When can Muslims withdraw or withhold life support? A narrative review of Islamic juridical rulings.

Q1 Arts and Humanities Global Bioethics Pub Date : 2020-03-22 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/11287462.2020.1736243
Afshan Mohiuddin, Mehrunisha Suleman, Shoaib Rasheed, Aasim I Padela
{"title":"When can Muslims withdraw or withhold life support? A narrative review of Islamic juridical rulings.","authors":"Afshan Mohiuddin, Mehrunisha Suleman, Shoaib Rasheed, Aasim I Padela","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2020.1736243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When it is ethically justifiable to stop medical treatment? For many Muslim patients, families, and clinicians this ethical question remains a challenging one as Islamic ethico-legal guidance on such matters remains scattered and difficult to interpret. In light of this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to aggregate rulings from Islamic jurists and juridical councils on whether, and when, it is permitted to withdraw and/or withhold life-sustaining care. A total of 16 <i>fatwās</i> were found, 8 of which were single-author rulings, and 8 represented the collective view of a juridical council. The <i>fatwās</i> are similar in that nearly all judge that Islamic law, provided certain conditions are met, permits abstaining from life-sustaining treatment. Notably, the justifying conditions appear to rely on physician assessment of the clinical prognosis. The <i>fatwās</i> differ when it comes to what conditions justify withdrawing or withholding life- sustaining care. Our analyses suggest that while notions of futility greatly impact the bioethical discourse regarding with holding and/or withdrawal of treatment, the conceptualization of futility lacks nuance. Therefore, clinicians, Islamic jurists, and bioethicists need to come together in order to unify a conception of medical futility and relate it to the ethics of withholding and/or withdrawal of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2020.1736243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When it is ethically justifiable to stop medical treatment? For many Muslim patients, families, and clinicians this ethical question remains a challenging one as Islamic ethico-legal guidance on such matters remains scattered and difficult to interpret. In light of this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to aggregate rulings from Islamic jurists and juridical councils on whether, and when, it is permitted to withdraw and/or withhold life-sustaining care. A total of 16 fatwās were found, 8 of which were single-author rulings, and 8 represented the collective view of a juridical council. The fatwās are similar in that nearly all judge that Islamic law, provided certain conditions are met, permits abstaining from life-sustaining treatment. Notably, the justifying conditions appear to rely on physician assessment of the clinical prognosis. The fatwās differ when it comes to what conditions justify withdrawing or withholding life- sustaining care. Our analyses suggest that while notions of futility greatly impact the bioethical discourse regarding with holding and/or withdrawal of treatment, the conceptualization of futility lacks nuance. Therefore, clinicians, Islamic jurists, and bioethicists need to come together in order to unify a conception of medical futility and relate it to the ethics of withholding and/or withdrawal of treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
穆斯林何时可以撤销或停止生命支持?伊斯兰司法裁决的叙述性回顾。
何时停止治疗在伦理上是合理的?对于许多穆斯林患者、家属和临床医生来说,这个伦理问题仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题,因为伊斯兰教在此类问题上的伦理-法律指导仍然分散且难以解释。有鉴于此,我们进行了一次系统的文献综述,以汇总伊斯兰法学家和司法委员会关于是否允许以及何时允许撤销和/或暂停维持生命的治疗的裁决。共找到 16 篇法特瓦(fatwās),其中 8 篇为单一作者的裁决,8 篇代表了一个司法委员会的集体观点。这些法特瓦的内容大同小异,几乎所有的法特瓦都认为,只要满足某些条件,伊斯兰法允许放弃维持生命的治疗。值得注意的是,这些条件似乎都依赖于医生对临床预后的评估。法特瓦在哪些条件下可以撤销或停止维持生命的治疗方面存在分歧。我们的分析表明,虽然 "无效 "的概念在很大程度上影响了有关保留和/或撤销治疗的生命伦理讨论,但 "无效 "的概念缺乏细微差别。因此,临床医生、伊斯兰法学家和生命伦理学者需要走到一起,以统一医疗无效的概念,并将其与暂停和/或撤销治疗的伦理学联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
Can biosampling really be "non-invasive"? An examination of the socially invasive nature of physically non-invasive biosampling in urban and rural Malawi. The expressivist argument for recent policy changes regarding the provision of prenatal testing in Japan. A youth advisory group on health and health research in rural Cambodia. May Artificial Intelligence take health and sustainability on a honeymoon? Towards green technologies for multidimensional health and environmental justice. Broad consent for biobank research in South Africa - Towards an enabling ethico-legal framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1