Comparing Nursing Student Competence in CPR before and after a Pedagogical Intervention.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING Nursing Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-02-21 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/7459084
Siv Roel, Ida Torunn Bjørk
{"title":"Comparing Nursing Student Competence in CPR before and after a Pedagogical Intervention.","authors":"Siv Roel, Ida Torunn Bjørk","doi":"10.1155/2020/7459084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nursing students must be able to initiate and perform effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) when they start their career in nursing. Studies show that students' competency in CPR is deficient, indicating that better training is necessary during nursing education. This study reports on the differences in nursing students' competence in CPR before and after a longitudinal pedagogical intervention across the curriculum. Changes in the curriculum were relocation and added testing of CPR skills, inclusion of a course in defibrillation, a knowledge test as stimuli before simulation, and more simulation practice with deteriorating patients. This was a comparative study between two cohorts of students in the bachelor in nursing education. We measured knowledge and compression performance in the students' final year of education. Students in cohort 2, who received the pedagogical intervention, had a significant higher total knowledge score than students in cohort 1. Students' mean depth and number of correct compressions was similar. Students in cohort 2 had a significantly higher mean rate of compressions, number of compressions per minute, and mean number of compressions with incorrect hand positions. Although the new curriculum afforded more hands-on practice of CPR, it was not enough to improve the students' performance to match the demands set out in national and international guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":46917,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research and Practice","volume":"2020 ","pages":"7459084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/7459084","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7459084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Nursing students must be able to initiate and perform effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) when they start their career in nursing. Studies show that students' competency in CPR is deficient, indicating that better training is necessary during nursing education. This study reports on the differences in nursing students' competence in CPR before and after a longitudinal pedagogical intervention across the curriculum. Changes in the curriculum were relocation and added testing of CPR skills, inclusion of a course in defibrillation, a knowledge test as stimuli before simulation, and more simulation practice with deteriorating patients. This was a comparative study between two cohorts of students in the bachelor in nursing education. We measured knowledge and compression performance in the students' final year of education. Students in cohort 2, who received the pedagogical intervention, had a significant higher total knowledge score than students in cohort 1. Students' mean depth and number of correct compressions was similar. Students in cohort 2 had a significantly higher mean rate of compressions, number of compressions per minute, and mean number of compressions with incorrect hand positions. Although the new curriculum afforded more hands-on practice of CPR, it was not enough to improve the students' performance to match the demands set out in national and international guidelines.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学干预前后护生心肺复苏术能力的比较。
护理专业的学生在开始他们的护理职业生涯时必须能够发起和执行有效的心肺复苏(CPR)。研究表明,学生的心肺复苏能力不足,表明护理教育需要更好的培训。本研究报告了护生在实施纵向教学干预前后的心肺复苏术能力差异。课程的变化包括重新安排和增加心肺复苏术技能测试,包括除颤课程,模拟前的知识测试作为刺激,以及对病情恶化的患者进行更多的模拟练习。本研究为两组护理教育学士学生的比较研究。我们在学生最后一年的教育中测量了知识和压缩性能。接受教学干预的队列2学生的总知识得分显著高于队列1学生。学生的平均按压深度和正确按压次数相似。队列2的学生平均按压率、每分钟按压次数和手部位置不正确的按压次数明显更高。虽然新课程提供了更多的心肺复苏术实践,但这还不足以提高学生的表现,以满足国内和国际指导方针的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nursing Faculty Shortage Impact on Nursing Students: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study. Nurses' Perception on the Hindrances of Triage System in Emergency Unit. Development of a Symptom Self-Management Guide for Older Chinese Americans Kidney Receiving Replacement Therapy. NoFumo+: Mobile Health App to Quit Smoking Using Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. Measuring Cardiovascular Disease Risk Perception: Translation and Validation of the Indonesian ABCD Risk Questionnaire.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1