Female patient preferences regarding physician gender: a national survey.

IF 1 Q2 Medicine Minerva ginecologica Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04502-5
Tiffanie Y Tam, Austin M Hill, Abigail Shatkin-Margolis, Rachel N Pauls
{"title":"Female patient preferences regarding physician gender: a national survey.","authors":"Tiffanie Y Tam,&nbsp;Austin M Hill,&nbsp;Abigail Shatkin-Margolis,&nbsp;Rachel N Pauls","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04502-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of male medical students selecting Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) has declined in recent years. However, it is unclear whether patients prioritize a female provider. The aim of the study was to assess gender preferences amongst female patients regarding their OBGYN and other medical providers. A secondary aim was to evaluate qualities that are important to female patients regarding their OBGYN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a USA cross-sectional survey using an internet-based provider (SurveyMonkey®) in January 2019. A 19-item questionnaire was distributed to females aged 18-80. The survey queried demographics, gender preferences for medical providers and important qualities in selecting their OBGYN. A goal of 1000 responses was determined for the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand and fifteen women completed the entire survey. Sixty-six percent of respondents (N.=667) preferred a female OBGYN, while 8% (N.=87) preferred male, 25% (N.=261) no preference. The majority (51%) voiced no gender preference regarding other providers (N.=521). When asked to rank the 3 most important qualities in selecting their OBGYN, experience (57%), knowledge (51%), reputation (35%) and personality (34%) were most frequently chosen amongst the top 3. Gender was listed among the 3 important qualities by only 8% (N.=88). Women who identified as single, <45 years of age, and nulliparous had a higher likelihood of preferring a female OBGYN (P<0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Majority of women reported a female preference when selecting an OBGYN. However, when compared to other qualities, it is deemed less important. Male medical students considering OBGYN should be reassured by this information.</p>","PeriodicalId":18745,"journal":{"name":"Minerva ginecologica","volume":"72 1","pages":"25-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva ginecologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04502-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: The number of male medical students selecting Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) has declined in recent years. However, it is unclear whether patients prioritize a female provider. The aim of the study was to assess gender preferences amongst female patients regarding their OBGYN and other medical providers. A secondary aim was to evaluate qualities that are important to female patients regarding their OBGYN.

Methods: This was a USA cross-sectional survey using an internet-based provider (SurveyMonkey®) in January 2019. A 19-item questionnaire was distributed to females aged 18-80. The survey queried demographics, gender preferences for medical providers and important qualities in selecting their OBGYN. A goal of 1000 responses was determined for the study.

Results: One thousand and fifteen women completed the entire survey. Sixty-six percent of respondents (N.=667) preferred a female OBGYN, while 8% (N.=87) preferred male, 25% (N.=261) no preference. The majority (51%) voiced no gender preference regarding other providers (N.=521). When asked to rank the 3 most important qualities in selecting their OBGYN, experience (57%), knowledge (51%), reputation (35%) and personality (34%) were most frequently chosen amongst the top 3. Gender was listed among the 3 important qualities by only 8% (N.=88). Women who identified as single, <45 years of age, and nulliparous had a higher likelihood of preferring a female OBGYN (P<0.003).

Conclusions: Majority of women reported a female preference when selecting an OBGYN. However, when compared to other qualities, it is deemed less important. Male medical students considering OBGYN should be reassured by this information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性患者对医生性别的偏好:一项全国性调查。
背景:近年来,男医学生选择妇产科(OBGYN)的人数有所下降。然而,尚不清楚患者是否优先考虑女性提供者。这项研究的目的是评估女性患者对妇产科医生和其他医疗服务提供者的性别偏好。第二个目的是评估女性患者在产科医生方面的重要品质。方法:这是2019年1月在美国使用基于互联网的提供商(SurveyMonkey®)进行的横断面调查。对年龄在18-80岁的女性进行问卷调查。该调查询问了人口统计、对医疗服务提供者的性别偏好以及选择妇产科医生时的重要品质。该研究的目标是获得1000份回复。结果:1500名女性完成了整个调查。66%的受访者(n =667)更喜欢女妇产科医生,8% (n =87)更喜欢男妇产科医生,25% (n =261)没有偏好。大多数(51%)表示对其他提供者没有性别偏好(n =521)。当被问及选择妇产科医生时最重要的三个品质时,经验(57%)、知识(51%)、声誉(35%)和个性(34%)是最常被选为前三名的。只有8%的人(88人)将性别列为3个重要品质之一。结论:大多数女性在选择妇产科医生时都有女性偏好。然而,与其他品质相比,它就显得不那么重要了。考虑选择妇产科的男医学生应该对这一信息感到放心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva ginecologica
Minerva ginecologica OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Ginecologica publishes scientific papers on obstetrics and gynecology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Minilaparoscopy in gynecology: applications, benefits and limitations. Re-birth in a Covid hospital: a point of view. Endometriosis-associated infertility: surgery or IVF? Cesarean delivery: an evidence-based review on of the technique. Approaching ovarian endometrioma with medical therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1