Preferences of Iranian average risk population for colorectal cancer screening tests.

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE Pub Date : 2019-05-13 DOI:10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2017-0151
Vajiheh Ramezani Doroh, Alireza Delavari, Mehdi Yaseri, Sara Emamgholipour Sefiddashti, Ali Akbarisari
{"title":"Preferences of Iranian average risk population for colorectal cancer screening tests.","authors":"Vajiheh Ramezani Doroh, Alireza Delavari, Mehdi Yaseri, Sara Emamgholipour Sefiddashti, Ali Akbarisari","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2017-0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThe purpose of this paper is to explore the preferences of the average risk Iranian population for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests.\n\n\nDESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH\nA standard stated-preferences method with discrete choice models was used to identify the preferences. Data about socio-demographic status, health status and preferences for CRC screening tests were collected by a structured questionnaire that was completed by 500 people aged 50-75 years. Mixed logit model was used to analyze the preferences.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nThe regression model showed that the test process, pain, place, frequency, preparation, sensitivity, complication risk, mortality rate and cost were the final attributes; that had a statistically significant correlation with the preferences of the people in choosing CRC screening tests. The socio-demographic and health status of participants had no significant correlation with the individuals' preferences.\n\n\nPRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS\nThis study provides insight into how different characteristics of a CRC screening test might influence the preferences of individuals about that test.\n\n\nORIGINALITY/VALUE\nThis was the first study of this type in Iran to elicit the preferences of the average risk population for CRC screening tests using a discrete choice model.","PeriodicalId":47455,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2017-0151","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2017-0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this paper is to explore the preferences of the average risk Iranian population for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH A standard stated-preferences method with discrete choice models was used to identify the preferences. Data about socio-demographic status, health status and preferences for CRC screening tests were collected by a structured questionnaire that was completed by 500 people aged 50-75 years. Mixed logit model was used to analyze the preferences. FINDINGS The regression model showed that the test process, pain, place, frequency, preparation, sensitivity, complication risk, mortality rate and cost were the final attributes; that had a statistically significant correlation with the preferences of the people in choosing CRC screening tests. The socio-demographic and health status of participants had no significant correlation with the individuals' preferences. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS This study provides insight into how different characteristics of a CRC screening test might influence the preferences of individuals about that test. ORIGINALITY/VALUE This was the first study of this type in Iran to elicit the preferences of the average risk population for CRC screening tests using a discrete choice model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗平均风险人群对结直肠癌筛查试验的偏好
目的:本文的目的是探讨伊朗平均风险人群对结直肠癌(CRC)筛查试验的偏好。设计/方法/方法:采用离散选择模型的标准陈述偏好方法来识别偏好。有关社会人口状况、健康状况和CRC筛查偏好的数据通过结构化问卷收集,该问卷由500名年龄在50-75岁之间的人完成。采用混合logit模型进行偏好分析。结果:回归模型显示,检测过程、疼痛、地点、频率、准备、敏感性、并发症风险、死亡率和成本是最终属性;这与人们选择CRC筛查试验的偏好有统计学上显著的相关性。参与者的社会人口学和健康状况与个人偏好无显著相关。实际意义:本研究提供了关于CRC筛查测试的不同特征如何影响个体对该测试的偏好的见解。原创性/价值:这是伊朗首次使用离散选择模型得出平均风险人群对CRC筛查试验的偏好的此类研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: ■Successful quality/continuous improvement projects ■The use of quality tools and models in leadership management development such as the EFQM Excellence Model, Balanced Scorecard, Quality Standards, Managed Care ■Issues relating to process control such as Six Sigma, Leadership, Managing Change and Process Mapping ■Improving patient care through quality related programmes and/or research Articles that use quantitative and qualitative methods are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
A cross-organizational Lean deployment in an Italian regional healthcare system. The mediating effect of patient trust on the relationship between service quality and patient satisfaction. Evaluating patient and medical staff satisfaction from doctor-patient communication. Lean six sigma and stroke in rural hospital - The case of Baruch Padeh Medical Center. Examining the behavioural intention of inpatients in Indian government hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1