The optimal degree of lateral wedge insoles for reducing knee joint load: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2019-12-19 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40945-019-0068-1
Vitor Ferreira, Rita Simões, Rui Soles Gonçalves, Leandro Machado, Paulo Roriz
{"title":"The optimal degree of lateral wedge insoles for reducing knee joint load: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Vitor Ferreira,&nbsp;Rita Simões,&nbsp;Rui Soles Gonçalves,&nbsp;Leandro Machado,&nbsp;Paulo Roriz","doi":"10.1186/s40945-019-0068-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral wedge insoles are traditionally used to reduce the adduction moment that crosses the knee during walking in people with medial knee osteoarthritis. However, the best degree to reduce knee joint load is not yet well established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched from their inception until May 2017. Included studies reported on the immediate biomechanical effects of different degrees of lateral wedge insoles during walking in people with knee osteoarthritis. The main measures of interest relating to the biomechanics were the first and second peak of external knee adduction moment and knee adduction angular impulse. For the comparison of the biomechanical effects of different degrees of insoles, the studies were divided in three subgroups: insoles with a degree higher than 0° and equal to or lower than 5°; insoles higher than 5° and equal to or lower than 9°; and insoles higher than 9°. Eligible studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies with a total of 415 participants met all eligibility criteria and were included in the final review and meta-analysis. The overall effect suggests that lateral wedge insoles resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the first peak (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.36, - 0.13; <i>P</i> < 0.001), second peak (SMD -0.26 [95% CI -0.48, - 0.04]; <i>P</i> = 0.02) and knee adduction angular impulse (SMD -0.17 [95% CI -0.31, - 0.03]; P = 0.02). The test of subgroups found no statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that lateral wedge insoles cause an overall slight reduction in the biomechanical parameters. Higher degrees do not show higher reductions than lower degrees. Prior analysis of biomechanical parameters may be a valid option for selecting the optimal angle of wedge that best fits in knee osteoarthritis patients with the lowest possible degree.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"9 ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40945-019-0068-1","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-019-0068-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: Lateral wedge insoles are traditionally used to reduce the adduction moment that crosses the knee during walking in people with medial knee osteoarthritis. However, the best degree to reduce knee joint load is not yet well established.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched from their inception until May 2017. Included studies reported on the immediate biomechanical effects of different degrees of lateral wedge insoles during walking in people with knee osteoarthritis. The main measures of interest relating to the biomechanics were the first and second peak of external knee adduction moment and knee adduction angular impulse. For the comparison of the biomechanical effects of different degrees of insoles, the studies were divided in three subgroups: insoles with a degree higher than 0° and equal to or lower than 5°; insoles higher than 5° and equal to or lower than 9°; and insoles higher than 9°. Eligible studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

Results: Fifteen studies with a total of 415 participants met all eligibility criteria and were included in the final review and meta-analysis. The overall effect suggests that lateral wedge insoles resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the first peak (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.36, - 0.13; P < 0.001), second peak (SMD -0.26 [95% CI -0.48, - 0.04]; P = 0.02) and knee adduction angular impulse (SMD -0.17 [95% CI -0.31, - 0.03]; P = 0.02). The test of subgroups found no statistically significant differences.

Conclusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that lateral wedge insoles cause an overall slight reduction in the biomechanical parameters. Higher degrees do not show higher reductions than lower degrees. Prior analysis of biomechanical parameters may be a valid option for selecting the optimal angle of wedge that best fits in knee osteoarthritis patients with the lowest possible degree.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侧楔鞋垫减轻膝关节负荷的最佳程度:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:外侧楔形鞋垫传统上用于减少膝关节内侧骨关节炎患者行走时穿过膝关节的内收力矩。然而,减少膝关节负荷的最佳程度尚未得到很好的确定。方法:检索自建库至2017年5月的电子数据库。纳入的研究报告了不同程度的侧楔鞋垫对膝关节骨关节炎患者行走时的直接生物力学影响。与生物力学相关的主要测量是膝关节外内收力矩的第一个和第二个峰值以及膝关节内收角脉冲。为了比较不同鞋垫度的生物力学效应,将研究分为三个亚组:鞋垫度大于0°且小于等于5°;鞋垫高于5°且等于或低于9°;鞋垫高于9°。采用随机效应荟萃分析对符合条件的研究进行汇总。结果:15项研究共纳入415名受试者,符合所有入选标准,纳入最终综述和荟萃分析。总体效果表明,侧向楔形鞋垫导致第一个峰值的统计学显著降低(标准化平均差[SMD] -0.25;95%置信区间[CI] -0.36, - 0.13;P P = 0.02)和膝关节内收角冲量(SMD -0.17 [95% CI -0.31, - 0.03];p = 0.02)。亚组测试没有发现统计学上的显著差异。结论:系统回顾和荟萃分析表明,外侧楔形鞋垫会导致生物力学参数的整体轻微降低。高学历并不比低学历表现出更高的还原。预先分析生物力学参数可能是选择最适合膝关节骨性关节炎患者的最佳楔入角度的有效选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Indoor and outdoor 10-Meter Walk Test and Timed Up and Go in patients after total hip arthroplasty: a reliability and comparative study. Erratum in: Pragmatism in manual therapy trials for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of goniometric finger range of motion using a written protocol. A decade of growth: preserving the original meaning of research for physiotherapists. Neurological conditions and community-based physical activity: physical therapists' belief and actions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1