Resource evaluation framework for total knee arthroplasty.

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI:10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2019-0081
Laura Ikuma, Isabelina Nahmens, Amani Ahmad, Yasaswi Gudipudi, Vinod Dasa
{"title":"Resource evaluation framework for total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Laura Ikuma,&nbsp;Isabelina Nahmens,&nbsp;Amani Ahmad,&nbsp;Yasaswi Gudipudi,&nbsp;Vinod Dasa","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2019-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article describes a framework for evaluating efficiency of OR procedures incorporating time measurement, personnel activity, and resource utilization using traditional industrial engineering tools of time study and work sampling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The framework measures time using time studies of OR procedures and work sampling of personnel activities, ultimately classified as value-added or non-value-added. Statistical methods ensure that the collected samples meet adequate levels of confidence and accuracy. Resource utilization is captured through documentation of instrument trays used, defects in instruments, and trash weight and classification at the conclusion of surgeries.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A case study comprising 12 observations of total knee arthroplasty surgeries illustrates the use of the framework. The framework allows researchers to compare time, personnel, and resource utilization simultaneously within the OR setting.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>The framework provides a holistic evaluation of methods, instrumentation and resources, and staffing levels and allows researchers to identify areas for efficiency improvement.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The methods presented in this article are rooted in traditional industrial engineering work measurement methods but are applied to a healthcare setting in order to efficiently identify areas for improvement including time, personnel, and processes in operating rooms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47455,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2019-0081","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2019-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: This article describes a framework for evaluating efficiency of OR procedures incorporating time measurement, personnel activity, and resource utilization using traditional industrial engineering tools of time study and work sampling.

Methods: The framework measures time using time studies of OR procedures and work sampling of personnel activities, ultimately classified as value-added or non-value-added. Statistical methods ensure that the collected samples meet adequate levels of confidence and accuracy. Resource utilization is captured through documentation of instrument trays used, defects in instruments, and trash weight and classification at the conclusion of surgeries.

Findings: A case study comprising 12 observations of total knee arthroplasty surgeries illustrates the use of the framework. The framework allows researchers to compare time, personnel, and resource utilization simultaneously within the OR setting.

Practical implications: The framework provides a holistic evaluation of methods, instrumentation and resources, and staffing levels and allows researchers to identify areas for efficiency improvement.

Originality/value: The methods presented in this article are rooted in traditional industrial engineering work measurement methods but are applied to a healthcare setting in order to efficiently identify areas for improvement including time, personnel, and processes in operating rooms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术资源评价框架。
目的:本文描述了一个框架,用于评估OR程序的效率,包括时间测量、人员活动和资源利用,使用传统的工业工程工具进行时间研究和工作抽样。方法:该框架使用手术室程序的时间研究和人员活动的工作抽样来测量时间,最终分类为增值或非增值。统计方法确保所收集的样本达到足够的置信度和准确性。通过记录所使用的器械托盘、器械缺陷以及手术结束时的垃圾重量和分类,来捕获资源利用情况。研究结果:一项包括12例全膝关节置换术观察的病例研究说明了该框架的使用。该框架允许研究人员在手术室设置中同时比较时间、人员和资源利用情况。实际意义:该框架提供了对方法、仪器和资源以及人员水平的全面评估,并允许研究人员确定效率改进的领域。原创性/价值:本文中介绍的方法植根于传统的工业工程工作测量方法,但应用于医疗保健环境,以便有效地确定需要改进的领域,包括手术室的时间、人员和流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: ■Successful quality/continuous improvement projects ■The use of quality tools and models in leadership management development such as the EFQM Excellence Model, Balanced Scorecard, Quality Standards, Managed Care ■Issues relating to process control such as Six Sigma, Leadership, Managing Change and Process Mapping ■Improving patient care through quality related programmes and/or research Articles that use quantitative and qualitative methods are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
A cross-organizational Lean deployment in an Italian regional healthcare system. The mediating effect of patient trust on the relationship between service quality and patient satisfaction. Evaluating patient and medical staff satisfaction from doctor-patient communication. Lean six sigma and stroke in rural hospital - The case of Baruch Padeh Medical Center. Examining the behavioural intention of inpatients in Indian government hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1