Power and Sample Size for Fixed-Effects Inference in Reversible Linear Mixed Models.

IF 1.8 4区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY American Statistician Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-06-04 DOI:10.1080/00031305.2017.1415972
Yueh-Yun Chi, Deborah H Glueck, Keith E Muller
{"title":"Power and Sample Size for Fixed-Effects Inference in Reversible Linear Mixed Models.","authors":"Yueh-Yun Chi,&nbsp;Deborah H Glueck,&nbsp;Keith E Muller","doi":"10.1080/00031305.2017.1415972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the popularity of the general linear mixed model for data analysis, power and sample size methods and software are not generally available for commonly used test statistics and reference distributions. Statisticians resort to simulations with homegrown and uncertified programs or rough approximations which are misaligned with the data analysis. For a wide range of designs with longitudinal and clustering features, we provide accurate power and sample size approximations for inference about fixed effects in linear models we call reversible. We show that under widely applicable conditions, the general linear mixed-model Wald test has non-central distributions equivalent to well-studied multivariate tests. In turn, exact and approximate power and sample size results for the multivariate Hotelling-Lawley test provide exact and approximate power and sample size results for the mixed-model Wald test. The calculations are easily computed with a free, open-source product that requires only a web browser to use. Commercial software can be used for a smaller range of reversible models. Simple approximations allow accounting for modest amounts of missing data. A real-world example illustrates the methods. Sample size results are presented for a multicenter study on pregnancy. The proposed study, an extension of a funded project, has clustering within clinic. Exchangeability among participants allows averaging across them to remove the clustering structure. The resulting simplified design is a single level longitudinal study. Multivariate methods for power provide an approximate sample size. All proofs and inputs for the example are in the Supplementary Materials (available online).</p>","PeriodicalId":50801,"journal":{"name":"American Statistician","volume":"73 4","pages":"350-359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00031305.2017.1415972","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Statistician","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1415972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Despite the popularity of the general linear mixed model for data analysis, power and sample size methods and software are not generally available for commonly used test statistics and reference distributions. Statisticians resort to simulations with homegrown and uncertified programs or rough approximations which are misaligned with the data analysis. For a wide range of designs with longitudinal and clustering features, we provide accurate power and sample size approximations for inference about fixed effects in linear models we call reversible. We show that under widely applicable conditions, the general linear mixed-model Wald test has non-central distributions equivalent to well-studied multivariate tests. In turn, exact and approximate power and sample size results for the multivariate Hotelling-Lawley test provide exact and approximate power and sample size results for the mixed-model Wald test. The calculations are easily computed with a free, open-source product that requires only a web browser to use. Commercial software can be used for a smaller range of reversible models. Simple approximations allow accounting for modest amounts of missing data. A real-world example illustrates the methods. Sample size results are presented for a multicenter study on pregnancy. The proposed study, an extension of a funded project, has clustering within clinic. Exchangeability among participants allows averaging across them to remove the clustering structure. The resulting simplified design is a single level longitudinal study. Multivariate methods for power provide an approximate sample size. All proofs and inputs for the example are in the Supplementary Materials (available online).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可逆线性混合模型中固定效应推断的功率和样本量。
尽管用于数据分析的一般线性混合模型很受欢迎,但对于常用的检验统计和参考分布,功率和样本量方法和软件通常不可用。统计学家求助于模拟与本地和未经认证的程序或粗略的近似值与数据分析不一致。对于具有纵向和聚类特征的广泛设计,我们提供了精确的功率和样本量近似,用于推断线性模型中我们称之为可逆的固定效应。我们证明,在广泛适用的条件下,一般的线性混合模型Wald检验具有非中心分布,相当于经过充分研究的多变量检验。反过来,多元Hotelling-Lawley检验的准确和近似的功率和样本量结果为混合模型Wald检验提供了准确和近似的功率和样本量结果。这些计算很容易用一个免费的、开源的产品来计算,只需要一个网络浏览器就可以使用。商业软件可用于较小范围的可逆模型。简单的近似可以解释少量的丢失数据。一个真实的例子说明了这些方法。样本量结果提出了一个多中心研究的妊娠。拟议的研究是一个资助项目的延伸,在诊所内聚类。参与者之间的互换性允许在它们之间进行平均,以消除集群结构。由此产生的简化设计是单水平纵向研究。功率的多变量方法提供了一个近似的样本量。示例的所有证明和输入都在补充材料中(在线提供)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Statistician
American Statistician 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Are you looking for general-interest articles about current national and international statistical problems and programs; interesting and fun articles of a general nature about statistics and its applications; or the teaching of statistics? Then you are looking for The American Statistician (TAS), published quarterly by the American Statistical Association. TAS contains timely articles organized into the following sections: Statistical Practice, General, Teacher''s Corner, History Corner, Interdisciplinary, Statistical Computing and Graphics, Reviews of Books and Teaching Materials, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Causal Inference with Complex Surveys: A Unified Perspective on Sample Selection and Exposure Selection Performance Analysis of NSUM Estimators in Social-Network Topologies Cross-validatory Z-Residual for Diagnosing Shared Frailty Models A Pareto tail plot without moment restrictions Sparse-group boosting: Unbiased group and variable selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1