Advantages of Outpatient Treatment with Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides for Serious Gram-Positive Infections: A Review.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2020-05-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-23 DOI:10.1002/phar.2389
Martin Krsak, Taylor Morrisette, Matthew Miller, Kyle Molina, Misha Huang, Laura Damioli, Larissa Pisney, Megan Wong, Eric Poeschla
{"title":"Advantages of Outpatient Treatment with Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides for Serious Gram-Positive Infections: A Review.","authors":"Martin Krsak,&nbsp;Taylor Morrisette,&nbsp;Matthew Miller,&nbsp;Kyle Molina,&nbsp;Misha Huang,&nbsp;Laura Damioli,&nbsp;Larissa Pisney,&nbsp;Megan Wong,&nbsp;Eric Poeschla","doi":"10.1002/phar.2389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment of serious gram-positive infections presents multiple challenges. Treatment often results in prolonged hospitalization for administration of intravenous antimicrobials and presents an inefficient use of hospital resources. Prolonged hospitalization is typically also unfavorable to patient preferences and potentially subjects patients to additional health care-associated complications. Current strategies of transition to outpatient settings-outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy and use of oral antibiotics-often do not adequately serve vulnerable populations for whom there is often no alternative to inpatient therapy. Specifically, people who use drugs, those who cannot reliably adhere to unsupervised treatment (poor mental or physical health), people with complicating life circumstances (e.g., homelessness, incarceration, rural location), and those with inadequate health insurance remain hospitalized for weeks longer than persons without such conditions. We suspected that long-acting lipoglycopeptides (laLGP), such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, may be useful in patient transitions to outpatient settings. Thus, we conducted a search of the peer-reviewed literature using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases. Based on accumulating literature, it appears that laLGPs offer a reliable alternative therapeutic strategy that addresses many of the personal and systemic barriers to the traditional transitioning approaches. Current evidence also suggests that these agents may be cost-effective from patient, payer, and hospital perspectives. Barriers to broader use of laLGPs include, among others, a relative lack of prospective data regarding efficacy in serious infections, a narrow United States Food and Drug Administration-approved indication restricted to only acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and lack of reimbursement infrastructure for inpatient settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":"40 5","pages":"469-478"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/phar.2389","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Treatment of serious gram-positive infections presents multiple challenges. Treatment often results in prolonged hospitalization for administration of intravenous antimicrobials and presents an inefficient use of hospital resources. Prolonged hospitalization is typically also unfavorable to patient preferences and potentially subjects patients to additional health care-associated complications. Current strategies of transition to outpatient settings-outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy and use of oral antibiotics-often do not adequately serve vulnerable populations for whom there is often no alternative to inpatient therapy. Specifically, people who use drugs, those who cannot reliably adhere to unsupervised treatment (poor mental or physical health), people with complicating life circumstances (e.g., homelessness, incarceration, rural location), and those with inadequate health insurance remain hospitalized for weeks longer than persons without such conditions. We suspected that long-acting lipoglycopeptides (laLGP), such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, may be useful in patient transitions to outpatient settings. Thus, we conducted a search of the peer-reviewed literature using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases. Based on accumulating literature, it appears that laLGPs offer a reliable alternative therapeutic strategy that addresses many of the personal and systemic barriers to the traditional transitioning approaches. Current evidence also suggests that these agents may be cost-effective from patient, payer, and hospital perspectives. Barriers to broader use of laLGPs include, among others, a relative lack of prospective data regarding efficacy in serious infections, a narrow United States Food and Drug Administration-approved indication restricted to only acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and lack of reimbursement infrastructure for inpatient settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊使用长效脂糖肽治疗严重革兰氏阳性感染的优势:综述
治疗严重革兰氏阳性感染面临多重挑战。治疗往往导致住院时间延长,需要静脉注射抗菌素,并造成医院资源的低效利用。长期住院治疗通常也不利于患者的偏好,并可能使患者遭受额外的卫生保健相关并发症。目前向门诊过渡的策略——门诊肠外抗菌药物治疗和使用口服抗生素——往往不能充分服务于弱势群体,因为他们往往没有住院治疗的其他选择。具体而言,吸毒者、不能可靠地坚持无监督治疗的人(精神或身体健康状况不佳)、生活环境复杂的人(例如,无家可归、被监禁、住在农村)和没有充分医疗保险的人住院的时间比没有这种情况的人长几周。我们怀疑长效脂糖肽(laLGP),如达尔巴万辛和奥利塔万辛,可能在患者转到门诊时有用。因此,我们使用PubMed、Google Scholar和MEDLINE数据库对同行评议文献进行了搜索。根据积累的文献,lalgp似乎提供了一种可靠的替代治疗策略,解决了传统过渡方法的许多个人和系统障碍。目前的证据还表明,从患者、付款人和医院的角度来看,这些药物可能具有成本效益。广泛使用lalgp的障碍包括,相对缺乏关于严重感染疗效的前瞻性数据,美国食品和药物管理局批准的适应症狭窄,仅限于急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染,以及缺乏住院治疗的报销基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Exposure During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Cohort Study to Determine the Impact of CYP3A5 Genotype on Tacrolimus Dosing Requirements and Trough Concentrations in Heart Transplant Recipients. Considerations for Menstrual Suppression in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies. Development and Validation of a Time-Dependent Nomogram for Predicting Hematological Toxicity Risk During Linezolid Therapy in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Oral β-Lactams for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Point-Counterpoint Comparison With Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole and Fluoroquinolones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1