Exploring the influence of the nursing and medical professions on policy and politics.

David Benton, Stephanie Ferguson, Mercedes Gómez Del Pulgar
{"title":"Exploring the influence of the nursing and medical professions on policy and politics.","authors":"David Benton,&nbsp;Stephanie Ferguson,&nbsp;Mercedes Gómez Del Pulgar","doi":"10.7748/nm.2020.e1896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Nursing Now global campaign is aimed at raising the profile of nursing and its influence on policy and politics. Calls for the profession to have an increased role in policymaking are not new, but recent developments offer significant opportunities to advance this message.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare and contrast the published scholarly evidence, indexed in Web of Science (WoS), relating to how medicine and nursing influence policy and politics.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A bibliometric analysis of scholarship was undertaken to determine how medicine and nursing influence policy and politics. Indexed articles in Web of Science were compared to examine the evolution of scholarly contributions by both professions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Since 1990, nursing and medicine have been consistent contributors to scholarship on policy and politics. At the same time, there has been an exponential growth in scholarly output, but nursing is now starting to fall behind. Nursing has focused on the necessary knowledge and skills, whereas medicine has focused on acting on specific issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are multiple opportunities for nursing scholars to accelerate their indexed output to inform evidence-based advocacy, and influence policy and politics. These endeavours will increase their potential to inform future healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":74325,"journal":{"name":"Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)","volume":"27 1","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nm.2020.e1896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The Nursing Now global campaign is aimed at raising the profile of nursing and its influence on policy and politics. Calls for the profession to have an increased role in policymaking are not new, but recent developments offer significant opportunities to advance this message.

Aim: To compare and contrast the published scholarly evidence, indexed in Web of Science (WoS), relating to how medicine and nursing influence policy and politics.

Method: A bibliometric analysis of scholarship was undertaken to determine how medicine and nursing influence policy and politics. Indexed articles in Web of Science were compared to examine the evolution of scholarly contributions by both professions.

Results: Since 1990, nursing and medicine have been consistent contributors to scholarship on policy and politics. At the same time, there has been an exponential growth in scholarly output, but nursing is now starting to fall behind. Nursing has focused on the necessary knowledge and skills, whereas medicine has focused on acting on specific issues.

Conclusion: There are multiple opportunities for nursing scholars to accelerate their indexed output to inform evidence-based advocacy, and influence policy and politics. These endeavours will increase their potential to inform future healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索护理和医疗专业对政策和政治的影响。
背景:护理现在全球运动旨在提高护理的形象及其对政策和政治的影响。呼吁该专业在政策制定中发挥更大作用并不是什么新鲜事,但最近的事态发展为推进这一信息提供了重要机会。目的:比较和对比Web of Science (WoS)收录的有关医学和护理如何影响政策和政治的已发表学术证据。方法:采用文献计量学方法分析医学和护理对政策和政治的影响。对Web of Science上的索引文章进行了比较,以检查两种职业的学术贡献的演变。结果:自1990年以来,护理和医学一直是政策和政治学术的持续贡献者。与此同时,学术产出呈指数级增长,但护理学现在开始落后。护理侧重于必要的知识和技能,而医学侧重于针对具体问题采取行动。结论:护理学者有多种机会加快其索引输出,为循证倡导提供信息,并影响政策和政治。这些努力将增加它们为未来医疗保健提供信息的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coaching members of the healthcare team to improve care provision. Identifying and addressing the challenges experienced by nursing associates. Concerns about practice: supporting staff by fostering a climate of psychological safety. Managing uncivil behaviour in the workplace. How to implement compassionate leadership in nursing teams.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1