Teaching Helping Babies Breathe via Telehealth: A New Application in Rural Guatemala.

Biomedicine Hub Pub Date : 2019-09-24 eCollection Date: 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1159/000502934
Caitlin Jones-Bamman, Susan Niermeyer, Kelly McConnell, John F Thomas, Christina Olson
{"title":"Teaching Helping Babies Breathe via Telehealth: A New Application in Rural Guatemala.","authors":"Caitlin Jones-Bamman,&nbsp;Susan Niermeyer,&nbsp;Kelly McConnell,&nbsp;John F Thomas,&nbsp;Christina Olson","doi":"10.1159/000502934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) is a neonatal resuscitation curriculum that teaches life-saving interventions utilized in the first minutes after birth, reducing morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, it requires in-person facilitators for didactic and hands-on training.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to offer HBB to nurses and nursing students in Guatemala, with the lead facilitator presenting concepts via telehealth and in-person facilitators providing hands-on demonstration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Learners completed pre- and post-tests that included the standard HBB knowledge check, as well as an assessment of the course teaching model. Learners also completed the standard Objective Structured Clinical Evaluations (OSCEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen learners were included in the analysis. All but one learner (94%) passed the course, and the average percent improvement from the pre- to post-test was 12%. All learners achieved passing scores on the OSCEs. Learners responded positively to questions regarding the technology, connection with the instructor, and ability to ask questions. Ninety-four percent of the learners agreed with the statement \"this lecture was as good via telehealth as in person.\" A cost analysis demonstrated approximately USD 3,979.00 in savings using telehealth compared to a standard in-person course.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The telehealth model was successful in delivering course material to the learners and was well received. This model represents a cost-effective way to improve access to HBB. This study may not be generalizable to other populations, and the ability to use telehealth requires reliable internet connectivity, which may not be available in all settings. Further study and expansion of this pilot are needed to assess success in other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9075,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine Hub","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000502934","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine Hub","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000502934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) is a neonatal resuscitation curriculum that teaches life-saving interventions utilized in the first minutes after birth, reducing morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, it requires in-person facilitators for didactic and hands-on training.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to offer HBB to nurses and nursing students in Guatemala, with the lead facilitator presenting concepts via telehealth and in-person facilitators providing hands-on demonstration.

Methods: Learners completed pre- and post-tests that included the standard HBB knowledge check, as well as an assessment of the course teaching model. Learners also completed the standard Objective Structured Clinical Evaluations (OSCEs).

Results: Eighteen learners were included in the analysis. All but one learner (94%) passed the course, and the average percent improvement from the pre- to post-test was 12%. All learners achieved passing scores on the OSCEs. Learners responded positively to questions regarding the technology, connection with the instructor, and ability to ask questions. Ninety-four percent of the learners agreed with the statement "this lecture was as good via telehealth as in person." A cost analysis demonstrated approximately USD 3,979.00 in savings using telehealth compared to a standard in-person course.

Conclusions: The telehealth model was successful in delivering course material to the learners and was well received. This model represents a cost-effective way to improve access to HBB. This study may not be generalizable to other populations, and the ability to use telehealth requires reliable internet connectivity, which may not be available in all settings. Further study and expansion of this pilot are needed to assess success in other settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过远程医疗教学帮助婴儿呼吸:在危地马拉农村的新应用。
背景:帮助婴儿呼吸(HBB)是一门新生儿复苏课程,教授在出生后最初几分钟使用的挽救生命的干预措施,降低发病率和死亡率。传统上,它需要面对面的辅导员进行教学和实践培训。目的:本研究的目的是向危地马拉的护士和护理学生提供HBB,主要主持人通过远程医疗介绍概念,现场主持人提供实际演示。方法:学习者完成前、后测试,包括标准的HBB知识测试和课程教学模式评估。学习者还完成了标准的客观结构化临床评估(oses)。结果:18名学习者被纳入分析。除了一名学习者(94%)之外,其余的人都通过了课程,从测试前到测试后的平均改善率为12%。所有学员在欧安考试中均取得及格成绩。学习者对有关技术、与教师的联系以及提问能力的问题做出了积极的回应。94%的学习者同意“这个讲座通过远程医疗和亲自授课一样好”的说法。成本分析表明,与标准的面对面课程相比,使用远程保健可节省约3 979美元。结论:远程医疗模式成功地将课程材料传递给学习者,并获得了良好的反响。这种模式代表了一种经济有效的方式来改善获得HBB。这项研究可能不能推广到其他人群,并且使用远程医疗的能力需要可靠的互联网连接,这可能不是在所有环境中都可用。需要进一步研究和扩大这一试点,以评估在其他情况下的成功情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Folate Receptor Beta Signaling in the Regulation of Macrophage Antimicrobial Immune Response: A Scoping Review Estimation of the Variance Components in TP53 mRNA Expression in the Rat Lens after in vivo Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation B. Physical Activity among Primary Health Care Physicians and Its Impact on Counseling Practices. A Potential Off-Target Effect of the Wnt/β-Catenin Inhibitor KYA1797K: PD-L1 Binding and Checkpoint Inhibition. Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1