Serological Detection of Rh-Del Phenotype among Rh-Negative Blood Donors at National Blood Center, Yangon, Myanmar.

Q3 Medicine Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2020-02-18 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/3482124
Saw Thu Wah, Saung Nay Chi, Kyi Kyi Kyaing, Aye Aye Khin, Thida Aung
{"title":"Serological Detection of Rh-Del Phenotype among Rh-Negative Blood Donors at National Blood Center, Yangon, Myanmar.","authors":"Saw Thu Wah,&nbsp;Saung Nay Chi,&nbsp;Kyi Kyi Kyaing,&nbsp;Aye Aye Khin,&nbsp;Thida Aung","doi":"10.1155/2020/3482124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Red cell Rhesus (Rh) antigen expression is influenced by the genetic polymorphism of <i>RHD</i> and <i>RHCE</i> genes and reveals serologically different reactions of RhD variants such as partial D, weak D, and Rh-Del. Serologically, Rh-Del type can only be detected by an adsorption-elution technique, and it might be mistyped as Rh-negative. The prevalence of Rh-Del has not been reported yet in Myanmar.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 222 Rh-negative blood donors in the National Blood Center were tested for weak D and Rh-Del by indirect antihuman globulin and adsorption-elution method, respectively. RhCE typing was performed among Rh-negative and Rh-Del.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of them, 75.2% (167/222) were Rh-negative, 15.8% (35/222) were Rh-Del, and 9% (20/222) were weak D. Of 202 blood donors (167 true Rh-negative and 35 Rh-Del), all of the Rh-Del positives were C-antigen-positive with 94.3% Ccee phenotype (33/35) and 5.7% CCee (2/35). Most of the Rh-negative donors (80.2%) were ccee phenotype (134/167).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>About half of Rh-Del subjects were repeated donors, and attention was needed to avoid transfusion of truly Rh-negative patients to prevent alloimmunization. It is recommended to do Rh-Del typing of Rh-negative donors who are C-antigen-positive and consider moving them to the Rh-positive pool. Further study is needed to clarify the alloimmunization status for transfusion of Rh-Del blood to Rh-negative recipients. Molecular markers for RhD-negative and D variants should be established in the Myanmar population to improve selection of antisera for Rh typing and enhance safety of the transfusion services.</p>","PeriodicalId":7325,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Hematology","volume":"2020 ","pages":"3482124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/3482124","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3482124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Red cell Rhesus (Rh) antigen expression is influenced by the genetic polymorphism of RHD and RHCE genes and reveals serologically different reactions of RhD variants such as partial D, weak D, and Rh-Del. Serologically, Rh-Del type can only be detected by an adsorption-elution technique, and it might be mistyped as Rh-negative. The prevalence of Rh-Del has not been reported yet in Myanmar.

Method: A total of 222 Rh-negative blood donors in the National Blood Center were tested for weak D and Rh-Del by indirect antihuman globulin and adsorption-elution method, respectively. RhCE typing was performed among Rh-negative and Rh-Del.

Results: Of them, 75.2% (167/222) were Rh-negative, 15.8% (35/222) were Rh-Del, and 9% (20/222) were weak D. Of 202 blood donors (167 true Rh-negative and 35 Rh-Del), all of the Rh-Del positives were C-antigen-positive with 94.3% Ccee phenotype (33/35) and 5.7% CCee (2/35). Most of the Rh-negative donors (80.2%) were ccee phenotype (134/167).

Conclusion: About half of Rh-Del subjects were repeated donors, and attention was needed to avoid transfusion of truly Rh-negative patients to prevent alloimmunization. It is recommended to do Rh-Del typing of Rh-negative donors who are C-antigen-positive and consider moving them to the Rh-positive pool. Further study is needed to clarify the alloimmunization status for transfusion of Rh-Del blood to Rh-negative recipients. Molecular markers for RhD-negative and D variants should be established in the Myanmar population to improve selection of antisera for Rh typing and enhance safety of the transfusion services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缅甸仰光国家血液中心rh阴性献血者Rh-Del表型的血清学检测
背景:Rh抗原的表达受RHD和RHCE基因多态性的影响,并揭示了部分D、弱D和Rh- del等RHD变异在血清学上的不同反应。血清学上,Rh-Del型只能通过吸附-洗脱技术检测,可能被误认为rh阴性。缅甸尚未报告Rh-Del的流行情况。方法:对国家血液中心222例rh阴性献血者分别采用间接抗人球蛋白法和吸附洗脱法检测弱D和Rh-Del。对rh阴性和Rh-Del进行RhCE分型。结果:rh阴性者占75.2% (167/222),Rh-Del阳性者占15.8%(35/222),弱d阳性者占9%(20/222)。202名献血者(真rh阴性167人,Rh-Del阳性35人)Rh-Del阳性均为c抗原阳性,Ccee表型占94.3% (33/35),Ccee表型占5.7%(2/35)。rh阴性供者(80.2%)为ccee表型(134/167)。结论:Rh-Del患者中约有一半是重复供体,需要注意避免真正rh阴性患者输血,防止同种异体免疫。建议对c抗原阳性的rh阴性供者进行Rh-Del分型,并考虑将其转移到rh阳性供者池中。需要进一步的研究来阐明Rh-Del血输注给rh阴性受体的同种异体免疫状况。应在缅甸人群中建立Rh阴性和D变异的分子标记物,以改进Rh分型抗血清的选择,并加强输血服务的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Hematology
Advances in Hematology Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Variability in Notification of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Sickle Cell Trait Across the United States. Early Molecular Response to Imatinib First-Line Therapy and Predictive Factors of Poor Outcomes for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Côte d'Ivoire. Relationships Between Markers of Iron Status and Hematological Parameters in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease. A Comparative Analysis of Hydroxyurea Treatment on Coagulation Profile Among Sickle Cell Anaemia Children in Lagos, Nigeria. Advancements in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: From Signaling Pathways to Targeted Therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1