Sex Differences in Use of Smoking Cessation Services and Resources: A Real-World Study.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2020-01-22 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X20901500
Navitha Jayakumar, Michael Chaiton, Bo Zhang, Peter Selby, Robert Schwartz
{"title":"Sex Differences in Use of Smoking Cessation Services and Resources: A Real-World Study.","authors":"Navitha Jayakumar,&nbsp;Michael Chaiton,&nbsp;Bo Zhang,&nbsp;Peter Selby,&nbsp;Robert Schwartz","doi":"10.1177/1179173X20901500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Smoking cessation interventions with sex considerations have been found to effectively increase cessation rates. However, evidence is limited and weak. This study examined sex differences in the use of smoking cessation services or resources among Ontario adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the Smokers' Panel, an ongoing online survey of Ontario adult smokers and recent quitters. The analysis included 1009 male and 1765 female participants. Bivariate analysis was used to examine differences in sociodemographic characteristics and smoking-related variables by use of cessation services/resources. Logistic regression was then used to identify sociodemographic characteristics and smoking-related variables associated with the use of cessation services/resources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis shows that there were significant sex differences in the use of individual interventions. Female participants were more likely to use nicotine patch (63% vs 58%; adjusted odds ratio, AOR: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.67), varenicline (29% vs 24%; AOR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.13-1.66), Smokers' Helpline phone (14% vs 10%; AOR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07-1.79), Smokers' Helpline online (27% vs 21%; AOR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.18-1.74), self-help materials (23% vs 16%; AOR: 1.81 95% CI: 1.46-2.26), and alternative methods (23% vs 19%; AOR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73) compared with male participants, after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent with other findings, the study shows sex differences in the use of smoking cessation services or resources among adult smokers. Women are more likely to use recommended cessation resources such as nicotine patch, varenicline, and Smokers' Helpline than men. Health professionals should use this increased willingness to help female smokers quit. However, men may be underserved and more men-specific interventions need to be developed and evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179173X20901500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179173X20901500","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X20901500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objectives: Smoking cessation interventions with sex considerations have been found to effectively increase cessation rates. However, evidence is limited and weak. This study examined sex differences in the use of smoking cessation services or resources among Ontario adults.

Methods: Data are from the Smokers' Panel, an ongoing online survey of Ontario adult smokers and recent quitters. The analysis included 1009 male and 1765 female participants. Bivariate analysis was used to examine differences in sociodemographic characteristics and smoking-related variables by use of cessation services/resources. Logistic regression was then used to identify sociodemographic characteristics and smoking-related variables associated with the use of cessation services/resources.

Results: The analysis shows that there were significant sex differences in the use of individual interventions. Female participants were more likely to use nicotine patch (63% vs 58%; adjusted odds ratio, AOR: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.67), varenicline (29% vs 24%; AOR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.13-1.66), Smokers' Helpline phone (14% vs 10%; AOR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07-1.79), Smokers' Helpline online (27% vs 21%; AOR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.18-1.74), self-help materials (23% vs 16%; AOR: 1.81 95% CI: 1.46-2.26), and alternative methods (23% vs 19%; AOR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73) compared with male participants, after adjusting for covariates.

Conclusion: Consistent with other findings, the study shows sex differences in the use of smoking cessation services or resources among adult smokers. Women are more likely to use recommended cessation resources such as nicotine patch, varenicline, and Smokers' Helpline than men. Health professionals should use this increased willingness to help female smokers quit. However, men may be underserved and more men-specific interventions need to be developed and evaluated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用戒烟服务和资源的性别差异:一项真实世界的研究。
目的:研究发现,考虑性别因素的戒烟干预措施可有效提高戒烟率。然而,证据是有限和薄弱的。这项研究调查了安大略省成年人在使用戒烟服务或资源方面的性别差异。方法:数据来自吸烟者小组,这是一项正在进行的安大略省成年吸烟者和最近戒烟者的在线调查。该分析包括1009名男性和1765名女性参与者。双变量分析用于通过使用戒烟服务/资源来检查社会人口学特征和吸烟相关变量的差异。然后使用逻辑回归来确定与使用戒烟服务/资源相关的社会人口学特征和吸烟相关变量。结果:分析表明,个体干预的使用存在显著的性别差异。女性参与者更倾向于使用尼古丁贴片(63% vs 58%;调整优势比,AOR: 1.39, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.16-1.67),伐尼克兰(29% vs 24%;AOR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.13-1.66),吸烟者热线电话(14%对10%;AOR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07-1.79),吸烟者在线帮助热线(27% vs 21%;AOR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.18-1.74),自助材料(23% vs 16%;AOR: 1.81 95% CI: 1.46-2.26)和替代方法(23% vs 19%;校正协变量后,AOR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73)。结论:与其他研究结果一致,该研究显示了成年吸烟者在使用戒烟服务或资源方面的性别差异。女性比男性更有可能使用推荐的戒烟资源,如尼古丁贴片、伐尼克兰和吸烟者帮助热线。卫生专业人员应该利用这种增加的意愿来帮助女性吸烟者戒烟。然而,男性可能得不到充分的服务,需要制定和评估更多针对男性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Patterns and Perception of Nicotine Pouches Use Among Adults in Saudi Arabia. Geographic Representativeness of a Digital Tobacco Cessation Intervention: An Exploration of Changes in Rural Reach From 2013-2020. Proactive Text Messaging Outreach for Tobacco Cessation Among Patients With COPD Who Smoke: A Randomized Pilot. No Change in Illicit Tobacco Use Following the Introduction of Standardised Packaging? A Longitudinal Online Survey in the United Kingdom. Challenges Related to Overcoming Addiction: Assessing Motivation and Readiness to Quit or Reduce Cigarette Smoking.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1