Burcak E Tasdogan, Michelle Ma, Cem Simsek, Behnam Saberi, Ahmet Gurakar
{"title":"Update on Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation.","authors":"Burcak E Tasdogan, Michelle Ma, Cem Simsek, Behnam Saberi, Ahmet Gurakar","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The standard therapy for decompensated end-stage chronic liver disease of any etiology and acute fulminant hepatic failure is liver transplantation (LT). Advances in immunosuppressive therapy decreased the rates of acute and chronic rejections. Thus, graft and patient survivals have significantly improved. However, long-term adverse effects of prolonged use of immunosuppressive agents such as malignancies, opportunistic infections, metabolic disorders, and other organ toxicities have now become a major concern. Consequently, alternative approaches are needed to deescalate the customary drugs and their side effects. Therapy must be individualized and additional preventive measures should be taken by patients with particular risk factors or predisposed to certain adverse effects. Current opinion favors a combination of agents with different mechanism of actions and toxicity profiles. Corticosteroids are employed in immediate and early postoperative period. Although they have a pronounced side effect profile, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are still the backbone of early and late phase immunosuppressive regimens because of their proved efficacy. Antimetabolites are frequent choices for steroid and/or CNI-sparing strategies. Studies also have established a role for mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors in specific groups of recipients. Biologic agents are a hot topic of interest and made their way into current strategies for induction. Agents extrapolated from other transplantation or immunologic experience are being evaluated.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Tasdogan BE, Ma M, Simsek C, <i>et al</i>. Update on Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2019;9(2):96-101.</p>","PeriodicalId":11992,"journal":{"name":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","volume":"9 2","pages":"96-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/ae/ejohg-9-96.PMC7047305.pdf","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23
Abstract
The standard therapy for decompensated end-stage chronic liver disease of any etiology and acute fulminant hepatic failure is liver transplantation (LT). Advances in immunosuppressive therapy decreased the rates of acute and chronic rejections. Thus, graft and patient survivals have significantly improved. However, long-term adverse effects of prolonged use of immunosuppressive agents such as malignancies, opportunistic infections, metabolic disorders, and other organ toxicities have now become a major concern. Consequently, alternative approaches are needed to deescalate the customary drugs and their side effects. Therapy must be individualized and additional preventive measures should be taken by patients with particular risk factors or predisposed to certain adverse effects. Current opinion favors a combination of agents with different mechanism of actions and toxicity profiles. Corticosteroids are employed in immediate and early postoperative period. Although they have a pronounced side effect profile, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are still the backbone of early and late phase immunosuppressive regimens because of their proved efficacy. Antimetabolites are frequent choices for steroid and/or CNI-sparing strategies. Studies also have established a role for mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors in specific groups of recipients. Biologic agents are a hot topic of interest and made their way into current strategies for induction. Agents extrapolated from other transplantation or immunologic experience are being evaluated.
How to cite this article: Tasdogan BE, Ma M, Simsek C, et al. Update on Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2019;9(2):96-101.
任何病因的失代偿终末期慢性肝病和急性暴发性肝衰竭的标准治疗是肝移植(LT)。免疫抑制疗法的进步降低了急性和慢性排斥反应的发生率。因此,移植物和病人的存活率有了显著的提高。然而,长期使用免疫抑制剂的长期副作用,如恶性肿瘤、机会性感染、代谢紊乱和其他器官毒性,现在已成为一个主要关注的问题。因此,需要其他方法来降低常用药物及其副作用。治疗必须个体化,对于有特殊危险因素或易发生某些不良反应的患者,应采取额外的预防措施。目前的观点倾向于使用具有不同作用机制和毒性特征的药物组合。术后即刻和早期使用皮质类固醇。尽管钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNIs)具有明显的副作用,但由于其已证实的有效性,它们仍然是早期和晚期免疫抑制方案的骨干。抗代谢物是类固醇和/或cni保护策略的常用选择。研究还确定了哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶点(mTOR)抑制剂在特定受体群体中的作用。生物制剂是人们感兴趣的一个热门话题,并已成为当前诱导策略的一部分。正在评估从其他移植或免疫经验推断出的药物。如何引用本文:Tasdogan BE, Ma M, Simsek C,等。肝移植免疫抑制研究进展中华肝病与胃肠病杂志2019;9(2):96-101。