Occupational noise and age: A longitudinal study of hearing sensitivity as a function of noise exposure and age in South African gold mine workers.

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS Pub Date : 2020-03-17 DOI:10.4102/sajcd.v67i2.687
Leoni M Grobler, De Wet Swanepoel, Susan Strauss, Piet Becker, Zahan Eloff
{"title":"Occupational noise and age: A longitudinal study of hearing sensitivity as a function of noise exposure and age in South African gold mine workers.","authors":"Leoni M Grobler, De Wet Swanepoel, Susan Strauss, Piet Becker, Zahan Eloff","doi":"10.4102/sajcd.v67i2.687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A relationship exists between occupational noise exposure and age, which remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between hearing loss and age over time.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Audiological data from 2583 mine workers in South Africa were utilised. Data were received from a non-noise exposed group (NNEG) (n = 951) and a noise exposed group (NEG) (≥85 dBA) (n = 1632). Data comprised a low-frequency average (LFA512) (average of audiological thresholds for 0.5 kHz, 1 kHz and 2 kHz) and high-frequency average (HFA346) (average of audiological thresholds for 3 kHz, 4 kHz and 6 kHz). Data were compared by using mixed-effects regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Base threshold values were higher for the NEG than for the NNEG across frequencies. All year-to-year increases in mean hearing thresholds were statistically significant (p 0.01). When correcting for age, increases in mean hearing thresholds were higher for the NEG than for the NNEG for HFA346 (3.5 dB vs. 2.9 dB decline over a 4-year period) but similar for LFA512 (0.6 dB vs. 0.7 dB decline). Uncorrected for age, increases in mean hearing thresholds were higher than when age was corrected for.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age and occupational noise exposure influence hearing thresholds over time. The continued increase in hearing thresholds of the NEG above that of the NNEG can be related to ineffective noise management programmes and/or the fact that early noise exposure leads to a higher burden of hearing loss over time - even after noise exposure had stopped.</p>","PeriodicalId":44003,"journal":{"name":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","volume":"67 2","pages":"e1-e7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v67i2.687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A relationship exists between occupational noise exposure and age, which remains poorly understood.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between hearing loss and age over time.

Method: Audiological data from 2583 mine workers in South Africa were utilised. Data were received from a non-noise exposed group (NNEG) (n = 951) and a noise exposed group (NEG) (≥85 dBA) (n = 1632). Data comprised a low-frequency average (LFA512) (average of audiological thresholds for 0.5 kHz, 1 kHz and 2 kHz) and high-frequency average (HFA346) (average of audiological thresholds for 3 kHz, 4 kHz and 6 kHz). Data were compared by using mixed-effects regression analysis.

Results: Base threshold values were higher for the NEG than for the NNEG across frequencies. All year-to-year increases in mean hearing thresholds were statistically significant (p 0.01). When correcting for age, increases in mean hearing thresholds were higher for the NEG than for the NNEG for HFA346 (3.5 dB vs. 2.9 dB decline over a 4-year period) but similar for LFA512 (0.6 dB vs. 0.7 dB decline). Uncorrected for age, increases in mean hearing thresholds were higher than when age was corrected for.

Conclusion: Age and occupational noise exposure influence hearing thresholds over time. The continued increase in hearing thresholds of the NEG above that of the NNEG can be related to ineffective noise management programmes and/or the fact that early noise exposure leads to a higher burden of hearing loss over time - even after noise exposure had stopped.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业噪声与年龄:南非金矿工人听力灵敏度与噪声暴露和年龄关系的纵向研究。
背景:职业噪声暴露与年龄之间存在关系,但人们对这一关系的了解仍然很少:本研究旨在确定听力损失与年龄之间的关系:方法:利用南非 2583 名矿工的听力数据。数据来自非噪声暴露组(NNEG)(n = 951)和噪声暴露组(NEG)(≥85 dBA)(n = 1632)。数据包括低频平均值(LFA512)(0.5 kHz、1 kHz 和 2 kHz 的听阈平均值)和高频平均值(HFA346)(3 kHz、4 kHz 和 6 kHz 的听阈平均值)。通过混合效应回归分析对数据进行比较:在不同频率下,NEG 的基本阈值均高于 NNEG。平均听力阈值的逐年增长均具有统计学意义(P 0.01)。如果对年龄进行校正,对于 HFA346,NEG 的平均听阈增幅高于 NNEG(4 年间分别下降了 3.5 分贝和 2.9 分贝),但对于 LFA512,两者的增幅相似(分别下降了 0.6 分贝和 0.7 分贝)。在未校正年龄的情况下,平均听阈的增长高于校正年龄后的增长:结论:年龄和职业噪声暴露会随着时间的推移影响听阈。NEG听阈持续高于NNEG听阈,这可能与噪声管理计划无效和/或早期噪声暴露导致听力损失负担加重有关,即使在噪声暴露停止后也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
36.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Community-based infant hearing screening: Outcomes of a rural pilot programme. Communication Intervention in South Africa: Advocating for the Listening and Spoken Language Approach. Brainstem auditory evoked responses: Objective hearing threshold assessment in Holstein cows. The outcomes of an audiological management programme for neonates with hyperbilirubinaemia. Awareness of middle ear pathologies in South Africa: Towards a primordial preventive audiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1