Using diffusion of innovations framework to examine the dissemination and implementation of the adult protective services national voluntary consensus guidelines.

IF 1.6 2区 心理学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2020-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-03-18 DOI:10.1080/08946566.2020.1742836
Julie Bobitt, Julie Carter, Jamie Kuhne
{"title":"Using diffusion of innovations framework to examine the dissemination and implementation of the adult protective services national voluntary consensus guidelines.","authors":"Julie Bobitt,&nbsp;Julie Carter,&nbsp;Jamie Kuhne","doi":"10.1080/08946566.2020.1742836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Voluntary Consensus Guidelines for Adult Protective Services (APS) were released in 2016 by the Administration for Community Living. These Guidelines help standardize systems to ensure the protection of older adults and adults with disabilities against abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation. Since their release, the extent to which state APS programs are aware of and using the Guidelines is unknown. This study examined the dissemination and implementation of the Guidelines across APS programs in the US. Researchers used the Diffusion of Innovations Theory to develop a survey sent to APS directors in all states. Forty-two states responded, and results were used to select a subset of states in which to conduct in-depth interviews. Awareness of the Guidelines was widespread but varied. Reported use of the Guidelines indicates that states are working to incorporate them into their practices. Respondents identified the need for more research and training in evidence-based practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":46983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","volume":"32 3","pages":"201-216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08946566.2020.1742836","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2020.1742836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The National Voluntary Consensus Guidelines for Adult Protective Services (APS) were released in 2016 by the Administration for Community Living. These Guidelines help standardize systems to ensure the protection of older adults and adults with disabilities against abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation. Since their release, the extent to which state APS programs are aware of and using the Guidelines is unknown. This study examined the dissemination and implementation of the Guidelines across APS programs in the US. Researchers used the Diffusion of Innovations Theory to develop a survey sent to APS directors in all states. Forty-two states responded, and results were used to select a subset of states in which to conduct in-depth interviews. Awareness of the Guidelines was widespread but varied. Reported use of the Guidelines indicates that states are working to incorporate them into their practices. Respondents identified the need for more research and training in evidence-based practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用创新扩散框架审查成人保护服务国家自愿协商一致准则的传播和执行情况。
《成人保护服务国家自愿共识指南》(APS)于2016年由社区生活管理局发布。这些准则有助于使系统标准化,以确保保护老年人和残疾成年人免受虐待、忽视和经济剥削。自发布以来,各州APS计划了解和使用指南的程度是未知的。本研究考察了指南在美国APS项目中的传播和实施情况。研究人员利用创新扩散理论编制了一份调查,发给了美国所有州的APS董事。42个州做出了回应,结果被用来选择一部分州进行深入采访。对《准则》的认识很广泛,但各不相同。报告使用《准则》的情况表明,各国正在努力将其纳入其实践。答复者认为需要在循证实践方面进行更多的研究和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect is the peer-reviewed quarterly journal that explores the advances in research, policy and practice, and clinical and ethical issues surrounding the abuse and neglect of older people. This unique forum provides state-of-the-art research and practice that is both international and multidisciplinary in scope. The journal"s broad, comprehensive approach is only one of its strengths—it presents training issues, research findings, case studies, practice and policy issues, book and media reviews, commentary, and historical background on a wide range of topics. Readers get tools and techniques needed for better detecting and responding to actual or potential elder abuse and neglect.
期刊最新文献
No, thank you: reasons for withdrawal from older adult abuse support services. Elder abuse in Flanders, Belgium: perspectives from home care nurses. Older adults who use drugs: an examination of policy and preparedness in nursing facilities. Transforming learning for adult protective services caseworker certification training: program evaluation of simulation training. Elder mistreatment and psychological resilience: the moderating role of social support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1