Determination and Comparison of Radiation Absorbed dose to the Blood, by Applying Different Techniques, for Patients, Suffering from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

IF 0.5 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-12-31 DOI:10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_118_19
Issa Abdel-Rahman Al-Shakhrah
{"title":"Determination and Comparison of Radiation Absorbed dose to the Blood, by Applying Different Techniques, for Patients, Suffering from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.","authors":"Issa Abdel-Rahman Al-Shakhrah","doi":"10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_118_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation absorbed dose to the red bone marrow, in the therapy of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) with 131I (radioiodine), cannot be measured directly. The absorbed dose to the blood seems to be a good first- order approximation of the radiation absorbed dose to the hematopoietic system and a better means to quantify exposure from therapy than the total amount of activity administered.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this research was to determine the radiation absorbed dose to the blood, for patients suffering from differentiated thyroid cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty seven patients, 22 women and 5 men, suffering from DTC were enrolled in this study. We applied four formulas and we compared between the estimated values of absorbed dose that were obtained by three formulas and those that obtained by fourth (standard one).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the values of absorbed dose that obtained by one of the techniques were regularly highly estimated, even though they have an excellent correlation (99%) with the standard value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Highly overestimated or highly underestimated results that can be obtained by certain method or technique are not desirable, because they tend to exaggerate, by increasing or decreasing, the radiation protection procedures.</p><p><strong>Conversion radiation units: </strong>To convert the values of absorbed dose from S.I unit (mGy/MBq) to traditional unit (rad/mCi), we can simply multiply the values that expressed in S.I units by a factor of 3.7, and we don't need to apply complicated formulas, which were applied by other researches.</p>","PeriodicalId":45830,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6c/c8/IJNM-35-28.PMC6958967.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_118_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiation absorbed dose to the red bone marrow, in the therapy of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) with 131I (radioiodine), cannot be measured directly. The absorbed dose to the blood seems to be a good first- order approximation of the radiation absorbed dose to the hematopoietic system and a better means to quantify exposure from therapy than the total amount of activity administered.

Objective: The aim of this research was to determine the radiation absorbed dose to the blood, for patients suffering from differentiated thyroid cancer.

Materials and methods: Twenty seven patients, 22 women and 5 men, suffering from DTC were enrolled in this study. We applied four formulas and we compared between the estimated values of absorbed dose that were obtained by three formulas and those that obtained by fourth (standard one).

Results: All the values of absorbed dose that obtained by one of the techniques were regularly highly estimated, even though they have an excellent correlation (99%) with the standard value.

Conclusions: Highly overestimated or highly underestimated results that can be obtained by certain method or technique are not desirable, because they tend to exaggerate, by increasing or decreasing, the radiation protection procedures.

Conversion radiation units: To convert the values of absorbed dose from S.I unit (mGy/MBq) to traditional unit (rad/mCi), we can simply multiply the values that expressed in S.I units by a factor of 3.7, and we don't need to apply complicated formulas, which were applied by other researches.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同技术对分化型甲状腺癌患者血液辐射吸收剂量的测定与比较。
背景:放射性碘(131I)治疗分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)时,红骨髓的辐射吸收剂量不能直接测量。对血液的吸收剂量似乎是对造血系统的辐射吸收剂量的一个很好的一阶近似值,并且是一种比给予的总活性量更好的量化治疗暴露的方法。目的:探讨分化型甲状腺癌患者的血液辐射吸收剂量。材料与方法:选取27例DTC患者,其中女性22例,男性5例。我们应用了四种公式,并比较了三种公式和第四种公式(标准公式)所得的吸收剂量估计值。结果:其中一种方法所得的吸收剂量值与标准值有99%的极好的相关性,但均有规律的高估计值。结论:通过某种方法或技术所能获得的结果过高或过低是不可取的,因为它们倾向于通过增加或减少辐射防护程序来夸大效果。转换辐射单位:要将吸收剂量值从S.I单位(mGy/MBq)转换为传统单位(rad/mCi),只需将S.I单位表示的值乘以3.7倍即可,无需采用其他研究采用的复杂公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
18F-FDG PET/CT in a Rare Case of Multiple Parasitic Leiomyomas after Laparoscopic Morcellation. Brown fat FDG Uptake - A Common Finding in FDG PET CT Scan and the Relation to Demographic, Environmental, and Clinical Factors. Comparison of FDOPA and FDG PET in Parkinson's Disease Patients with and without Freezing of Gait. Gastric Adenocarcinoma with Bone Marrow Metastasis. 18F-FDG PET/CT in Lung Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1