[Chemical risks in research laboratories].

IF 0.4 Q3 Medicine Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia Pub Date : 2019-12-01
Domenico M Cavallo, Andrea Cattaneo, Andrea Spinazzè
{"title":"[Chemical risks in research laboratories].","authors":"Domenico M Cavallo,&nbsp;Andrea Cattaneo,&nbsp;Andrea Spinazzè","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Research laboratories represent peculiar employment realities, generally characterized by the use of reduced volumes of several chemicals, often used in mixture, thus defining a potential exposure to multiple chemical agents. Methods. The aim of the study is to provide a brief review of the most widely used methods for assessing chemical risk in laboratories, with particular emphasis on their limits and advantages. Results. The approach most often used for assessing chemical risk in research laboratories involves the use of a qualitative modeling approach for risk assessment or quantitative exposure assessment tools. Conclusions. Chemical risk assessment algorithms represent a useful solution for the purposes of the initial screening for the assessment of chemical risk in research laboratories: their ease of use makes them easily accessible, but on the other hand does not allow to take into proper consideration the particularities of the assessed exposure scenarios. Regarding the exposure estimation models, although these instruments have a wide range of applicability, there is no solid and complete validation, which evaluates the accuracy and reliability for this peculiar type of exposure scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":12674,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","volume":"41 4","pages":"346-348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Research laboratories represent peculiar employment realities, generally characterized by the use of reduced volumes of several chemicals, often used in mixture, thus defining a potential exposure to multiple chemical agents. Methods. The aim of the study is to provide a brief review of the most widely used methods for assessing chemical risk in laboratories, with particular emphasis on their limits and advantages. Results. The approach most often used for assessing chemical risk in research laboratories involves the use of a qualitative modeling approach for risk assessment or quantitative exposure assessment tools. Conclusions. Chemical risk assessment algorithms represent a useful solution for the purposes of the initial screening for the assessment of chemical risk in research laboratories: their ease of use makes them easily accessible, but on the other hand does not allow to take into proper consideration the particularities of the assessed exposure scenarios. Regarding the exposure estimation models, although these instruments have a wide range of applicability, there is no solid and complete validation, which evaluates the accuracy and reliability for this peculiar type of exposure scenarios.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[研究实验室的化学品风险]。
摘要:研究实验室代表着特殊的就业现实,其一般特点是使用少量的几种化学品,通常是混合使用,从而确定可能接触多种化学剂。方法。本研究的目的是简要回顾实验室中最广泛使用的评估化学品风险的方法,特别强调它们的局限性和优点。结果。在研究实验室中最常用于评估化学品风险的方法包括使用定性建模方法进行风险评估或使用定量暴露评估工具。结论。化学品风险评估算法是研究实验室中评估化学品风险的初步筛选目的的一种有用的解决方案:它们的易用性使它们易于获得,但另一方面不允许适当考虑所评估的暴露情景的特殊性。对于暴露估计模型,虽然这些工具具有广泛的适用性,但没有可靠和完整的验证来评估这种特殊类型暴露场景的准确性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Needle stick injuries among nurses in Italy: a review. High altitude underground mining. Acclimatization and possible toxicological risks. Nitrous oxide occupational exposure in conscious sedation procedures in endoscopic ambulatories: a pilot retrospective observational study in an Italian hospital. [Self-compassion and secondary traumatization: results of an observational study carried out in Covid hospital ordinary units]. Background Music in elderly nursing home: a feasibility explorative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1