Representation of concussion subtypes in common postconcussion symptom-rating scales.

Q3 Medicine Concussion Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.2217/cnc-2019-0005
Angela Lumba-Brown, Jamshid Ghajar, Jordan Cornwell, O Josh Bloom, James Chesnutt, James R Clugston, Raina Kolluri, John J Leddy, Masaru Teramoto, Gerard Gioia
{"title":"Representation of concussion subtypes in common postconcussion symptom-rating scales.","authors":"Angela Lumba-Brown, Jamshid Ghajar, Jordan Cornwell, O Josh Bloom, James Chesnutt, James R Clugston, Raina Kolluri, John J Leddy, Masaru Teramoto, Gerard Gioia","doi":"10.2217/cnc-2019-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Postconcussion symptom-rating scales are frequently used concussion assessment tools that do not align directly with new expert, consensus-based concussion subtype classification systems. This may result in delays in concussion diagnosis, subspecialty referral and rehabilitative strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the representation of subtype-directed symptomatology in common postconcussion symptom-rating scales.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature review and expert consensus were used to compile commonly used concussion symptom-rating scales. Statistics were generated to describe the degree of representation of the consensus symptom set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of symptoms representing each subtype/associated condition is low overall (15-26%). The ocular-motor (11%) and vestibular subtypes (19%) and cervical strain (5%)-associated condition were the most under-represented and also had the greatest unmet needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concussion subtypes do not have equal representation on commonly used concussion symptom-rating scales. There is a need for a subtype-directed symptom assessment to allow for increased accuracy of diagnosis and to guide management.</p>","PeriodicalId":37006,"journal":{"name":"Concussion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/cnc-2019-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Postconcussion symptom-rating scales are frequently used concussion assessment tools that do not align directly with new expert, consensus-based concussion subtype classification systems. This may result in delays in concussion diagnosis, subspecialty referral and rehabilitative strategies.

Objective: To determine the representation of subtype-directed symptomatology in common postconcussion symptom-rating scales.

Methods: Literature review and expert consensus were used to compile commonly used concussion symptom-rating scales. Statistics were generated to describe the degree of representation of the consensus symptom set.

Results: The percentage of symptoms representing each subtype/associated condition is low overall (15-26%). The ocular-motor (11%) and vestibular subtypes (19%) and cervical strain (5%)-associated condition were the most under-represented and also had the greatest unmet needs.

Conclusion: Concussion subtypes do not have equal representation on commonly used concussion symptom-rating scales. There is a need for a subtype-directed symptom assessment to allow for increased accuracy of diagnosis and to guide management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑震荡亚型在常见脑震荡后症状评分量表中的代表性。
目的:脑震荡后症状评分量表是经常使用的脑震荡评估工具,但与新的专家共识脑震荡亚型分类系统并不直接一致。这可能会导致脑震荡诊断、亚专科转诊和康复策略的延误:目的:确定常见脑震荡后症状评分量表中亚型定向症状的代表性:方法:利用文献综述和专家共识编制常用脑震荡症状评分量表。方法:通过文献综述和专家共识,编制出常用的脑震荡症状评分量表,并进行统计,以描述共识症状集的代表性程度:结果:代表各亚型/相关症状的百分比总体较低(15-26%)。眼球运动亚型(11%)和前庭亚型(19%)以及颈椎劳损(5%)相关症状的代表性最弱,未满足的需求也最大:结论:在常用的脑震荡症状评分量表中,脑震荡亚型的代表性不尽相同。有必要针对亚型进行症状评估,以提高诊断的准确性并指导治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Concussion
Concussion Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Persistent post-concussion symptoms include neural auditory processing in young children. Initial investigation of kinesiophobia as a predictor of functional reaction time one year after concussion Awareness and understanding of concussion among Aboriginal Australians with high health literacy Dual statistical models link baseline visual attention measure to risk for significant symptomatic concussion in sports The National Football League and traumatic brain injury: blood-based evaluation at the game
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1