Chapter IV: In Search of the Father-Infant Activation Relationship: A Person-Centered Approach.

IF 9.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development Pub Date : 2019-03-01 Epub Date: 2019-04-29
Brenda L Volling, Matthew M Stevenson, Paige Safyer, Richard Gonzalez, Joyce Y Lee
{"title":"Chapter IV: In Search of the Father-Infant Activation Relationship: A Person-Centered Approach.","authors":"Brenda L Volling,&nbsp;Matthew M Stevenson,&nbsp;Paige Safyer,&nbsp;Richard Gonzalez,&nbsp;Joyce Y Lee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study explored whether fathers and mothers from 195 two-parent U.S. families engaged in a form of <i>activation</i> parenting (i.e., sensitivity, cognitive stimulation, and moderate intrusiveness) with their secondborn, 12-month-old infants during a 15-min challenging teaching task, and to determine if this type of interaction was more common among fathers. Mean comparisons showed that fathers were lower on sensitivity, positive regard, and stimulation of development, and were more detached than mothers. Latent Profile Analyses revealed similar <i>supportive, disengaged</i>, and <i>activation</i> parenting profile<i>s</i> for fathers and mothers, with more fathers in the activation class. Chi-square analyses found significant associations across mothers and fathers; most infants (30%) had activation fathers and mothers, with 26% having supportive mothers and activation fathers, and 11.4% having two supportive parents. Parenting profiles were unrelated to attachment security. Results need to be replicated with children of different ages, with families from different backgrounds, and beyond the challenging teaching paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":55972,"journal":{"name":"Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development","volume":"84 1","pages":"50-63"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6625660/pdf/nihms-1039554.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study explored whether fathers and mothers from 195 two-parent U.S. families engaged in a form of activation parenting (i.e., sensitivity, cognitive stimulation, and moderate intrusiveness) with their secondborn, 12-month-old infants during a 15-min challenging teaching task, and to determine if this type of interaction was more common among fathers. Mean comparisons showed that fathers were lower on sensitivity, positive regard, and stimulation of development, and were more detached than mothers. Latent Profile Analyses revealed similar supportive, disengaged, and activation parenting profiles for fathers and mothers, with more fathers in the activation class. Chi-square analyses found significant associations across mothers and fathers; most infants (30%) had activation fathers and mothers, with 26% having supportive mothers and activation fathers, and 11.4% having two supportive parents. Parenting profiles were unrelated to attachment security. Results need to be replicated with children of different ages, with families from different backgrounds, and beyond the challenging teaching paradigm.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第四章:亲子激活关系的探索:以人为本的视角。
目前的研究探讨了来自195个美国双亲家庭的父亲和母亲是否在15分钟具有挑战性的教学任务中与他们的第二个12个月大的婴儿进行了一种形式的激活养育(即敏感,认知刺激和适度侵入性),并确定这种类型的互动是否在父亲中更常见。平均比较表明,父亲在敏感性、积极关注和刺激发展方面比母亲低,而且比母亲更超然。潜在特征分析显示,父亲和母亲的支持型、不投入型和激活型育儿特征相似,激活型班级的父亲更多。卡方分析发现,母亲和父亲之间存在显著关联;大多数婴儿(30%)有激活的父亲和母亲,26%有支持的母亲和激活的父亲,11.4%有两个支持的父母。父母的情况与依恋安全无关。结果需要在不同年龄的儿童、不同背景的家庭和具有挑战性的教学模式之外进行复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Since 1935, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development has been a platform for presenting in-depth research studies and significant findings in child development and related disciplines. Each issue features a single study or a collection of papers on a unified theme, often complemented by commentary and discussion. In alignment with all Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD) publications, the Monographs facilitate the exchange of data, techniques, research methods, and conclusions among development specialists across diverse disciplines. Subscribing to the Monographs series also includes a full subscription (6 issues) to Child Development, the flagship journal of the SRCD, and Child Development Perspectives, the newest journal from the SRCD.
期刊最新文献
Fostering Prosociality in Refugee Children: An Intervention With Rohingya Children. Place-Based Developmental Research: Conceptual and Methodological Advances in Studying Youth Development in Context. Mindset × Context: Schools, Classrooms, and the Unequal Translation of Expectations into Math Achievement. Understanding Heterogeneity in the Impact of Public Preschool Programs. Parenting in the Context of the Child: Genetic and Social Processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1