Comparison of antinociceptive efficacy and gastroprotection between celecoxib and diclofenac plus misoprostol in rats.

Gerardo Reyes-García, Myrna Déciga-Campos, Roberto Medina-Santillan, Vinicio Granados-Soto
{"title":"Comparison of antinociceptive efficacy and gastroprotection between celecoxib and diclofenac plus misoprostol in rats.","authors":"Gerardo Reyes-García,&nbsp;Myrna Déciga-Campos,&nbsp;Roberto Medina-Santillan,&nbsp;Vinicio Granados-Soto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study was designed to assess the antinociceptive efficacy and gastroprotective activity of the mixture of diclofenac and misoprostol and its comparison with celecoxib in rats. The effect of diclofenac/misoprostol and celecoxib was assessed in the 1% formalin test. Female Wistar rats were fasted 12 hr before experiments and diclofenac (10 and 50 mg/kg), misoprostol (100 microg/kg), celecoxib (30 and 100 mg/kg), saline and the combination of diclofenac (50 mg/kg) plus misoprostol (25, 50 and 100 microg/kg) were administered orally. Nociceptive behavior was assessed during the following hr. Diclofenac and celecoxib dose-dependently reduced formalin-induced nociception reaching similar maximal effects. Moreover, misoprostol did not produce antinociception, but increased diclofenac-induced antinociception. Animals were sacrificed 3 hr following drug administration and stomachs examined to assess gastric damage. Misoprostol did not produce any damage to the stomach. However, diclofenac, but not celecoxib, produced significant gastric damage (number of stomach ulcers) in a dose-dependent fashion. Misoprostol dose-dependently reduced diclofenac-induced ulcers. Data show that diclofenac and celecoxib lead to similar antinociception, with diclofenac being more active to produce gastric damage. However, diclofenac-induced gastric damage can be markedly reduced by misoprostol. In addition to its gastroprotective effect, misoprostol showed a synergic effect on diclofenac-induced anti-nociception. Considering the cardiovascular effects of COX-2 selective inhibitors, the combination of diclofenac and misoprostol could represent a safer and effective alternative for patients with pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20701,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society","volume":"50 ","pages":"69-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study was designed to assess the antinociceptive efficacy and gastroprotective activity of the mixture of diclofenac and misoprostol and its comparison with celecoxib in rats. The effect of diclofenac/misoprostol and celecoxib was assessed in the 1% formalin test. Female Wistar rats were fasted 12 hr before experiments and diclofenac (10 and 50 mg/kg), misoprostol (100 microg/kg), celecoxib (30 and 100 mg/kg), saline and the combination of diclofenac (50 mg/kg) plus misoprostol (25, 50 and 100 microg/kg) were administered orally. Nociceptive behavior was assessed during the following hr. Diclofenac and celecoxib dose-dependently reduced formalin-induced nociception reaching similar maximal effects. Moreover, misoprostol did not produce antinociception, but increased diclofenac-induced antinociception. Animals were sacrificed 3 hr following drug administration and stomachs examined to assess gastric damage. Misoprostol did not produce any damage to the stomach. However, diclofenac, but not celecoxib, produced significant gastric damage (number of stomach ulcers) in a dose-dependent fashion. Misoprostol dose-dependently reduced diclofenac-induced ulcers. Data show that diclofenac and celecoxib lead to similar antinociception, with diclofenac being more active to produce gastric damage. However, diclofenac-induced gastric damage can be markedly reduced by misoprostol. In addition to its gastroprotective effect, misoprostol showed a synergic effect on diclofenac-induced anti-nociception. Considering the cardiovascular effects of COX-2 selective inhibitors, the combination of diclofenac and misoprostol could represent a safer and effective alternative for patients with pain.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞来昔布与双氯芬酸加米索前列醇对大鼠抗伤感受效果及胃保护作用的比较。
本研究旨在评估双氯芬酸与米索前列醇混合剂对大鼠的抗伤性和胃保护作用,并与塞来昔布进行比较。在1%福尔马林试验中评估双氯芬酸/米索前列醇和塞来昔布的效果。雌性Wistar大鼠实验前禁食12小时,口服双氯芬酸(10、50 mg/kg)、米索前列醇(100微克/kg)、塞来昔布(30、100 mg/kg)、生理盐水及双氯芬酸(50 mg/kg)加米索前列醇(25、50、100微克/kg)。在接下来的一个小时内评估伤害性行为。双氯芬酸和塞来昔布剂量依赖性地减少福尔马林诱导的伤害感受,达到类似的最大效果。此外,米索前列醇不产生抗痛觉,但增加双氯芬酸诱导的抗痛觉。给药后3小时处死动物,检查胃以评估胃损伤。米索前列醇对胃没有任何损害。然而,双氯芬酸,而不是塞来昔布,以剂量依赖的方式产生显著的胃损伤(胃溃疡数量)。米索前列醇剂量依赖性降低双氯芬酸诱发的溃疡。数据显示双氯芬酸和塞来昔布导致相似的抗痛感,双氯芬酸更活跃地产生胃损伤。然而,米索前列醇可以显著减轻双氯芬酸引起的胃损伤。除了胃保护作用外,米索前列醇对双氯芬酸诱导的抗伤害性也有协同作用。考虑到COX-2选择性抑制剂对心血管的影响,双氯芬酸联合米索前列醇可能是疼痛患者更安全有效的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calmodulin antagonists inhibit sea urchin sperm hyperpolarization necessary for directed movement toward the egg. Valproic acid modulates brain plasticity through epigenetic chromatin remodeling in the blind rat: implications for human sight recovery. Treatment with LA-419 prevents monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension and lung injury in the rat. Ageing, health and medication consumption in a sample of academic employees at a Mexican university. An overview of colorimetric assay methods used to assess survival or proliferation of mammalian cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1