Environmental Health Equity: A Concept Analysis.

Teresa Dodd-Butera, Margaret Beaman, Marissa Brash
{"title":"Environmental Health Equity: A Concept Analysis.","authors":"Teresa Dodd-Butera,&nbsp;Margaret Beaman,&nbsp;Marissa Brash","doi":"10.1891/0739-6686.38.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public health practice and ethics address both individual and environmental health, in order to optimize the well-being of an entire population. Consideration of environmental health equity (EHE) is an evolving component of environmental ethics and public health, with evidence of disparities in exposure to vulnerable communities. Related terms for studying EHE include elements of justice, social determinants of health (SDOH), disparities, and environmental racism. The unequal protection from environmental exposures, specifically considering vulnerable and marginalized populations is significant to science, society, and health. Analyzing the environmental impact includes examining equity principles to assist policy and decision-making in the public arena, in order to address unfair burdens placed on vulnerable populations. However, the lack of a common and precise term for the idea makes it to instruct and evaluate the experiences of inequities in diverse populations. The purpose of this research is to use a concept analysis to examine the idea, utility, and conditions surrounding \"EHE\" for use in public health, nursing, environmental ethics, policy development, and interprofessional collaboration. A concept analysis will be conducted following the eight-step method developed by Walker and Avant (2011) Data sources will include empirical and descriptive literature; and the results will identify defining attributes of the concept. A set of operationalized standards for EHE is established through this concept analysis. This study proposes an examination of the concept in order to assess and evaluate the ethics and experiences in EHE, and determine how this impacts population health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":35733,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of nursing research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/0739-6686.38.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Public health practice and ethics address both individual and environmental health, in order to optimize the well-being of an entire population. Consideration of environmental health equity (EHE) is an evolving component of environmental ethics and public health, with evidence of disparities in exposure to vulnerable communities. Related terms for studying EHE include elements of justice, social determinants of health (SDOH), disparities, and environmental racism. The unequal protection from environmental exposures, specifically considering vulnerable and marginalized populations is significant to science, society, and health. Analyzing the environmental impact includes examining equity principles to assist policy and decision-making in the public arena, in order to address unfair burdens placed on vulnerable populations. However, the lack of a common and precise term for the idea makes it to instruct and evaluate the experiences of inequities in diverse populations. The purpose of this research is to use a concept analysis to examine the idea, utility, and conditions surrounding "EHE" for use in public health, nursing, environmental ethics, policy development, and interprofessional collaboration. A concept analysis will be conducted following the eight-step method developed by Walker and Avant (2011) Data sources will include empirical and descriptive literature; and the results will identify defining attributes of the concept. A set of operationalized standards for EHE is established through this concept analysis. This study proposes an examination of the concept in order to assess and evaluate the ethics and experiences in EHE, and determine how this impacts population health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境健康公平:一个概念分析。
公共卫生实践和伦理涉及个人和环境健康,以优化全体人民的福祉。考虑环境卫生公平(EHE)是环境伦理和公共卫生的一个不断发展的组成部分,有证据表明脆弱社区的暴露程度存在差异。研究EHE的相关术语包括正义要素、健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)、差异和环境种族主义。对环境暴露的不平等保护,特别是考虑到脆弱和边缘化人群,对科学、社会和健康具有重要意义。分析环境影响包括审查公平原则,以协助公共领域的政策和决策,以解决对弱势群体施加的不公平负担。然而,由于缺乏一个共同而精确的术语来描述这一概念,使得它无法指导和评估不同人群对不平等的体验。本研究的目的是使用概念分析来检验“EHE”在公共卫生、护理、环境伦理、政策制定和跨专业合作中的概念、效用和条件。概念分析将按照Walker和Avant(2011)开发的八步方法进行。数据来源将包括实证和描述性文献;结果将确定概念的定义属性。通过这一概念分析,建立了一套可操作的EHE标准。本研究建议对这一概念进行审查,以评估和评价EHE的伦理和经验,并确定这如何影响人口健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annual review of nursing research
Annual review of nursing research Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This landmark annual review has provided nearly three decades of knowledge, insight, and research on topics critical to nurses everywhere. The purpose of this annual review is to critically examine the full gamut of literature on key topics in nursing practice, including nursing theory, care delivery, nursing education, and the professional aspects of nursing. Past volumes of ARNR have addressed critical issues such as: •Pediatric care •Complementary and alternative health •Chronic illness •Geriatrics •Alcohol abuse •Patient safety •Rural nursing •Tobacco use
期刊最新文献
Simulation in Undergraduate Education. State of Simulation Research in Advanced Practice Nursing Education. Human Simulation in Nursing Education. Hospital-Based Simulation. Interprofessional Simulation: From the Classroom to Clinical Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1