Kevin I Kauweloa, Angelo Bergamo, Alonso N Gutierrez, Sotiris Stathakis, Nikos Papanikolaou, Panayiotis Mavroidis
{"title":"Use of 3D biological effective dose (BED) for optimizing multi-target liver cancer treatments.","authors":"Kevin I Kauweloa, Angelo Bergamo, Alonso N Gutierrez, Sotiris Stathakis, Nikos Papanikolaou, Panayiotis Mavroidis","doi":"10.1007/s13246-019-00771-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose is to calculate the composite 3D biological effective dose (BED) distribution in healthy liver, when multiple lesions are treated concurrently with different hypo-fractionated schemes and stereotactic body radiation therapy, and to investigate the potential of biological based plan optimization. Two patients, each having two tumors that were treated sequentially with different treatment plans, were selected. The treatment information of both treatment plans of the patients was used and their dose matrices were exported to an in-house MATLAB software, which was used to calculate the composite BED distribution. The composite BED distributions were used to determine if the healthy liver received BED beyond tolerance. When the dose to the minimum critical volume was less than tolerance, an optimization code was used to derive the scaling factors (ScF) that should be applied to the dose matrix of each plan until the minimum critical volume of healthy liver reaches a BED close to tolerance. It was shown that for each patient, there is a margin for dose escalation regarding the doses to the individual targets. More specifically, the ScFs of the doses range between 5.6 and 99 in the first patient, whereas for the second patient, the ScFs of the optimal doses range between 12.7 and 35.6. The present study indicates that there is a significant margin for dose escalation without increasing the radiation toxicity to the healthy liver. Also, the calculation of the composite BED distribution can provide additional information that may lead to a better assessment of the liver's tolerance to different fractionation schemes and prescribed doses as well as more clinically relevant treatment plan optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":55430,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":"42 3","pages":"711-718"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13246-019-00771-4","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00771-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The purpose is to calculate the composite 3D biological effective dose (BED) distribution in healthy liver, when multiple lesions are treated concurrently with different hypo-fractionated schemes and stereotactic body radiation therapy, and to investigate the potential of biological based plan optimization. Two patients, each having two tumors that were treated sequentially with different treatment plans, were selected. The treatment information of both treatment plans of the patients was used and their dose matrices were exported to an in-house MATLAB software, which was used to calculate the composite BED distribution. The composite BED distributions were used to determine if the healthy liver received BED beyond tolerance. When the dose to the minimum critical volume was less than tolerance, an optimization code was used to derive the scaling factors (ScF) that should be applied to the dose matrix of each plan until the minimum critical volume of healthy liver reaches a BED close to tolerance. It was shown that for each patient, there is a margin for dose escalation regarding the doses to the individual targets. More specifically, the ScFs of the doses range between 5.6 and 99 in the first patient, whereas for the second patient, the ScFs of the optimal doses range between 12.7 and 35.6. The present study indicates that there is a significant margin for dose escalation without increasing the radiation toxicity to the healthy liver. Also, the calculation of the composite BED distribution can provide additional information that may lead to a better assessment of the liver's tolerance to different fractionation schemes and prescribed doses as well as more clinically relevant treatment plan optimization.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine (APESM) is a multidisciplinary forum for information and research on the application of physics and engineering to medicine and human physiology. APESM covers a broad range of topics that include but is not limited to:
- Medical physics in radiotherapy
- Medical physics in diagnostic radiology
- Medical physics in nuclear medicine
- Mathematical modelling applied to medicine and human biology
- Clinical biomedical engineering
- Feature extraction, classification of EEG, ECG, EMG, EOG, and other biomedical signals;
- Medical imaging - contributions to new and improved methods;
- Modelling of physiological systems
- Image processing to extract information from images, e.g. fMRI, CT, etc.;
- Biomechanics, especially with applications to orthopaedics.
- Nanotechnology in medicine
APESM offers original reviews, scientific papers, scientific notes, technical papers, educational notes, book reviews and letters to the editor.
APESM is the journal of the Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine, and also the official journal of the College of Biomedical Engineers, Engineers Australia and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics.