Autonomic Synchronization under Three Task Conditions and its Impact on Team Performance.

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Stephen J Guastello, Lucas Mirabito, Anthony F Peressini
{"title":"Autonomic Synchronization under Three Task Conditions and its Impact on Team Performance.","authors":"Stephen J Guastello,&nbsp;Lucas Mirabito,&nbsp;Anthony F Peressini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychologists have had a long-standing interest in the connections between group processes and team performance. The biopsychosocial perspective has piqued an interest in the connection between team processes and performance and coordinated and synchronized physiological arousal levels among team members. Studies of synchronization in work teams have been stalled by the lack of a metric that captures the total synchronization within teams of three or more people. This study examined how synchronized physiological arousal does in fact connect to team performance and related group process outcomes by utilizing the SE coefficient developed by Guastello and Peressini. Forty-three groups of 3 to 8 participants (total N = 197) participated in a survival simulation. Synchroniza-tion coefficients were produced for three task segments: watching an orientation video together, an individual decision task, and a group decision task. Primary results showed: (a) Synchronization was greater in larger groups across the three task segments. (b) A combination of the three synchronization coefficients - higher during the team task and lower otherwise - was correlated with higher workload ratings for performance demands, greater team dissatisfaction, and lower demands for time-sharing between the individual and the team.</p>","PeriodicalId":46218,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychologists have had a long-standing interest in the connections between group processes and team performance. The biopsychosocial perspective has piqued an interest in the connection between team processes and performance and coordinated and synchronized physiological arousal levels among team members. Studies of synchronization in work teams have been stalled by the lack of a metric that captures the total synchronization within teams of three or more people. This study examined how synchronized physiological arousal does in fact connect to team performance and related group process outcomes by utilizing the SE coefficient developed by Guastello and Peressini. Forty-three groups of 3 to 8 participants (total N = 197) participated in a survival simulation. Synchroniza-tion coefficients were produced for three task segments: watching an orientation video together, an individual decision task, and a group decision task. Primary results showed: (a) Synchronization was greater in larger groups across the three task segments. (b) A combination of the three synchronization coefficients - higher during the team task and lower otherwise - was correlated with higher workload ratings for performance demands, greater team dissatisfaction, and lower demands for time-sharing between the individual and the team.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种任务条件下的自主同步及其对团队绩效的影响
长期以来,心理学家一直对团队过程和团队表现之间的联系感兴趣。从生物心理社会的角度来看,团队过程和绩效之间的联系以及团队成员之间协调和同步的生理唤醒水平引起了人们的兴趣。由于缺乏能够捕获三人或三人以上团队中的全部同步的度量,对工作团队中的同步的研究已经停滞不前。本研究利用Guastello和Peressini提出的SE系数,考察了同步生理唤醒实际上如何与团队绩效和相关的团队过程结果联系起来。43组,每组3 - 8人(N = 197)参加生存模拟。同步系数产生于三个任务段:一起观看定向视频、个人决策任务和群体决策任务。初步结果显示:(a)在三个任务段中,较大的组的同步性更大。(b)三个同步系数的组合- -在团队任务期间较高而在其他时间较低- -与业绩要求的较高工作量评分、更大的团队不满和个人与团队之间的时间分配较低的要求有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Dynamical Systems Principles Underlying Resistance, Resilience, and Growth. Elasticity, Rigidity, and Resilience in Occupational Contexts. Resilience as Anticipation in Organizational Systems: An Agent-based Computational Approach. Romantic Resilience: Fractal Conflict Dynamics and Network Flexibility Predict Dating Satisfaction and Commitment. Structural Integrity, Flexibility, and Timing: Introduction to a Special Issue on Resilience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1