{"title":"[Reliability of the Identification Result of Score Value ≧2.000 with the MALDI Biotyper: What Kind of Polymicrobial Species Are Included].","authors":"Hiroki Hanaiwa, Taeko Narita, Kyohei Kato, Atsumi Yokoo, Kazuhiro Shinto, Yumiko Funashima, Kenichi Sato, Zenzo Nagasawa, Tsukuru Umemura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification of bacteria by using MALDI Biotyper is relevant at the species category if Score Value (SV) is not less than 2.000. However, in practical examination, the analysis by MALDI Biotyper frequently produces the multiple candidate bacterial species with SV ≥2.000. In this study, we analyzed the ratio of multiple results among 10,081 specimens and identified the species of bacteria with high frequency of multiple results. Our analysis indicated that 8,129 strains out of 10,081 strains examined from July 2015 to July 2017, showed multiple identification results with MALDI Biotyper, and that multiple result was obtained in 4.9% of gram positive cocci analysis, 5.8% of gram positive rods, 25.4% of gram negative cocci, 16% of gram negative rod, none of fungus. In particular, MALDI Biotyper analysis of <i>Enterobacter</i> spp. (<i>E. cloacae</i>, <i>E. asburiae</i>, <i>E. kobei</i>, etc.), <i>Acinetobacter</i> spp. (<i>A. baumannii</i>, <i>A. nosocomialis</i>, <i>A. pittii</i> etc.), <i>Neisseria</i> spp. (<i>N. flavescens</i>, <i>N. perflava</i> etc.) had high ratios of multiple results. Our data suggests that genetic homology among bacteria results in multiple results of bacteria identification. The mass spectrometer method is the rapid test for bacteria identification. However, for obtaining higher specificity, it is required to combine with other methods. Furthermore, systematic annotation of bacteria is highly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"29 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Identification of bacteria by using MALDI Biotyper is relevant at the species category if Score Value (SV) is not less than 2.000. However, in practical examination, the analysis by MALDI Biotyper frequently produces the multiple candidate bacterial species with SV ≥2.000. In this study, we analyzed the ratio of multiple results among 10,081 specimens and identified the species of bacteria with high frequency of multiple results. Our analysis indicated that 8,129 strains out of 10,081 strains examined from July 2015 to July 2017, showed multiple identification results with MALDI Biotyper, and that multiple result was obtained in 4.9% of gram positive cocci analysis, 5.8% of gram positive rods, 25.4% of gram negative cocci, 16% of gram negative rod, none of fungus. In particular, MALDI Biotyper analysis of Enterobacter spp. (E. cloacae, E. asburiae, E. kobei, etc.), Acinetobacter spp. (A. baumannii, A. nosocomialis, A. pittii etc.), Neisseria spp. (N. flavescens, N. perflava etc.) had high ratios of multiple results. Our data suggests that genetic homology among bacteria results in multiple results of bacteria identification. The mass spectrometer method is the rapid test for bacteria identification. However, for obtaining higher specificity, it is required to combine with other methods. Furthermore, systematic annotation of bacteria is highly recommended.