The GlucoCoper - An Exploratory Study to Assess Coping Mechanisms of Women Diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus.

Q2 Medicine European Endocrinology Pub Date : 2019-04-01 Epub Date: 2019-04-12 DOI:10.17925/EE.2019.15.1.53
Bharti Kalra, Sanjay Kalra, Yatan Pal Singh Balhara, Komal Verma, Aas Azam, Fouzia A Shaikh
{"title":"The GlucoCoper - An Exploratory Study to Assess Coping Mechanisms of Women Diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Bharti Kalra,&nbsp;Sanjay Kalra,&nbsp;Yatan Pal Singh Balhara,&nbsp;Komal Verma,&nbsp;Aas Azam,&nbsp;Fouzia A Shaikh","doi":"10.17925/EE.2019.15.1.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes distress can be managed effectively by coping-skill training. To improve coping skills, one must begin by analysing current coping styles of an individual. The GlucoCoper has been developed as a brief, simple, easy-to-administer tool for assessing the coping mechanism of people with diabetes mellitus. The GlucoCoper includes six items rated on a graphic visual analogue scale. These include four items to assess positive coping skills (acceptance, optimism, planning and action) and two items to assess negative coping mechanisms (negativity and blame). The current single centre prospective study analysed the six-item GlucoCoper as a tool to identify coping skills in antenatal women with diabetes, and correlated them with level of diabetes distress. Greater duration of diabetes was related with lower optimism; while poor glycaemic control (high glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c]) was related with high negativity and low scores for planning. Highly educated subjects revealed greater negativity, while those from a rural background exhibited higher blame scores of =7.00 for negativity, =4.00 for planning, and =5.00 for action. These factors should prompt detailed evaluation and intervention. The findings of the current study suggest that GlucoCoper can be used as a screening tool for dysfunctional coping skills in pregnancy complicated by diabetes. Negativity, planning and action, the three domains which correlate strongly with the GlucoCoper score, can be used to create a three-item GlucoCoper, to be used as a brief and effective screening tool for dysfunctional coping skills in pregnancy complicated by diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":38860,"journal":{"name":"European Endocrinology","volume":"15 1","pages":"53-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/87/euendo-15-53.PMC6587899.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/EE.2019.15.1.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Diabetes distress can be managed effectively by coping-skill training. To improve coping skills, one must begin by analysing current coping styles of an individual. The GlucoCoper has been developed as a brief, simple, easy-to-administer tool for assessing the coping mechanism of people with diabetes mellitus. The GlucoCoper includes six items rated on a graphic visual analogue scale. These include four items to assess positive coping skills (acceptance, optimism, planning and action) and two items to assess negative coping mechanisms (negativity and blame). The current single centre prospective study analysed the six-item GlucoCoper as a tool to identify coping skills in antenatal women with diabetes, and correlated them with level of diabetes distress. Greater duration of diabetes was related with lower optimism; while poor glycaemic control (high glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c]) was related with high negativity and low scores for planning. Highly educated subjects revealed greater negativity, while those from a rural background exhibited higher blame scores of =7.00 for negativity, =4.00 for planning, and =5.00 for action. These factors should prompt detailed evaluation and intervention. The findings of the current study suggest that GlucoCoper can be used as a screening tool for dysfunctional coping skills in pregnancy complicated by diabetes. Negativity, planning and action, the three domains which correlate strongly with the GlucoCoper score, can be used to create a three-item GlucoCoper, to be used as a brief and effective screening tool for dysfunctional coping skills in pregnancy complicated by diabetes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GlucoCoper——一项评估糖尿病女性应对机制的探索性研究。
糖尿病的痛苦可以通过应对技巧训练得到有效的管理。为了提高应对能力,必须从分析个人当前的应对方式开始。GlucoCoper是一种简单易用的工具,用于评估糖尿病患者的应对机制。GlucoCoper包括六个以图形视觉模拟量表评分的项目。其中包括四项评估积极应对技能(接受、乐观、计划和行动),以及两项评估消极应对机制(消极和指责)。目前的单中心前瞻性研究分析了六项GlucoCoper,将其作为确定产前糖尿病女性应对技能的工具,并将其与糖尿病痛苦程度相关联。糖尿病持续时间越长,乐观情绪越低;而血糖控制不佳(高糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c])与高阴性和低计划得分有关。受过高等教育的受试者表现出更大的消极性,而那些来自农村背景的人表现出更高的消极性指责分数=7.00,计划得分=4.00,行动得分=5.00。这些因素应促使进行详细的评估和干预。目前的研究结果表明,GlucoCoper可以作为筛查妊娠期糖尿病患者应对能力失调的工具。消极性、计划和行动这三个领域与GlucoCoper评分密切相关,可以用来创建一个三项GlucoCoper,作为一个简短有效的筛查工具,用于筛查妊娠合并糖尿病的应对技能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Endocrinology
European Endocrinology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ADA-EASD Consensus Report on the Management of Hyperglycaemia in Type 2 Diabetes in an Afro-Asian Context: Broadening the Perspective. Clinical Profile and Factors Associated with Adverse Outcomes in Coronavirus Disease 2019-associated Mucormycosis: A Single-centre Study. What is Glycaemic Variability and which Pharmacological Treatment Options are Effective? A Narrative Review. Alarming Surge in Early-onset Type 2 Diabetes: A Global Catastrophe on the Horizon. Parathyroid Carcinoma Presenting as Recurrent Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Neck Mass: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1