Return of Research-Related Genetic Test Results and Genetic Discrimination Concerns: Facilitators and Barriers of Genetic Research Participation in Diverse Groups.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Public Health Genomics Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-14 DOI:10.1159/000507056
Andrea N Burnett-Hartman, Erica Blum-Barnett, Nikki M Carroll, Sarah D Madrid, Cabell Jonas, Kristen Janes, Monica Alvarado, Ruth Bedoy, Valerie Paolino, Nazneen Aziz, Elizabeth A McGlynn
{"title":"Return of Research-Related Genetic Test Results and Genetic Discrimination Concerns: Facilitators and Barriers of Genetic Research Participation in Diverse Groups.","authors":"Andrea N Burnett-Hartman,&nbsp;Erica Blum-Barnett,&nbsp;Nikki M Carroll,&nbsp;Sarah D Madrid,&nbsp;Cabell Jonas,&nbsp;Kristen Janes,&nbsp;Monica Alvarado,&nbsp;Ruth Bedoy,&nbsp;Valerie Paolino,&nbsp;Nazneen Aziz,&nbsp;Elizabeth A McGlynn","doi":"10.1159/000507056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most genetics studies lack the diversity necessary to ensure that all groups benefit from genetic research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore facilitators and barriers to genetic research participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a survey on genetics in research and healthcare from November 15, 2017 to February 28, 2018 among adult Kaiser Permanente (KP) members who had been invited to participate in the KP biobank (KP Research Bank). We used logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the willingness to participate in genetic research under different return of results scenarios and genetic discrimination concerns between groups, according to their demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57,331 KP members were invited to participate, and 10,369 completed the survey (18% response rate). Respondents were 65% female, 44% non-Hispanic White (NH White), 22% Asian/Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (Asian/PI), 19% non-Hispanic Black (NH Black), and 16% Hispanic. Respondents willing to participate in genetic research ranged from 22% with no results returned to 87% if health-related genetic results were returned. We also found variation by race/ethnicity; when no results were to be returned, Asian/PIs, Hispanics, and NH Blacks were less likely to want to participate than NH Whites (p < 0.05). However, when results were returned, disparities in the willingness to participate disappeared for NH Blacks and Hispanics. Genetic discrimination concerns were more prevalent in Asian/PIs, Hispanics, and NH Blacks than in NH Whites (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policies that prohibit the return of results and do not address genetic discrimination concerns may contribute to a greater underrepresentation of diverse groups in genetic research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":"23 1-2","pages":"59-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000507056","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000507056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: Most genetics studies lack the diversity necessary to ensure that all groups benefit from genetic research.

Objectives: To explore facilitators and barriers to genetic research participation.

Methods: We conducted a survey on genetics in research and healthcare from November 15, 2017 to February 28, 2018 among adult Kaiser Permanente (KP) members who had been invited to participate in the KP biobank (KP Research Bank). We used logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the willingness to participate in genetic research under different return of results scenarios and genetic discrimination concerns between groups, according to their demographic characteristics.

Results: A total of 57,331 KP members were invited to participate, and 10,369 completed the survey (18% response rate). Respondents were 65% female, 44% non-Hispanic White (NH White), 22% Asian/Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (Asian/PI), 19% non-Hispanic Black (NH Black), and 16% Hispanic. Respondents willing to participate in genetic research ranged from 22% with no results returned to 87% if health-related genetic results were returned. We also found variation by race/ethnicity; when no results were to be returned, Asian/PIs, Hispanics, and NH Blacks were less likely to want to participate than NH Whites (p < 0.05). However, when results were returned, disparities in the willingness to participate disappeared for NH Blacks and Hispanics. Genetic discrimination concerns were more prevalent in Asian/PIs, Hispanics, and NH Blacks than in NH Whites (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Policies that prohibit the return of results and do not address genetic discrimination concerns may contribute to a greater underrepresentation of diverse groups in genetic research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究相关基因检测结果的回归和基因歧视问题:不同群体参与基因研究的促进因素和障碍。
背景:大多数遗传学研究缺乏必要的多样性,以确保所有群体都能从遗传研究中受益。目的:探讨基因研究参与的促进因素和障碍。方法:于2017年11月15日至2018年2月28日,对受邀加入Kaiser Permanente (KP)生物库(KP research Bank)的成年会员进行研究和医疗保健遗传学调查。根据人口统计学特征,采用logistic回归计算校正比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci),比较不同结果回归情景下人群参与基因研究的意愿和基因歧视问题。结果:共有57,331名KP成员受邀参与,其中10,369人完成了调查(回复率为18%)。受访者中65%为女性,44%为非西班牙裔白人(NH White), 22%为亚洲/夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民(Asian/PI), 19%为非西班牙裔黑人(NH Black), 16%为西班牙裔。愿意参与基因研究的受访者从没有结果的22%到有健康相关基因结果的87%不等。我们还发现了种族/民族的差异;当没有结果返回时,亚洲/ pi,西班牙裔和NH黑人比NH白人更不愿意参与(p < 0.05)。然而,当结果返回时,参与意愿的差异在新罕布什尔州黑人和西班牙裔人中消失了。遗传歧视问题在亚洲/ pi、西班牙裔和NH黑人中比在NH白人中更为普遍(p < 0.05)。结论:禁止返回结果和不解决基因歧视问题的政策可能会导致基因研究中不同群体的代表性更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the impact of screen-sharing visual aids during genomic results disclosure via telehealth in diverse families in the TeleKidSeq pilot study. Adopting public health genomics when the house is on fire: How will we navigate to 2030? Modern Family: An Ethical Justification for System-Led Contact of Relatives Eligible for Cascade Screening in the United States. Variation Exists in Service Delivery: Similarities and Differences in the Provision of a Whole Genome Sequencing Service for Paediatric Rare Disease Patients in the National Health Service in England. Evaluating the Implementation of the Rapid Prenatal Exome Sequencing Service in England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1