Cervical musculoskeletal impairments in migraine and tension type headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2019.04.007
Zhiqi Liang, Olivia Galea, Lucy Thomas, Gwendolen Jull, Julia Treleaven
{"title":"Cervical musculoskeletal impairments in migraine and tension type headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Zhiqi Liang,&nbsp;Olivia Galea,&nbsp;Lucy Thomas,&nbsp;Gwendolen Jull,&nbsp;Julia Treleaven","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2019.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Neck pain is common in migraine and tension type headache (TTH). This review aimed to examine the evidence for cervical musculoskeletal impairments in these headaches.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Databases PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were searched from inception to December 2018. Observational studies using a comparator group were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Results were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Level of evidence for each outcome was assigned based on risk of bias, consistency of results and magnitude of difference between participants with headache and controls. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42018083683).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 48 studies included, the majority were rated moderate risk of bias due to possible confounding influences. In total, 17 cervical outcomes were assessed, with confidence in findings ranging from very low to moderate levels. Compared to controls, participants with TTH had greater forward head posture (FHP) (MD = −6.18°, 95% CI [-8.18°, −4.18°]) and less cervical range of motion (ROM) (greatest difference transverse plane MD = −15.0°, 95% CI [-27.7°, −2.3°]. Participants with migraine demonstrated minimally reduced cervical ROM (greatest difference sagittal plane MD = −5.4°, 95% CI [-9.9°, −0.9°]. No differences presented in head posture, strength, craniocervical flexion test performance or joint position error between migraineurs and controls.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TTH presented with more findings of cervical musculoskeletal impairments than migraine however levels of confidence in findings were low. Future studies should differentiate episodic from chronic headache, identify coexisting musculoskeletal cervical disorders, and describe neck pain behaviour in headache.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 67-83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.msksp.2019.04.007","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781219300827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

Aims

Neck pain is common in migraine and tension type headache (TTH). This review aimed to examine the evidence for cervical musculoskeletal impairments in these headaches.

Methods

Databases PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were searched from inception to December 2018. Observational studies using a comparator group were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Results were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Level of evidence for each outcome was assigned based on risk of bias, consistency of results and magnitude of difference between participants with headache and controls. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42018083683).

Results

Of 48 studies included, the majority were rated moderate risk of bias due to possible confounding influences. In total, 17 cervical outcomes were assessed, with confidence in findings ranging from very low to moderate levels. Compared to controls, participants with TTH had greater forward head posture (FHP) (MD = −6.18°, 95% CI [-8.18°, −4.18°]) and less cervical range of motion (ROM) (greatest difference transverse plane MD = −15.0°, 95% CI [-27.7°, −2.3°]. Participants with migraine demonstrated minimally reduced cervical ROM (greatest difference sagittal plane MD = −5.4°, 95% CI [-9.9°, −0.9°]. No differences presented in head posture, strength, craniocervical flexion test performance or joint position error between migraineurs and controls.

Conclusions

TTH presented with more findings of cervical musculoskeletal impairments than migraine however levels of confidence in findings were low. Future studies should differentiate episodic from chronic headache, identify coexisting musculoskeletal cervical disorders, and describe neck pain behaviour in headache.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偏头痛和紧张性头痛的颈椎肌肉骨骼损伤:系统回顾和荟萃分析
颈部疼痛在偏头痛和紧张性头痛(TTH)中很常见。本综述旨在研究这些头痛中颈椎肌肉骨骼损伤的证据。方法检索PubMed (Medline)、EMBASE、CINAHL、SCOPUS和Web of Science数据库,检索时间为建站至2018年12月。包括使用比较组的观察性研究。使用横断面研究评估工具评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应荟萃分析对结果进行汇总。每个结果的证据水平是根据偏倚风险、结果的一致性和头痛参与者与对照组之间差异的大小来分配的。(普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42018083683)。结果纳入的48项研究中,由于可能的混杂影响,大多数被评为中度偏倚风险。总共评估了17例宫颈结局,结果的置信度从非常低到中等水平不等。与对照组相比,TTH患者有更大的头部前倾(FHP) (MD = −6.18°,95% CI[-8.18°,−4.18°])和更小的颈椎活动范围(ROM)(最大横向差异MD = −15.0°,95% CI[-27.7°,−2.3°])。偏头痛患者表现出最小程度的颈椎ROM减少(矢状面MD最大差异 = −5.4°,95% CI[-9.9°,−0.9°]。偏头痛患者与对照组在头部姿势、力量、颅颈屈曲测试表现或关节位置误差方面均无差异。结论与偏头痛相比,stth表现出更多的颈椎肌肉骨骼损伤,但对结果的置信度较低。未来的研究应区分发作性头痛和慢性头痛,确定共存的颈部肌肉骨骼疾病,并描述头痛时的颈部疼痛行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
期刊最新文献
The association between education, practice, post-professional training and physical therapists’ attitudes and beliefs regarding low back pain management: A cross sectional survey study Beliefs and experiences of individuals with patellar tendinopathy following a rehabilitation program: A nested qualitative study Confidence and knowledge of Brazilian physiotherapists and physiotherapy students in managing patellofemoral pain The relationship between leisure time activities and chronic musculoskeletal pain in schoolteachers Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the exercise adherence Rating scale Mexican Spanish version (EARS-Mx)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1