A Tale of Specialization in 2 Professions: Comparing the Development of Radiology in Chiropractic and Medicine

Q3 Health Professions Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.echu.2019.09.001
Kenneth J. Young DC, DACBR, PhD
{"title":"A Tale of Specialization in 2 Professions: Comparing the Development of Radiology in Chiropractic and Medicine","authors":"Kenneth J. Young DC, DACBR, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2019.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this article is to describe the development of radiology<span> as a specialty in chiropractic with a comparison to the development of the specialty of radiology in medicine.</span></p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p><span><span>Specialization in medicine has been notably successful, with advanced training and enhanced capabilities in specialized skills leading to better outcomes for patients and increased prestige for practitioners. However, with chiropractic, as with other complementary and alternative medicine<span> professions, no specialization has been recognized within it. Specialist radiology training in chiropractic bears a resemblance to that of medicine, with competitive entry for residencies, certification exams, and the creation of a journal and specialist professional organizations. To facilitate the comparison, I have divided the development of radiology into 4 phases from the chiropractic perspective. Phase 1 started with the discovery of x-rays in 1895, in which medicine adopted them but chiropractic did not. Phase 2 began in 1910 when B. J. Palmer introduced radiography to show chiropractic </span></span>subluxations. Phase 3 started in 1942 when Waldo Poehner advocated for the mainstream diagnostic use of radiography in addition to subluxation analysis. Phase 4 started in 1957 when an examining board for certification in </span>diagnostic radiology<span> was assembled and many chiropractors began to embrace the mainstream medical use of radiography.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this tale of 2 professions, radiology gained official specialty designation in the field of medicine. The medical profession had a monopoly on health care, and thus had few internal and external barriers to overcome. Chiropractic was oppressed by organized medicine, which helped to create the unofficial specialty of chiropractic radiology but which also later helped to limit the specialty. Chiropractic radiology has maintained its independence and autonomy, but also remains on the fringe of mainstream health care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 3-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2019.09.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349919300130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this article is to describe the development of radiology as a specialty in chiropractic with a comparison to the development of the specialty of radiology in medicine.

Discussion

Specialization in medicine has been notably successful, with advanced training and enhanced capabilities in specialized skills leading to better outcomes for patients and increased prestige for practitioners. However, with chiropractic, as with other complementary and alternative medicine professions, no specialization has been recognized within it. Specialist radiology training in chiropractic bears a resemblance to that of medicine, with competitive entry for residencies, certification exams, and the creation of a journal and specialist professional organizations. To facilitate the comparison, I have divided the development of radiology into 4 phases from the chiropractic perspective. Phase 1 started with the discovery of x-rays in 1895, in which medicine adopted them but chiropractic did not. Phase 2 began in 1910 when B. J. Palmer introduced radiography to show chiropractic subluxations. Phase 3 started in 1942 when Waldo Poehner advocated for the mainstream diagnostic use of radiography in addition to subluxation analysis. Phase 4 started in 1957 when an examining board for certification in diagnostic radiology was assembled and many chiropractors began to embrace the mainstream medical use of radiography.

Conclusion

In this tale of 2 professions, radiology gained official specialty designation in the field of medicine. The medical profession had a monopoly on health care, and thus had few internal and external barriers to overcome. Chiropractic was oppressed by organized medicine, which helped to create the unofficial specialty of chiropractic radiology but which also later helped to limit the specialty. Chiropractic radiology has maintained its independence and autonomy, but also remains on the fringe of mainstream health care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个专业专业化的故事:比较脊椎指压治疗和医学放射学的发展
目的本文的目的是描述放射学作为捏脊医学专业的发展,并与放射学作为医学专业的发展进行比较。医学专业化取得了显著的成功,先进的培训和专业技能的增强为患者带来了更好的结果,也增加了从业者的声望。然而,与其他补充和替代医学专业一样,脊椎指压疗法并没有被认可为专业化。脊椎指压治疗的专业放射学培训与医学培训相似,住院医师的竞争、认证考试、期刊和专业组织的创建。为了便于比较,我从捏脊的角度将放射学的发展分为4个阶段。第一阶段始于1895年x射线的发现,当时医学采用了x射线,但脊椎指压疗法却没有。第二阶段开始于1910年,当时B. J. Palmer引入了放射照相技术来显示脊椎指压半脱位。第三阶段开始于1942年,当时Waldo Poehner主张除了半脱位分析外,还使用放射摄影作为主流诊断。第四阶段始于1957年,当时成立了放射诊断认证审查委员会,许多脊医开始接受放射摄影的主流医学应用。结论在这两个专业的故事中,放射学在医学领域获得了正式的专业称号。医疗行业垄断了医疗保健,因此几乎没有需要克服的内部和外部障碍。脊椎指压疗法受到有组织医学的压迫,这有助于创建非官方的脊椎指压放射学专业,但后来也有助于限制该专业。脊椎指压放射学一直保持其独立性和自主性,但也仍然处于主流医疗保健的边缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Masthead Table of Contents Ed Board Research Trends in Dry Needling for Neck Pain Treatment: A Bibliometric Analysis Library as a Therapeutic Landscape Promoting Health and Well-Being to Chiropractic Students: A Descriptive Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1