Compatibility of pulse-pulse intervals with R-R intervals in assessing cardiac autonomic function and its relation to risks of atherosclerosis.

Ci ji yi xue za zhi = Tzu-chi medical journal Pub Date : 2019-02-20 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_68_18
Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Cyuan-Cin Liu, Wei-Min Liu, Hsien-Tsai Wu, Ruay-Ming Huang, An-Bang Liu
{"title":"Compatibility of pulse-pulse intervals with R-R intervals in assessing cardiac autonomic function and its relation to risks of atherosclerosis.","authors":"Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Cyuan-Cin Liu, Wei-Min Liu, Hsien-Tsai Wu, Ruay-Ming Huang, An-Bang Liu","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_68_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis using electrocardiographic R-R intervals (RRIs) in either a time or a frequency domain is a useful tool for assessing cardiac autonomic dysfunction in clinical research. For convenience, pulse-pulse intervals (PPIs) acquired by photoplethysmography have been used to assess HRV. However, the compatibility of PPI with RRI is controversial.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, we investigated the compatibility of PPI with RRI in five groups of participants, including nonoverweight young individuals with a body mass index (BMI) <24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (Group 1, <i>n</i> = 20, aged 18-40 years), overweight young individuals with a BMI ≥24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (Group 2, <i>n</i> = 13, aged 21-38 years), nonoverweight upper middle-aged individuals with a BMI <24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (Group 3, <i>n</i> = 21, aged 45-89 years), overweight upper middle-aged individuals with a BMI ≥24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (Group 4, <i>n</i> = 14, aged 43-74 years), and diabetic patients with a BMI ≥24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (Group 5, <i>n</i> = 19, aged 35-74 years). We then used cross-approximate entropy (CAE) to assess the compatibility between RRI and PPI and analyzed HRV in the time and frequency domains derived from PPR and RRI with traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CAE values in Group 1 were significantly lower than those in Group 2 (1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 1.78 ± 0.15, <i>P</i> = 0.041), Group 3 (1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 2.05 ± 0.27, <i>P</i> < 0.001), Group 4 (1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 1.87 ± 0.23, <i>P</i> = 0.023), and Group 5 (1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 2.09 ± 0.23, <i>P</i> < 0.001). There were no significant differences in HRV acquired by PPI and RRI, except for proportion of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms in the entire recording in Group 1. All HRVs derived from PPI were different from those acquired from RRI in the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPI may be an alternative parameter for effectively assessing cardiac autonomic function in nonoverweight healthy individuals. It should be used carefully in overweight, elderly, or diabetic individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":72593,"journal":{"name":"Ci ji yi xue za zhi = Tzu-chi medical journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"41-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/57/ad/TCMJ-32-41.PMC7015001.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ci ji yi xue za zhi = Tzu-chi medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_68_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis using electrocardiographic R-R intervals (RRIs) in either a time or a frequency domain is a useful tool for assessing cardiac autonomic dysfunction in clinical research. For convenience, pulse-pulse intervals (PPIs) acquired by photoplethysmography have been used to assess HRV. However, the compatibility of PPI with RRI is controversial.

Materials and methods: In this study, we investigated the compatibility of PPI with RRI in five groups of participants, including nonoverweight young individuals with a body mass index (BMI) <24 kg/m2 (Group 1, n = 20, aged 18-40 years), overweight young individuals with a BMI ≥24 kg/m2 (Group 2, n = 13, aged 21-38 years), nonoverweight upper middle-aged individuals with a BMI <24 kg/m2 (Group 3, n = 21, aged 45-89 years), overweight upper middle-aged individuals with a BMI ≥24 kg/m2 (Group 4, n = 14, aged 43-74 years), and diabetic patients with a BMI ≥24 kg/m2 (Group 5, n = 19, aged 35-74 years). We then used cross-approximate entropy (CAE) to assess the compatibility between RRI and PPI and analyzed HRV in the time and frequency domains derived from PPR and RRI with traditional methods.

Results: The CAE values in Group 1 were significantly lower than those in Group 2 (1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 1.78 ± 0.15, P = 0.041), Group 3 (1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 2.05 ± 0.27, P < 0.001), Group 4 (1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 1.87 ± 0.23, P = 0.023), and Group 5 (1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 2.09 ± 0.23, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in HRV acquired by PPI and RRI, except for proportion of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms in the entire recording in Group 1. All HRVs derived from PPI were different from those acquired from RRI in the other groups.

Conclusion: PPI may be an alternative parameter for effectively assessing cardiac autonomic function in nonoverweight healthy individuals. It should be used carefully in overweight, elderly, or diabetic individuals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脉搏-脉搏间期与 R-R 间期在评估心脏自律神经功能方面的兼容性及其与动脉粥样硬化风险的关系。
目的:使用时域或频域心电图 R-R 间期(RRIs)分析心率变异性(HRV)是临床研究中评估心脏自主神经功能障碍的有用工具。为方便起见,人们使用光电血压计获取的脉搏-脉搏间期(PPI)来评估心率变异。然而,PPI 与 RRI 的兼容性还存在争议:体重指数为 2 的非超重中上层人士(第 3 组,n = 21,年龄 45-89 岁)、体重指数≥24 kg/m2 的超重中上层人士(第 4 组,n = 14,年龄 43-74 岁)以及体重指数≥24 kg/m2 的糖尿病患者(第 5 组,n = 19,年龄 35-74 岁)。然后,我们使用交叉近似熵(CAE)评估了 RRI 和 PPI 的兼容性,并用传统方法分析了从 PPR 和 RRI 得出的时域和频域心率变异:第1组的CAE值明显低于第2组(1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 1.78 ± 0.15,P = 0.041)、第3组(1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 2.05 ± 0.27,P < 0.001)、第4组(1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 1.87 ± 0.23,P = 0.023)和第5组(1.68 ± 0.16 vs. 2.09 ± 0.23,P < 0.001)。除了第 1 组在整个记录中相邻 NN 间期相差 50 毫秒以上的比例外,PPI 和 RRI 获得的心率变异无明显差异:结论:PPI 可能是有效评估非超重健康人心脏自律神经功能的替代参数。结论:对于非超重的健康人,PPI 可能是有效评估心脏自律神经功能的替代参数,但对于超重、老年人或糖尿病患者,则应谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dancing pharynx. Prevalence and correlates of antenatal depression among women registered at antenatal clinic in North India. Targeting of interleukin-10 receptor by a potential human interleukin-10 peptide efficiently blocks interleukin-10 pathway-dependent cell proliferation. Association of bone mineral density and trabecular bone score with cardiovascular disease. Is there a role for oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in age-associated bladder disorders?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1