Time to remission analysis for major depressive disorder after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).

IF 9 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Mental Illness Pub Date : 2019-06-11 eCollection Date: 2019-03-22 DOI:10.4081/mi.2019.8141
Ann M Manzardo, Brianna Ely, Maria Cristina Davila
{"title":"Time to remission analysis for major depressive disorder after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).","authors":"Ann M Manzardo,&nbsp;Brianna Ely,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Davila","doi":"10.4081/mi.2019.8141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We previously examined the efficacy of rTMS for major depressive disorder in an applied clinical practice. Clinical response was related to severity of depression as well as the rTMS instrument utilized suggesting a relationship to instrument or magnetic field parameters and individual factors. The effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of major depressive disorder was further evaluated using Log-Rank statistics for time to remission outcomes. A follow-up retrospective medical records study was carried out on patients with major depressive disorder undergoing rTMS therapy at AwakeningsKC Clinical Neuroscience Institute (CNI), a suburban tertiary psychiatric clinic. Cox Proportional Hazard with Log-Rank statistics were applied and the time course to clinical remission was evaluated over a 6-week period with respect to age, gender, and depression severity. Clinical response was observed referencing two different rTMS instruments (MagVenture; NeuroStar). Time to remission studies of 247 case reports (N=98 males; N=149 females) showed consistently greater clinically defined remission rates after 6 weeks of rTMS treatment for patients using the MagVenture <i>vs</i> NeuroStar instrument. Patients previously admitted for inpatient psychiatric hospitalization exhibited higher response rates when treated with the MagVenture rTMS unit. Stepwise Cox Proportional Hazards Regression final model of time to remission included rTMS unit, inpatient psychiatric hospitalization and obese body habitus. Response to rTMS in applied clinical practice is related to severity of psychiatric illness and may require consideration of magnetic field parameters of the rTMS unit with respect to individual factors such as sex or body composition.</p>","PeriodicalId":44029,"journal":{"name":"Mental Illness","volume":"11 1","pages":"8141"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4081/mi.2019.8141","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Illness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mi.2019.8141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We previously examined the efficacy of rTMS for major depressive disorder in an applied clinical practice. Clinical response was related to severity of depression as well as the rTMS instrument utilized suggesting a relationship to instrument or magnetic field parameters and individual factors. The effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of major depressive disorder was further evaluated using Log-Rank statistics for time to remission outcomes. A follow-up retrospective medical records study was carried out on patients with major depressive disorder undergoing rTMS therapy at AwakeningsKC Clinical Neuroscience Institute (CNI), a suburban tertiary psychiatric clinic. Cox Proportional Hazard with Log-Rank statistics were applied and the time course to clinical remission was evaluated over a 6-week period with respect to age, gender, and depression severity. Clinical response was observed referencing two different rTMS instruments (MagVenture; NeuroStar). Time to remission studies of 247 case reports (N=98 males; N=149 females) showed consistently greater clinically defined remission rates after 6 weeks of rTMS treatment for patients using the MagVenture vs NeuroStar instrument. Patients previously admitted for inpatient psychiatric hospitalization exhibited higher response rates when treated with the MagVenture rTMS unit. Stepwise Cox Proportional Hazards Regression final model of time to remission included rTMS unit, inpatient psychiatric hospitalization and obese body habitus. Response to rTMS in applied clinical practice is related to severity of psychiatric illness and may require consideration of magnetic field parameters of the rTMS unit with respect to individual factors such as sex or body composition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)后重度抑郁症缓解时间分析。
我们之前在应用临床实践中研究了rTMS对重度抑郁症的疗效。临床反应与抑郁症的严重程度以及所使用的rTMS仪器有关,表明与仪器或磁场参数和个体因素有关。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗重度抑郁症的有效性进一步采用Log-Rank统计方法评估缓解时间。对在郊区三级精神科诊所AwakeningsKC临床神经科学研究所(CNI)接受rTMS治疗的重性抑郁症患者进行随访回顾性医疗记录研究。采用Cox比例风险和Log-Rank统计,并在6周内评估临床缓解的时间过程,涉及年龄、性别和抑郁严重程度。参考两种不同的rTMS仪器(MagVenture;NeuroStar)。247例病例缓解时间研究(男性98例;N=149名女性)在使用MagVenture与NeuroStar仪器的患者进行6周rTMS治疗后,临床定义的缓解率一致更高。先前接受精神科住院治疗的患者在接受MagVenture rTMS单元治疗时表现出更高的反应率。逐步Cox比例风险回归的缓解时间最终模型包括rTMS单元、住院精神病患者和肥胖体质。临床应用中对rTMS的反应与精神疾病的严重程度有关,可能需要考虑rTMS单元的磁场参数与个体因素(如性别或身体成分)有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mental Illness
Mental Illness PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Factors Associated with Self-Reported Substance Use among Patients with Mental Illness in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study Biopsychosocial Profile of COVID-19 Patients Cared for in Public and Private Health Facilities in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring Mental Health among Patients Suffering from Dengue in Pakistani Tertiary Care Hospitals Physical Activity and Exercise as a Tool to Cure Anxiety and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Stress Is Associated with Quality of Life Reduction among Health Professionals in Vietnam: A Multisite Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1