Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial on a multimodal training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy – LapTrain

Mirco Friedrich , Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski , Tanja Proctor , Carly Garrow , Anas Amin Preukschas , Hannes Götz Kenngott , Lars Fischer , Beat-Peter Müller-Stich , Felix Nickel
{"title":"Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial on a multimodal training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy – LapTrain","authors":"Mirco Friedrich ,&nbsp;Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski ,&nbsp;Tanja Proctor ,&nbsp;Carly Garrow ,&nbsp;Anas Amin Preukschas ,&nbsp;Hannes Götz Kenngott ,&nbsp;Lars Fischer ,&nbsp;Beat-Peter Müller-Stich ,&nbsp;Felix Nickel","doi":"10.1016/j.isjp.2017.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has replaced many open procedures in visceral surgery, technical and psychomotor obstacles remain a constant challenge for surgeons and trainees. However, there are various training curricula enabling surgeons to acquire the visuospatial and psychomotor abilities additionally required when performing MIS. Currently accepted training modalities include box-trainers, organ and animal models as well as completely simulated training environments, realized in virtual reality (VR) trainers. All of these methods facilitate an adequate training prior to patient contact, so patient safety can benefit as well. This study aims to evaluate the benefit of a structured multi-modality laparoscopy training curriculum.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Junior and senior surgical residents are included (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->60). Groups are stratified with concern to previous experience and training of participants. The training curriculum consists of a standardized sequence of available modalities and exercises on box- and VR-trainers. Specific consideration applies to the training effect during the repeated performance of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) between intervention (training in between LCs) and control group (no training in between LCs). Analysis of training effects is performed using a cadaveric model for LC and objectified using the validated scoring system Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This study assesses the value of a multimodal training platform in medical education and postgraduate training and aims at illustrating possible guidelines when establishing such a curriculum. Possible factors of influence, such as varying backgrounds, learning motivation and –success among participants are explored in the data analysis and add beneficially to further evaluating the efficacy of such training to more heterogeneous participant groups like medical students and other professionals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":42077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 11-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.isjp.2017.07.002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246835741730030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background

Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has replaced many open procedures in visceral surgery, technical and psychomotor obstacles remain a constant challenge for surgeons and trainees. However, there are various training curricula enabling surgeons to acquire the visuospatial and psychomotor abilities additionally required when performing MIS. Currently accepted training modalities include box-trainers, organ and animal models as well as completely simulated training environments, realized in virtual reality (VR) trainers. All of these methods facilitate an adequate training prior to patient contact, so patient safety can benefit as well. This study aims to evaluate the benefit of a structured multi-modality laparoscopy training curriculum.

Methods

Junior and senior surgical residents are included (n = 60). Groups are stratified with concern to previous experience and training of participants. The training curriculum consists of a standardized sequence of available modalities and exercises on box- and VR-trainers. Specific consideration applies to the training effect during the repeated performance of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) between intervention (training in between LCs) and control group (no training in between LCs). Analysis of training effects is performed using a cadaveric model for LC and objectified using the validated scoring system Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS).

Discussion

This study assesses the value of a multimodal training platform in medical education and postgraduate training and aims at illustrating possible guidelines when establishing such a curriculum. Possible factors of influence, such as varying backgrounds, learning motivation and –success among participants are explored in the data analysis and add beneficially to further evaluating the efficacy of such training to more heterogeneous participant groups like medical students and other professionals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆囊切除术多模式训练课程的随机对照试验研究方案
尽管微创手术(MIS)在内脏手术中已经取代了许多开放式手术,但技术和精神运动障碍仍然是外科医生和学员面临的一个持续挑战。然而,有各种各样的培训课程,使外科医生获得视觉空间和精神运动能力,在执行MIS时额外需要。目前接受的训练方式包括盒子训练器、器官和动物模型,以及在虚拟现实(VR)训练器中实现的完全模拟的训练环境。所有这些方法都有助于在与患者接触之前进行充分的培训,因此患者的安全也可以受益。本研究旨在评估结构化多模态腹腔镜培训课程的益处。方法研究对象为60名住院医师。小组是根据参与者以前的经验和培训进行分层的。培训课程包括一个标准化的可用模式序列,以及盒式和虚拟现实培训师的练习。具体考虑的是干预组(在LC之间进行训练)和对照组(在LC之间不进行训练)在重复执行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)时的训练效果。使用LC的尸体模型进行训练效果分析,并使用经过验证的评分系统全球腹腔镜手术技能评估(GOALS)进行客观化。本研究评估了多模式培训平台在医学教育和研究生培训中的价值,旨在说明建立此类课程时可能的指导方针。在数据分析中探讨了可能的影响因素,如不同的背景、学习动机和参与者之间的成功,并有助于进一步评估这种培训对更异质的参与者群体(如医学生和其他专业人员)的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: IJS Protocols is the first peer-reviewed, international, open access journal seeking to publish research protocols across across the full breadth of the surgical field. We are aim to provide rapid submission to decision times whilst maintaining a high quality peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
The association of breast surgery ASPIRE: breast pain pathway rapid evaluation project - study protocol. The MARECA (national study of management of breast cancer locoregional recurrence and oncological outcomes) study: protocol for a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Artificial intelligence-enabled ophthalmoscopy for papilledema: a systematic review protocol. Protocol to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in patients with refractory ascites after liver resection: an open-label, single-arm phase I/II study A new minimally invasive, nonexcisional, surgical browlift technique with minimal scarring: a protocol for a prospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1