Investigations on Contamination of Environmental Water Samples by Legionella using Real-Time Quantitative PCR Combined with Amoebic Co-Culturing.

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biocontrol science Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.4265/bio.24.213
Akiko Edagawa, Akio Kimura, Hiroshi Miyamoto
{"title":"Investigations on Contamination of Environmental Water Samples by Legionella using Real-Time Quantitative PCR Combined with Amoebic Co-Culturing.","authors":"Akiko Edagawa,&nbsp;Akio Kimura,&nbsp;Hiroshi Miyamoto","doi":"10.4265/bio.24.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We analyzed the contamination of environmental water samples with Legionella spp. using a conventional culture method, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and real-time qPCR combined with an amoebic co-culture method. Samples (n = 110) were collected from 19 cooling towers, 31 amenity water facilities, and 60 river water sources of tap water in Japan. Legionella was detected in only three samples (3/110, 2.7%) using the culture method. The rate of Legionella detection using amoebic co-culture followed by qPCR was 74.5%, while that using qPCR without amoebic co-culture was 75.5%. A higher than 10-fold bacterial count was observed in 19 samples (19/110, 17.3%) using real-time qPCR subsequent to amoebic co-culture, compared with identical samples analyzed without co-culture. Of these 19 samples, 13 were identified as Legionella spp., including L. pneumophila and L. anisa, and the non-culturable species were identified as L. lytica and L. rowbothamii. This study showed that the detection of Legionella spp., even in those samples where they were not detected by the culture method, was possible using real-time qPCR and an amoebic co-culture method. In addition, this analytical test combination is a useful tool to detect viable and virulent Legionella spp..</p>","PeriodicalId":8777,"journal":{"name":"Biocontrol science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4265/bio.24.213","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biocontrol science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4265/bio.24.213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We analyzed the contamination of environmental water samples with Legionella spp. using a conventional culture method, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and real-time qPCR combined with an amoebic co-culture method. Samples (n = 110) were collected from 19 cooling towers, 31 amenity water facilities, and 60 river water sources of tap water in Japan. Legionella was detected in only three samples (3/110, 2.7%) using the culture method. The rate of Legionella detection using amoebic co-culture followed by qPCR was 74.5%, while that using qPCR without amoebic co-culture was 75.5%. A higher than 10-fold bacterial count was observed in 19 samples (19/110, 17.3%) using real-time qPCR subsequent to amoebic co-culture, compared with identical samples analyzed without co-culture. Of these 19 samples, 13 were identified as Legionella spp., including L. pneumophila and L. anisa, and the non-culturable species were identified as L. lytica and L. rowbothamii. This study showed that the detection of Legionella spp., even in those samples where they were not detected by the culture method, was possible using real-time qPCR and an amoebic co-culture method. In addition, this analytical test combination is a useful tool to detect viable and virulent Legionella spp..

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时荧光定量PCR结合阿米巴共培养法研究军团菌对环境水样的污染。
采用常规培养法、实时定量PCR (qPCR)法和实时定量PCR与阿米巴共培养法对环境水样军团菌污染进行分析。样本(n = 110)来自日本的19座冷却塔、31座市政供水设施和60个自来水河流水源。培养法检出军团菌仅3份(3/110,2.7%)。采用阿米巴共培养qPCR法检出率为74.5%,不采用阿米巴共培养qPCR法检出率为75.5%。与未进行阿米巴共培养的相同样品相比,采用实时荧光定量pcr方法观察到19份样品(19/110,17.3%)的细菌数量高于10倍。19份样品中,军团菌属13种,包括嗜肺军团菌和大毛军团菌,不可培养的菌种为lytica军团菌和rowbothamii军团菌。本研究表明,即使在培养方法未检测到军团菌的样品中,也可以使用实时qPCR和阿米巴共培养方法检测军团菌。此外,该分析试验组合是检测军团菌活菌和毒菌的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biocontrol science
Biocontrol science BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Biocontrol Science provides a medium for the publication of original articles, concise notes, and review articles on all aspects of science and technology of biocontrol.
期刊最新文献
Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by Commercially Available Disinfectants and Cleaners. Remote Bactericidal Effect of Anatase TiO2 Photocatalytic Nanoparticles Annealed with Low-Temperature O2 Plasma. Simple and Rapid Detection of ESBL blaSHV gene from an Urban River in Tokyo by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification. Use of ATP Bioluminescence Assay to Evaluate Oral Streptococci. The Effectiveness of Neutral Electrolyzed Water for Decontaminating the Spray Nozzles of Electric Tankless and Tank-Type Warm-Water Bidet Toilet Seats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1