Is it Selection or Socialization? Disentangling Peer Influences on Heavy Drinking and Marijuana Use Among Adolescents Whose Parents Received Brief Interventions.

IF 2 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2019-06-14 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1178221819852644
Sara J Becker, Kristine Marceau, Lynn Hernandez, Anthony Spirito
{"title":"Is it Selection or Socialization? Disentangling Peer Influences on Heavy Drinking and Marijuana Use Among Adolescents Whose Parents Received Brief Interventions.","authors":"Sara J Becker, Kristine Marceau, Lynn Hernandez, Anthony Spirito","doi":"10.1177/1178221819852644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study attempted to disentangle the effects of peer selection and socialization on heavy drinking and marijuana use among adolescents whose parents received 2 distinct brief interventions (BIs). It also examined whether the two BI models-Family Check-Up and Psychoeducation-had differential effects on peer processes. Parents were randomized to BI conditions and their adolescents (61% male, age 12-19 years) completed self-report measures of days of heavy drinking, days of marijuana use, and perceived peer substance involvement at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Separate cross-lagged panel models revealed evidence of selection and socialization for both heavy drinking and marijuana over the first 6 months and evidence of only selection over the subsequent 6 months. Consistent with prior studies, a less robust pattern of peer processes was found when simultaneously controlling for both heavy drinking and marijuana. Results highlight the need to examine multiple substances simultaneously and suggest that the BIs may have had protective effects on peer influences over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":22185,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","volume":"13 ","pages":"1178221819852644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c1/88/10.1177_1178221819852644.PMC6572885.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221819852644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study attempted to disentangle the effects of peer selection and socialization on heavy drinking and marijuana use among adolescents whose parents received 2 distinct brief interventions (BIs). It also examined whether the two BI models-Family Check-Up and Psychoeducation-had differential effects on peer processes. Parents were randomized to BI conditions and their adolescents (61% male, age 12-19 years) completed self-report measures of days of heavy drinking, days of marijuana use, and perceived peer substance involvement at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Separate cross-lagged panel models revealed evidence of selection and socialization for both heavy drinking and marijuana over the first 6 months and evidence of only selection over the subsequent 6 months. Consistent with prior studies, a less robust pattern of peer processes was found when simultaneously controlling for both heavy drinking and marijuana. Results highlight the need to examine multiple substances simultaneously and suggest that the BIs may have had protective effects on peer influences over time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是选择还是社会化?在父母接受过简短干预的青少年中,朋辈对酗酒和吸食大麻的影响是什么?
本研究试图区分同伴选择和社会化对父母接受了两种不同的简短干预(BIs)的青少年酗酒和吸食大麻的影响。研究还考察了两种简短干预模式--"家庭检查 "和 "心理教育"--是否对同伴过程产生了不同的影响。父母被随机分配到不同的 BI 条件中,他们的青少年(61% 为男性,年龄在 12-19 岁之间)在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时完成了关于大量饮酒天数、吸食大麻天数和感知到的同伴物质参与的自我报告测量。独立的交叉滞后面板模型显示,在最初的 6 个月中,有证据表明对大量饮酒和吸食大麻进行了选择和社会化,而在随后的 6 个月中,只有证据表明进行了选择。与之前的研究一致,当同时控制大量饮酒和吸食大麻时,发现同伴过程的模式不太稳健。研究结果凸显了同时研究多种物质的必要性,并表明随着时间的推移,商业智能可能会对同伴影响产生保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Substance Use Disorders on Suicidal Ideation, Planning, and Attempts: A Nationally Representative Study of Adolescents and Adults in the United States, 2020. Reconsidering the Terminology: Study Participants as "Subjects" or Not? Recovering Individuals' Feelings About Addict and Alcoholic as Stigmatized Terms: Implications for Treatment. Untrained Bystanders Administering Drone-Delivered Naloxone: An Exploratory Study. Integrated Supports for Women and Girls Experiencing Substance Use and Complex Needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1