct occlusion with CG and PPG. However, TPG was the technique of choice and showed comparable results to PJ.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术中胰腺残端处理不同技术的比较。
背景:各种技术的进步降低了胰十二指肠切除术后的发病率和死亡率。然而,术后胰瘘(POPF)是最可怕的并发症,理想的胰腺重建技术尚未确定。本研究的目的是确定机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(RAPD)后不同胰残端处理方式下POPF的危险因素和发生率。材料和方法:本研究是对2007年9月至2016年1月在伊利诺伊大学医院和健康科学系统接受RAPD的连续患者的回顾性研究。该队列根据胰腺残端处理类型分为:用氰基丙烯酸酯胶封堵胰管(CG)、胰空肠吻合术(PJ)、后胰胃造口术(PPG)和经胃胰胃造口术(TPG)。结果:纳入69例患者:胰管阻塞合并CG (n = 18)、PJ (n = 12)、PPG (n = 11)和TPG (n = 28)。胰管直径< 3mm和胰管阻塞合并CG是发生POPF的危险因素(p < 0.05)。行TPG和PJ时,POPF的发生率较低(p < 0.001)。结论:与CG和PPG封堵胰管相比,PJ和TPG重建胰管效果更好。然而,TPG是首选的技术,其结果与PJ相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal Tumors
Gastrointestinal Tumors GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Novel Urinary Biomarkers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in a Predominantly African American Population: A Case-Control Study. Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers. Association between Serum Zinc Levels and Clinicopathological Characteristics in Patients with Gastric Cancer. Mixed Neuroendocrine and Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasm of Pancreas: What Do We Know, What Have We Learnt? Mast Cell Sarcoma of Small Intestine, Early Diagnosis, and Good Prognosis: An Extremely Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1