The role of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical assessments in predicting meniscal tear surgery.

Yaman Karakoç, İsmail Burak Atalay
{"title":"The role of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical assessments in predicting meniscal tear surgery.","authors":"Yaman Karakoç,&nbsp;İsmail Burak Atalay","doi":"10.5606/ehc.2019.66962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the role of physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in predicting meniscal tear surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Medical records of a total of 997 patients (563 females, 434 males; mean age 40.53 years; range 18 to 66 years) who were recommended surgery for meniscal tear in an external center, but continued follow-up in our hospital between January 2012 and March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Data of the patients including demographic and clinical characteristics, physical examination findings, and MRI results were recorded. The visual analog scales (VAS) scores and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all the patients evaluated by MRI, 62.4% were recommended surgical treatment in private hospitals and 37.6% were recommended surgical intervention in state hospitals. Only 282 of them (28.3%) were treated surgically for meniscal tear after MRI evaluation and physical examination in our clinic. The median pre-treatment VAS score was 7.0 (range, 4 to 10) and 6.0 (range, 3 to 8) in the patients undergoing surgery and undergoing conservative treatment, respectively. The VAS and KOOS scores were similar between the groups at the postoperative sixth month and first year (p=0.940, p=0.203; p=116, p=0.057, respectively). Pain scores significantly decreased, while the KOOS scores significantly increased after the treatment in both groups (for all p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decision for surgery should be solely based on physical examination and radiological findings in meniscal tears.</p>","PeriodicalId":50551,"journal":{"name":"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery","volume":"30 2","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eklem Hastaliklari Ve Cerrahisi-Joint Diseases and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2019.66962","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the role of physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in predicting meniscal tear surgery.

Patients and methods: Medical records of a total of 997 patients (563 females, 434 males; mean age 40.53 years; range 18 to 66 years) who were recommended surgery for meniscal tear in an external center, but continued follow-up in our hospital between January 2012 and March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Data of the patients including demographic and clinical characteristics, physical examination findings, and MRI results were recorded. The visual analog scales (VAS) scores and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were evaluated.

Results: Of all the patients evaluated by MRI, 62.4% were recommended surgical treatment in private hospitals and 37.6% were recommended surgical intervention in state hospitals. Only 282 of them (28.3%) were treated surgically for meniscal tear after MRI evaluation and physical examination in our clinic. The median pre-treatment VAS score was 7.0 (range, 4 to 10) and 6.0 (range, 3 to 8) in the patients undergoing surgery and undergoing conservative treatment, respectively. The VAS and KOOS scores were similar between the groups at the postoperative sixth month and first year (p=0.940, p=0.203; p=116, p=0.057, respectively). Pain scores significantly decreased, while the KOOS scores significantly increased after the treatment in both groups (for all p=0.001).

Conclusion: Decision for surgery should be solely based on physical examination and radiological findings in meniscal tears.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁共振成像和临床评估在预测半月板撕裂手术中的作用。
目的:本研究旨在探讨体格检查和磁共振成像(MRI)结果在预测半月板撕裂手术中的作用。患者与方法:共997例患者,其中女性563例,男性434例;平均年龄40.53岁;年龄在18至66岁之间),因外中心半月板撕裂推荐手术,但在2012年1月至2018年3月期间在我院继续随访。记录患者的人口学、临床特征、体格检查、MRI结果等资料。评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和膝关节损伤及骨关节炎结局评分(oos)。结果:在所有MRI评估的患者中,62.4%建议在私立医院进行手术治疗,37.6%建议在公立医院进行手术干预。本院经MRI评估及体格检查,半月板撕裂仅行手术治疗282例(28.3%)。手术患者和保守治疗患者的治疗前VAS评分中位数分别为7.0(范围4 ~ 10)和6.0(范围3 ~ 8)。两组术后6个月和1年的VAS和kos评分相似(p=0.940, p=0.203;P =116, P =0.057)。两组治疗后疼痛评分均显著降低,kos评分均显著升高(p均=0.001)。结论:半月板撕裂应完全根据体格检查和影像学表现来决定手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
43.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (formerly published as Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi) is the official publication of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation. Joint Diseases and Related Surgery is open access journal. The full text of the articles of the Journal is freely available without embargo since 1990. Joint Diseases and Related Surgery is international, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of joint diseases and related surgey.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic treatment of bilateral hallux saltans in an ordinary woman. Median nerve and carpal tunnel volume changes after two different surgical methods: A comparative magnetic resonance imaging study of mini-open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The effect of pentoxifylline on Achilles tendon healing in tenotomized rabbits. Icariin promotes early and late stages of fracture healing in rats. Comparison of three surgical methods in the treatment of intraarticular comminuted distal radius fractures: Volar locking plate, non-bridging external fixator, and bridging external fixator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1