Endoscopic balloon dilatation of primary obstructive megaureter: method standardization and predictive prognostic factors.

Q3 Medicine Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica Pub Date : 2019-12-23 DOI:10.4081/pmc.2019.219
Salvatore Fabio Chiarenza, Cosimo Bleve, Elisa Zolpi, Francesco Battaglino, Lorella Fasoli, Valeria Bucci
{"title":"Endoscopic balloon dilatation of primary obstructive megaureter: method standardization and predictive prognostic factors.","authors":"Salvatore Fabio Chiarenza,&nbsp;Cosimo Bleve,&nbsp;Elisa Zolpi,&nbsp;Francesco Battaglino,&nbsp;Lorella Fasoli,&nbsp;Valeria Bucci","doi":"10.4081/pmc.2019.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of congenital primary obstructive megaureter (POM) is usually conservative, especially during the first year of life. Endoscopic high-pressure balloon dilatation (EHPBD) is indicated when symptoms, increasing dilatation and progressive renal damage are recorded, particularly in children younger than one year of age. We identified and described endoscopic prognostic factors predicting the success or failure of endoscopic dilatation. Thirty-eight patients (33 M;5 F) with POM from 2005-2018 were included. Diagnosis was based on US distal ureter dilatation (>7 mm), obstructive MAG-3 diuretic renogram and absence of vesicoureteral reflux (cystography). 24 patients were under 1 year of age. All patients underwent cystoscopy and high-pressure balloon dilatation with 3,5 Fr dilating balloon, after ascending pyelography. Median follow-up was of 6.5 years. We identified characteristics with poor prognosis: stenotic punctiform ureteral ostium and/or ostium located in a bladder diverticulum (9 pts) and stenotic tract longer than 1 cm (5 pts). The patients with a stenotic tract shorter than 1 cm (18 pts) were divided into two groups: <5 mm (5 pts) and between 5 and 10 mm (13 pts) showed a good response to dilatation. Endoscopic evaluation of ureteral ostium with pneumatic dilatation when possible is a useful diagnostic and therapeutic solution for POM treatment, especially under one year of age. EHPBD is effective in short stenotic tracts (<5 mm). It may also be repeated with good results in intermediate stenotic sections (5 mm-1 cm). According to our preliminary results, the procedure is more effective if performed earlier (3-7 months of life). Greater cohort and longer follow-up are needed to verify the stability of these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":35535,"journal":{"name":"Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4081/pmc.2019.219","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/pmc.2019.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The management of congenital primary obstructive megaureter (POM) is usually conservative, especially during the first year of life. Endoscopic high-pressure balloon dilatation (EHPBD) is indicated when symptoms, increasing dilatation and progressive renal damage are recorded, particularly in children younger than one year of age. We identified and described endoscopic prognostic factors predicting the success or failure of endoscopic dilatation. Thirty-eight patients (33 M;5 F) with POM from 2005-2018 were included. Diagnosis was based on US distal ureter dilatation (>7 mm), obstructive MAG-3 diuretic renogram and absence of vesicoureteral reflux (cystography). 24 patients were under 1 year of age. All patients underwent cystoscopy and high-pressure balloon dilatation with 3,5 Fr dilating balloon, after ascending pyelography. Median follow-up was of 6.5 years. We identified characteristics with poor prognosis: stenotic punctiform ureteral ostium and/or ostium located in a bladder diverticulum (9 pts) and stenotic tract longer than 1 cm (5 pts). The patients with a stenotic tract shorter than 1 cm (18 pts) were divided into two groups: <5 mm (5 pts) and between 5 and 10 mm (13 pts) showed a good response to dilatation. Endoscopic evaluation of ureteral ostium with pneumatic dilatation when possible is a useful diagnostic and therapeutic solution for POM treatment, especially under one year of age. EHPBD is effective in short stenotic tracts (<5 mm). It may also be repeated with good results in intermediate stenotic sections (5 mm-1 cm). According to our preliminary results, the procedure is more effective if performed earlier (3-7 months of life). Greater cohort and longer follow-up are needed to verify the stability of these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下原发性阻塞性血压计球囊扩张术:方法标准化及预测预后因素。
先天性原发性梗阻性腹股沟(POM)的治疗通常是保守的,特别是在出生后的第一年。内镜下高压球囊扩张术(EHPBD)适用于出现症状、扩张加剧和进行性肾损害的患者,特别是1岁以下的儿童。我们确定并描述了预测内镜扩张成功或失败的内镜预后因素。纳入2005-2018年38例POM患者(33例M;5例F)。诊断基于US输尿管远端扩张(> 7mm),梗阻性MAG-3利尿肾图和无膀胱输尿管反流(膀胱造影)。24例患者年龄在1岁以下。所有患者在上行肾盂造影后均行膀胱镜检查和高压球囊扩张术。中位随访时间为6.5年。我们确定了预后不良的特征:狭窄的点状输尿管口和/或位于膀胱憩室的口(9例)和狭窄的狭窄道长于1cm(5例)。狭窄道短于1cm的患者(18例)分为两组:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica
Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Morbidity related to major lung thoracoscopic resections in children. Satisfaction and results of the subareolar incision as treatment for gynecomastia in adolescents: experience of two centers. Are the complications after laparo-assisted endo-rectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease related to the change of the anal tone? The effect of an educational program on illness uncertainty in mothers of children with type 1 diabetes: a quasi-experimental study. Dysphagia lusoria caused by aberrant right subclavian artery associated with truncus bicaroticus in an 8-month-old girl. Case report and review of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1