Evaluation and optimization of reduction and alkylation methods to maximize peptide identification with MS-based proteomics†‡

IF 3.743 Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Molecular BioSystems Pub Date : 2017-09-20 DOI:10.1039/C7MB00393E
Suttipong Suttapitugsakul, Haopeng Xiao, Johanna Smeekens and Ronghu Wu
{"title":"Evaluation and optimization of reduction and alkylation methods to maximize peptide identification with MS-based proteomics†‡","authors":"Suttipong Suttapitugsakul, Haopeng Xiao, Johanna Smeekens and Ronghu Wu","doi":"10.1039/C7MB00393E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Mass spectrometry (MS) has become an increasingly important technique to analyze proteins. In popular bottom-up MS-based proteomics, reduction and alkylation are routine steps to facilitate peptide identification. However, incomplete reactions and side reactions may occur, which compromise the experimental results. In this work, we systematically evaluated the reduction step with commonly used reagents, <em>i.e.</em>, dithiothreitol, 2-mercaptoethanol, tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine, or tris(3-hydroxypropyl)phosphine, and alkylation with iodoacetamide, acrylamide, <em>N</em>-ethylmaleimide, or 4-vinylpyridine. By using digested peptides from a yeast whole-cell lysate, the number of proteins and peptides identified were very similar using four different reducing reagents. The results from four alkylating reagents, however, were dramatically different with iodoacetamide giving the highest number of peptides with alkylated cysteine and the lowest number of peptides with incomplete cysteine alkylation and side reactions. Alkylation conditions with iodoacetamide were further optimized. To identify more peptides with cysteine, thiopropyl-sepharose 6B resins were used to enrich them, and the optimal conditions were employed for the reduction and alkylation. The enrichment resulted in over three times more cysteine-containing peptides than without enrichment. Systematic evaluation of the reduction and alkylation with different reagents can aid in a better design of bottom-up proteomic experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":90,"journal":{"name":"Molecular BioSystems","volume":" 12","pages":" 2574-2582"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7430,"publicationDate":"2017-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/C7MB00393E","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular BioSystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2017/mb/c7mb00393e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS) has become an increasingly important technique to analyze proteins. In popular bottom-up MS-based proteomics, reduction and alkylation are routine steps to facilitate peptide identification. However, incomplete reactions and side reactions may occur, which compromise the experimental results. In this work, we systematically evaluated the reduction step with commonly used reagents, i.e., dithiothreitol, 2-mercaptoethanol, tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine, or tris(3-hydroxypropyl)phosphine, and alkylation with iodoacetamide, acrylamide, N-ethylmaleimide, or 4-vinylpyridine. By using digested peptides from a yeast whole-cell lysate, the number of proteins and peptides identified were very similar using four different reducing reagents. The results from four alkylating reagents, however, were dramatically different with iodoacetamide giving the highest number of peptides with alkylated cysteine and the lowest number of peptides with incomplete cysteine alkylation and side reactions. Alkylation conditions with iodoacetamide were further optimized. To identify more peptides with cysteine, thiopropyl-sepharose 6B resins were used to enrich them, and the optimal conditions were employed for the reduction and alkylation. The enrichment resulted in over three times more cysteine-containing peptides than without enrichment. Systematic evaluation of the reduction and alkylation with different reagents can aid in a better design of bottom-up proteomic experiments.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价和优化还原和烷基化方法,以最大限度地利用MS-based蛋白质组学鉴定多肽
质谱法(MS)已成为一种越来越重要的蛋白质分析技术。在流行的自下而上的基于ms的蛋白质组学中,还原和烷基化是促进肽鉴定的常规步骤。但可能出现不完全反应和副反应,影响实验结果。在这项工作中,我们系统地评估了使用常用试剂的还原步骤,即二硫代苏糖醇,2-巯基乙醇,三(2-羧乙基)膦或三(3-羟丙基)膦,并与碘乙酰胺,丙烯酰胺,n -乙基马来酰亚胺或4-乙烯基吡啶烷基化。通过使用酵母全细胞裂解物的消化肽,使用四种不同的还原试剂鉴定出的蛋白质和肽的数量非常相似。然而,四种烷基化试剂的结果却有显著差异,碘乙酰胺的半胱氨酸烷基化肽数最多,半胱氨酸不完全烷基化肽数最少。进一步优化了与碘乙酰胺的烷基化条件。为了鉴定更多含有半胱氨酸的多肽,采用硫丙基-sepharose 6B树脂进行富集,并采用最佳条件进行还原和烷基化。富集产生的含半胱氨酸肽比未富集的多三倍以上。系统评价不同试剂的还原和烷基化反应有助于更好地设计自下而上的蛋白质组学实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular BioSystems
Molecular BioSystems 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
2.94
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Omics publishes molecular level experimental and bioinformatics research in the -omics sciences, including genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics. We will also welcome multidisciplinary papers presenting studies combining different types of omics, or the interface of omics and other fields such as systems biology or chemical biology.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Oxaliplatin on Facial Sensitivity to Cool Temperatures and TRPM8 Expressing Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons in Mice. Correction: Dynamic properties of dipeptidyl peptidase III from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and the structural basis for its substrate specificity – a computational study Pharmacology of predatory and defensive venom peptides in cone snails Staphylococcus aureus extracellular vesicles (EVs): surface-binding antagonists of biofilm formation† Mechanism of the formation of the RecA–ssDNA nucleoprotein filament structure: a coarse-grained approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1