The Effect of Clinical Characteristics and Subtypes on Amyloid Positivity in Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Dementia and neurocognitive disorders Pub Date : 2019-12-01 Epub Date: 2019-12-13 DOI:10.12779/dnd.2019.18.4.130
Jeong Yeon Kim, Jun Ho Lim, Young Jin Jeong, Do-Young Kang, Kyung Won Park
{"title":"The Effect of Clinical Characteristics and Subtypes on Amyloid Positivity in Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Jeong Yeon Kim,&nbsp;Jun Ho Lim,&nbsp;Young Jin Jeong,&nbsp;Do-Young Kang,&nbsp;Kyung Won Park","doi":"10.12779/dnd.2019.18.4.130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a prodromal stage of dementia. Amyloid deposits in positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging of MCI patients imply a higher risk for advancing to dementia, with rates of 10%-15% yearly. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of subgroups of amnestic MCI (aMCI) that may have a higher impact on amyloid positivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 136 aMCI patients. All patients underwent a 20-minute F-18 florbetaben or flutemetamol PET scan. We classified amyloid PET images as positive or negative according to a semi-quantitative method. We evaluated the amyloid positivity of subgroups of aMCI (early vs. late type, single vs. multiple amnestic type, verbal vs. verbal, and visual amnestic type), and compared baseline clinical characteristics including key risk factors, apolipoprotein E4 (apoE4) genotype, and neuropsychological assessments with amyloid positivity in aMCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amyloid positivity in total aMCI was 41%. The positivity rate according to subgroup of aMCI were as follow: Late aMCI (49%) vs. early aMCI (33%) (<i>p</i>=0.13), multiple aMCI (40%) vs. single aMCI (38%) (<i>p</i>=0.51), and verbal and visual aMCI (59%) vs. verbal aMCI (35%) (<i>p</i>=0.01), respectively. The mean age and the frequency of apoE4 allele of the amyloid-positive group was higher than that of the amyloid-negative group in aMCI (<i>p</i><0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that the amyloid positivity was related to patterns of clinical subtypes, characteristics, and risk factors in patients with aMCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":72779,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","volume":"18 4","pages":"130-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/61/33/dnd-18-130.PMC6946617.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2019.18.4.130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background and purpose: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a prodromal stage of dementia. Amyloid deposits in positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging of MCI patients imply a higher risk for advancing to dementia, with rates of 10%-15% yearly. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of subgroups of amnestic MCI (aMCI) that may have a higher impact on amyloid positivity.

Methods: We recruited 136 aMCI patients. All patients underwent a 20-minute F-18 florbetaben or flutemetamol PET scan. We classified amyloid PET images as positive or negative according to a semi-quantitative method. We evaluated the amyloid positivity of subgroups of aMCI (early vs. late type, single vs. multiple amnestic type, verbal vs. verbal, and visual amnestic type), and compared baseline clinical characteristics including key risk factors, apolipoprotein E4 (apoE4) genotype, and neuropsychological assessments with amyloid positivity in aMCI.

Results: The amyloid positivity in total aMCI was 41%. The positivity rate according to subgroup of aMCI were as follow: Late aMCI (49%) vs. early aMCI (33%) (p=0.13), multiple aMCI (40%) vs. single aMCI (38%) (p=0.51), and verbal and visual aMCI (59%) vs. verbal aMCI (35%) (p=0.01), respectively. The mean age and the frequency of apoE4 allele of the amyloid-positive group was higher than that of the amyloid-negative group in aMCI (p<0.01).

Conclusions: We found that the amyloid positivity was related to patterns of clinical subtypes, characteristics, and risk factors in patients with aMCI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床特征及亚型对健忘轻度认知障碍患者淀粉样蛋白阳性的影响。
背景与目的:轻度认知障碍(Mild cognitive impairment, MCI)是痴呆的前驱阶段。MCI患者正电子发射断层扫描(PET)成像中的淀粉样蛋白沉积表明其发展为痴呆的风险较高,每年的发病率为10%-15%。本研究的目的是研究可能对淀粉样蛋白阳性有较高影响的遗忘性MCI (aMCI)亚组的临床特征。方法:我们招募了136例aMCI患者。所有患者都进行了20分钟的F-18氟倍他本或氟替他莫PET扫描。我们根据半定量方法将淀粉样蛋白PET图像分类为阳性或阴性。我们评估了aMCI亚组(早期与晚期、单一与多重遗忘型、言语与言语、视觉遗忘型)的淀粉样蛋白阳性,并比较了aMCI中淀粉样蛋白阳性的基线临床特征,包括关键危险因素、载脂蛋白E4 (apoE4)基因型和神经心理学评估。结果:总aMCI中淀粉样蛋白阳性占41%。不同aMCI亚组的阳性率分别为:晚期aMCI (49%) vs早期aMCI (33%) (p=0.13),多发性aMCI (40%) vs单一aMCI (38%) (p=0.51),言语和视觉aMCI (59%) vs言语aMCI (35%) (p=0.01)。aMCI中淀粉样蛋白阳性组的平均年龄和apoE4等位基因频率高于淀粉样蛋白阴性组(结论:我们发现淀粉样蛋白阳性与aMCI患者的临床亚型模式、特征和危险因素有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Tablet-Based Seoul Cognitive Status Test: Evidence for Scalable Cognitive Assessment. Effects of a 12-Week Hybrid Analog-Digital Cognitive Training on Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults: A Pilot Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Extensive Cerebral White Matter Involvement and Migrainous Headache in a Patient With Aquaporin-4-Positive NMOSD Mimicking CADASIL. Gait Patterns and Balance Impairment in Parkinson's Disease With Correlation to Disease Severity. Executive Summary of 2025 International Conference of the Korean Dementia Association and International Congress of the Asian Society Against Dementia (IC-KDA/ASAD 2025): A Report From the Academic Committee of the Korean Dementia Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1