The likelihood of requiring a diagnostic test: Classifying emergency department patients with logistic regression.

Görkem Sarıyer, Mustafa Gökalp Ataman
{"title":"The likelihood of requiring a diagnostic test: Classifying emergency department patients with logistic regression.","authors":"Görkem Sarıyer,&nbsp;Mustafa Gökalp Ataman","doi":"10.1177/1833358320908975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency departments (EDs) play an important role in health systems since they are the front line for patients with emergency medical conditions who frequently require diagnostic tests and timely treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To improve decision-making and accelerate processes in EDs, this study proposes predictive models for classifying patients according to whether or not they are likely to require a diagnostic test based on referral diagnosis, age, gender, triage category and type of arrival.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective data were categorised into four output patient groups: not requiring any diagnostic test (group A); requiring a radiology test (group B); requiring a laboratory test (group C); requiring both tests (group D). Multivariable logistic regression models were used, with the outcome classifications represented as a series of binary variables: test (1) or no test (0); in the case of group A, no test (1) or test (0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all models, age, triage category, type of arrival and referral diagnosis were significant predictors whereas gender was not. The main referral diagnosis with high model coefficients varied by designed output groups (groups A, B, C and D). The overall accuracies of the logistic regression models for groups A, B, C and D were, respectively, 74.11%, 73.07%, 82.47% and 85.79%. Specificity metrics were higher than the sensitivities for groups B, C and D, meaning that these models were better able to predict negative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>These results provide guidance for ED triage staff, researchers and practitioners in making rapid decisions regarding patients' diagnostic test requirements based on specified variables in the predictive models. This is critical in ED operations planning as it potentially decreases waiting times, while increasing patient satisfaction and operational performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1833358320908975","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358320908975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Emergency departments (EDs) play an important role in health systems since they are the front line for patients with emergency medical conditions who frequently require diagnostic tests and timely treatment.

Objective: To improve decision-making and accelerate processes in EDs, this study proposes predictive models for classifying patients according to whether or not they are likely to require a diagnostic test based on referral diagnosis, age, gender, triage category and type of arrival.

Method: Retrospective data were categorised into four output patient groups: not requiring any diagnostic test (group A); requiring a radiology test (group B); requiring a laboratory test (group C); requiring both tests (group D). Multivariable logistic regression models were used, with the outcome classifications represented as a series of binary variables: test (1) or no test (0); in the case of group A, no test (1) or test (0).

Results: For all models, age, triage category, type of arrival and referral diagnosis were significant predictors whereas gender was not. The main referral diagnosis with high model coefficients varied by designed output groups (groups A, B, C and D). The overall accuracies of the logistic regression models for groups A, B, C and D were, respectively, 74.11%, 73.07%, 82.47% and 85.79%. Specificity metrics were higher than the sensitivities for groups B, C and D, meaning that these models were better able to predict negative outcomes.

Implications: These results provide guidance for ED triage staff, researchers and practitioners in making rapid decisions regarding patients' diagnostic test requirements based on specified variables in the predictive models. This is critical in ED operations planning as it potentially decreases waiting times, while increasing patient satisfaction and operational performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需要诊断测试的可能性:用逻辑回归对急诊科患者进行分类。
背景:急诊科(EDs)在卫生系统中发挥着重要作用,因为它们是经常需要诊断测试和及时治疗的紧急医疗状况患者的前线。目的:为了改善急诊科的决策,加快急诊科的流程,本研究提出了基于转诊诊断、年龄、性别、分诊类别和到达类型,根据患者是否可能需要诊断测试来对患者进行分类的预测模型。方法:回顾性资料分为四组输出患者:不需要任何诊断测试(A组);需要进行放射学检查(B组);需要进行化验(C组);需要两种检验(D组)。采用多变量logistic回归模型,结果分类表示为一系列二元变量:检验(1)或不检验(0);在A组的情况下,没有测试(1)或测试(0)。结果:对于所有模型,年龄,分诊类别,到达类型和转诊诊断是显著的预测因素,而性别不是。不同设计输出组(A、B、C、D组)的主要转诊诊断模型系数较高,A、B、C、D组logistic回归模型的总体准确率分别为74.11%、73.07%、82.47%、85.79%。特异性指标高于B、C和D组的敏感性,这意味着这些模型能够更好地预测阴性结果。意义:这些结果为急诊科分诊人员、研究人员和从业人员根据预测模型中的特定变量对患者的诊断测试要求做出快速决策提供了指导。这在急诊科手术计划中至关重要,因为它有可能减少等待时间,同时提高患者满意度和手术绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medical and nursing clinician perspectives on the usability of the hospital electronic medical record: A qualitative analysis. The importance of SNOMED CT concept specificity in healthcare analytics. Patient online access to general practice medical records: A qualitative study on patients' needs and expectations. For-profit versus non-profit cybersecurity posture: breach types and locations in healthcare organisations. Impact of clinical note format on diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1