The development of antipsychotic drugs.

Brain and neuroscience advances Pub Date : 2018-12-05 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2398212818817498
David Cunningham Owens, Eve C Johnstone
{"title":"The development of antipsychotic drugs.","authors":"David Cunningham Owens, Eve C Johnstone","doi":"10.1177/2398212818817498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antipsychotic drugs revolutionised psychiatric practice and provided a range of tools for exploring brain function in health and disease. Their development and introduction were largely empirical but based on long and honourable scientific credentials and remarkable powers of clinical observation. The class shares a common core action of attenuating central dopamine transmission, which underlies the major limitation to their use - high liability to disrupt extrapyramidal function - and also the most durable hypothesis of the basis of psychotic disorders, especially schizophrenia. However, the Dopamine Hypothesis, which has driven drug development for almost half a century, has become a straight-jacket, stifling innovation, resulting in a class of compounds that are largely derivative. Recent efforts only cemented this tendency as no clinical evidence supports the notion that newer compounds, modelled on clozapine, share that drug's unique neurological tolerability and can be considered 'atypical'. Patients and doctors alike must await a more profound understanding of central dopamine homeostasis and novel methods of maintaining it before they can again experience the intoxicating promise antipsychotics once held.</p>","PeriodicalId":72444,"journal":{"name":"Brain and neuroscience advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/6d/10.1177_2398212818817498.PMC7058266.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and neuroscience advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2398212818817498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antipsychotic drugs revolutionised psychiatric practice and provided a range of tools for exploring brain function in health and disease. Their development and introduction were largely empirical but based on long and honourable scientific credentials and remarkable powers of clinical observation. The class shares a common core action of attenuating central dopamine transmission, which underlies the major limitation to their use - high liability to disrupt extrapyramidal function - and also the most durable hypothesis of the basis of psychotic disorders, especially schizophrenia. However, the Dopamine Hypothesis, which has driven drug development for almost half a century, has become a straight-jacket, stifling innovation, resulting in a class of compounds that are largely derivative. Recent efforts only cemented this tendency as no clinical evidence supports the notion that newer compounds, modelled on clozapine, share that drug's unique neurological tolerability and can be considered 'atypical'. Patients and doctors alike must await a more profound understanding of central dopamine homeostasis and novel methods of maintaining it before they can again experience the intoxicating promise antipsychotics once held.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗精神病药物的开发。
抗精神病药物彻底改变了精神病治疗方法,并为探索健康和疾病中的大脑功能提供了一系列工具。抗精神病药物的开发和引入主要是经验性的,但其基础却是长期而光荣的科学资历和非凡的临床观察能力。这类药物有一个共同的核心作用,即减弱中枢多巴胺的传递,这也是其使用的主要局限性--极易破坏锥体外系功能--的基础,同时也是关于精神障碍,尤其是精神分裂症基础的最持久的假说。然而,多巴胺假说推动了近半个世纪的药物研发,却成为一种束缚,扼杀了创新,导致这类化合物在很大程度上是衍生产品。最近的努力只是巩固了这一趋势,因为没有临床证据支持这样一种观点,即以氯氮平为蓝本的新化合物具有氯氮平独特的神经耐受性,可以被视为 "非典型 "药物。患者和医生都必须等待对中枢多巴胺稳态和维持多巴胺稳态的新方法有更深刻的理解后,才能再次体验到抗精神病药物曾经带来的令人陶醉的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Not all plaques are created equal: Uncovering a unique molecular signature in Alzheimer's disease. Children aged 5-13 years show adult-like disgust avoidance, but not proto-nausea. Brain mechanisms of temporal processing in impulsivity: Relevance to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Does theta synchronicity of sensory information enhance associative memory? Replicating the theta-induced memory effect. A multimodal approach connecting cortical and behavioural responses to the visual continuity illusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1