{"title":"Simultaneous Adalimumab and Antitubercular Treatment for Latent Tubercular Infection: An Experience from Nepal.","authors":"Binit Vaidya, Shweta Nakarmi","doi":"10.1155/2019/2034950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Nepal, adalimumab is the most common agent being used, but in a disease activity-based dose tapering to address the economic constraints. Another constraint is the high risk of reactivation of tuberculosis in countries with high burden, especially with the use of tumor necrosis factor blocking agents. Though there are recommendations for screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) before using adalimumab, data is not clear regarding the appropriate screening schedule and the timing of initiation of biologic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This retrospective review of prospectively followed cohort of spondyloarthropathy patients aimed to evaluate the efficacy of simultaneous initiation of adalimumab with LTBI treatment. Patients fulfilling either the modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis or Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria and who were refractory to oral treatment were screened with Mantoux (≥10mm) and interferon gamma release assay (QuantiFERON) to detected LTBI. Those who tested positive were started on rifampicin/isoniazid combination for 3 months and adalimumab treatment on the same day. The patients were followed up at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and then every 3 months for 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 784 patients diagnosed, 92 were receiving adalimumab. LTBI was detected by positivity of either Mantoux or QuantiFERON in 29.3% patients. None of the patients with LTBI who were started on the 2 drug regime simultaneous with adalimumab developed activation of tuberculosis. However, two patients testing negative for both the tests developed tubercular pleural effusion during treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that screening for LTBI should be more frequent in patients from high tuberculosis burden countries; treatment of LTBI with rifampicin/isoniazid combination for 3 months is effective in preventing reactivation even when adalimumab is started simultaneously.</p>","PeriodicalId":51715,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/2034950","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2034950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Introduction: In Nepal, adalimumab is the most common agent being used, but in a disease activity-based dose tapering to address the economic constraints. Another constraint is the high risk of reactivation of tuberculosis in countries with high burden, especially with the use of tumor necrosis factor blocking agents. Though there are recommendations for screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) before using adalimumab, data is not clear regarding the appropriate screening schedule and the timing of initiation of biologic therapy.
Methodology: This retrospective review of prospectively followed cohort of spondyloarthropathy patients aimed to evaluate the efficacy of simultaneous initiation of adalimumab with LTBI treatment. Patients fulfilling either the modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis or Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria and who were refractory to oral treatment were screened with Mantoux (≥10mm) and interferon gamma release assay (QuantiFERON) to detected LTBI. Those who tested positive were started on rifampicin/isoniazid combination for 3 months and adalimumab treatment on the same day. The patients were followed up at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and then every 3 months for 2 years.
Results: Out of 784 patients diagnosed, 92 were receiving adalimumab. LTBI was detected by positivity of either Mantoux or QuantiFERON in 29.3% patients. None of the patients with LTBI who were started on the 2 drug regime simultaneous with adalimumab developed activation of tuberculosis. However, two patients testing negative for both the tests developed tubercular pleural effusion during treatment.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that screening for LTBI should be more frequent in patients from high tuberculosis burden countries; treatment of LTBI with rifampicin/isoniazid combination for 3 months is effective in preventing reactivation even when adalimumab is started simultaneously.
在尼泊尔,阿达木单抗是最常用的药物,但在基于疾病活动的剂量逐渐减少,以解决经济限制。另一个制约因素是,在高负担国家,特别是在使用肿瘤坏死因子阻滞剂的情况下,结核病重新激活的风险很高。虽然有建议在使用阿达木单抗之前筛查和治疗潜伏性结核感染(LTBI),但关于适当的筛查计划和开始生物治疗的时间,数据尚不清楚。方法:这项前瞻性随访的脊柱关节病患者队列回顾性研究旨在评估同时开始阿达木单抗与LTBI治疗的疗效。通过Mantoux(≥10mm)和干扰素γ释放法(QuantiFERON)检测LTBI,对符合强直性脊柱炎修改后的纽约标准或国际脊椎关节炎评估协会(Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society)标准且难以口服治疗的患者进行筛选。检测呈阳性的患者开始接受利福平/异烟肼联合治疗3个月,并在同一天接受阿达木单抗治疗。随访时间分别为2周、4周、12周,之后每3个月随访一次,随访2年。结果:在诊断的784例患者中,92例接受了阿达木单抗治疗。29.3%的患者通过Mantoux或QuantiFERON阳性检测LTBI。与阿达木单抗同时开始两种药物治疗方案的LTBI患者中,没有一例出现结核病活化。然而,两例两项检查均阴性的患者在治疗期间出现结核性胸腔积液。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在结核病高负担国家的患者中应该更频繁地筛查LTBI;利福平/异烟肼联合治疗LTBI 3个月,即使同时开始使用阿达木单抗,也能有效防止再激活。