Pharmacist Led Intervention on Inhalation Technique among Asthmatic Patients for Improving Quality of Life in a Private Hospital of Nepal.

IF 2 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2019-11-24 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/8217901
Anita Yadav, Parbati Thapa
{"title":"Pharmacist Led Intervention on Inhalation Technique among Asthmatic Patients for Improving Quality of Life in a Private Hospital of Nepal.","authors":"Anita Yadav,&nbsp;Parbati Thapa","doi":"10.1155/2019/8217901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Asthma is a chronic disease which cannot be cured but can be controlled. Although drug therapy is used to relieve and prevent symptoms of asthma and treat exacerbations, still a good asthma control and a better quality of life in many patients is suboptimal due to improper use of inhalation technique. Thus, this interventional study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a pharmacist intervention on asthma control, quality of life and inhaler technique in adult asthmatic patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 72 patients who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to give written consent were enrolled in the study. These patients were randomly divided into two groups i.e., test group (36) and control group (36) by simple block randomization technique. Test group were the interventional groups. Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and structured questionnaires were used to sort the information like quality of life, asthma control and demographic details. They were counselled by the pharmacist about the asthma management and proper use of inhalers. Out of 72 patients, only forty six patients came for follow up after one month. Data were entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant change was observed in the mean score of quality of life (<i>p</i> = 0.001) in test group as well as control group, however change in the mean score of asthma control in the test group (<i>p</i> = 0.001) was more significant as compared to the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.099). Inhalation technique was found to be improved significantly after intervention among patients using the metered dose inhaler and dry powder inhaler. Majority of the patients were prescribed with Methylxanthines (24.5%) followed by combined Beta 2 agonists and Inhaled Corticosteroids (21.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacist provided intervention improves the quality of life, asthma control and inhalation technique among asthmatic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46434,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/8217901","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8217901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: Asthma is a chronic disease which cannot be cured but can be controlled. Although drug therapy is used to relieve and prevent symptoms of asthma and treat exacerbations, still a good asthma control and a better quality of life in many patients is suboptimal due to improper use of inhalation technique. Thus, this interventional study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a pharmacist intervention on asthma control, quality of life and inhaler technique in adult asthmatic patients.

Patients and methods: A total of 72 patients who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to give written consent were enrolled in the study. These patients were randomly divided into two groups i.e., test group (36) and control group (36) by simple block randomization technique. Test group were the interventional groups. Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and structured questionnaires were used to sort the information like quality of life, asthma control and demographic details. They were counselled by the pharmacist about the asthma management and proper use of inhalers. Out of 72 patients, only forty six patients came for follow up after one month. Data were entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.

Results: A significant change was observed in the mean score of quality of life (p = 0.001) in test group as well as control group, however change in the mean score of asthma control in the test group (p = 0.001) was more significant as compared to the control group (p = 0.099). Inhalation technique was found to be improved significantly after intervention among patients using the metered dose inhaler and dry powder inhaler. Majority of the patients were prescribed with Methylxanthines (24.5%) followed by combined Beta 2 agonists and Inhaled Corticosteroids (21.7%).

Conclusion: Pharmacist provided intervention improves the quality of life, asthma control and inhalation technique among asthmatic patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔一家私立医院药师主导的哮喘患者吸入技术干预改善生活质量。
目的:哮喘是一种不能治愈但可以控制的慢性疾病。虽然药物治疗用于缓解和预防哮喘症状和治疗加重,但由于吸入技术的使用不当,许多患者仍然无法获得良好的哮喘控制和更好的生活质量。因此,本研究旨在评估药师干预对成人哮喘患者哮喘控制、生活质量和吸入器技术的影响。患者和方法:共有72名符合纳入标准并同意给予书面同意的患者入组研究。采用单纯块随机法将患者随机分为试验组(36例)和对照组(36例)。试验组为干预组。采用小型哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ)、哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)和结构化问卷对生活质量、哮喘控制和人口统计学细节等信息进行分类。药剂师向他们提供了哮喘管理和正确使用吸入器的建议。在72例患者中,一个月后只有46例患者来随访。数据输入和分析使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)软件版本20。结果:实验组与对照组的生活质量平均评分差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001),而哮喘控制平均评分差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.099)。使用计量吸入器和干粉吸入器的患者经干预后吸入技术有明显改善。大多数患者使用甲黄嘌呤(24.5%),其次是联合β 2激动剂和吸入皮质类固醇(21.7%)。结论:药师干预改善了哮喘患者的生活质量、哮喘控制和吸入技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonary Medicine
Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Practice Variations in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Children. Dual-Task Performance in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Establishing the Safety and Efficacy of Bedaquiline-Containing Regimen for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Adherence to the ISHLT Protocol for the Referral of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis to the Transplantation Center among of Czech Centers for Interstitial Lung Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1