Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predicted clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL European Journal of Clinical Investigation Pub Date : 2020-05-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-11 DOI:10.1111/eci.13230
Ya-Ling Yang, Cheng-Hsueh Wu, Pai-Feng Hsu, Su-Chan Chen, Shao-Sung Huang, Wan Leong Chan, Shing-Jong Lin, Chia-Yu Chou, Jaw-Wen Chen, Ju-Pin Pan, Min-Ji Charng, Ying-Hwa Chen, Tao-Cheng Wu, Tse-Min Lu, Po-Hsun Huang, Hao-Min Cheng, Chin-Chou Huang, Shih-Hsien Sung, Yenn-Jiang Lin, Hsin-Bang Leu
{"title":"Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predicted clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease.","authors":"Ya-Ling Yang,&nbsp;Cheng-Hsueh Wu,&nbsp;Pai-Feng Hsu,&nbsp;Su-Chan Chen,&nbsp;Shao-Sung Huang,&nbsp;Wan Leong Chan,&nbsp;Shing-Jong Lin,&nbsp;Chia-Yu Chou,&nbsp;Jaw-Wen Chen,&nbsp;Ju-Pin Pan,&nbsp;Min-Ji Charng,&nbsp;Ying-Hwa Chen,&nbsp;Tao-Cheng Wu,&nbsp;Tse-Min Lu,&nbsp;Po-Hsun Huang,&nbsp;Hao-Min Cheng,&nbsp;Chin-Chou Huang,&nbsp;Shih-Hsien Sung,&nbsp;Yenn-Jiang Lin,&nbsp;Hsin-Bang Leu","doi":"10.1111/eci.13230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines the predictive value of a novel systemic immune-inflammation index (SII, platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 5602 CAD patients who had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled. They were divided into two groups by baseline SII score (high SII vs low SII) to analyse the relationship between SII groups and the long-term outcome. The primary outcomes were major cardiovascular events (MACE) which includes nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke and cardiac death. Secondary outcomes included a composite of MACE and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An optimal SII cut-off point of 694.3 × 10<sup>9</sup> was identified for MACE in the CAD training cohort (n = 373) and then verified in the second larger CAD cohort (n = 5602). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that a higher SII score (≥694.3) was independently associated with increased risk of developing cardiac death (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.43-2.86), nonfatal MI (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.09-1.85), nonfatal stroke (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.28-2.99), MACE (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.36-2.01) and total major events (HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.32-1.77). In addition, the SII significantly improved risk stratification of MI, cardiac death, heart failure, MACE and total major events than conventional risk factors in CAD patients by the significant increase in the C-index (P < .001) and reclassification risk categories by significant NRI (P < .05) and IDI (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SII had a better prediction of major cardiovascular events than traditional risk factors in CAD patients after coronary intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":"50 5","pages":"e13230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/eci.13230","citationCount":"246","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13230","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 246

Abstract

Background: This study examines the predictive value of a novel systemic immune-inflammation index (SII, platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.

Methods: A total of 5602 CAD patients who had undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled. They were divided into two groups by baseline SII score (high SII vs low SII) to analyse the relationship between SII groups and the long-term outcome. The primary outcomes were major cardiovascular events (MACE) which includes nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke and cardiac death. Secondary outcomes included a composite of MACE and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.

Results: An optimal SII cut-off point of 694.3 × 109 was identified for MACE in the CAD training cohort (n = 373) and then verified in the second larger CAD cohort (n = 5602). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that a higher SII score (≥694.3) was independently associated with increased risk of developing cardiac death (HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.43-2.86), nonfatal MI (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.09-1.85), nonfatal stroke (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.28-2.99), MACE (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.36-2.01) and total major events (HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.32-1.77). In addition, the SII significantly improved risk stratification of MI, cardiac death, heart failure, MACE and total major events than conventional risk factors in CAD patients by the significant increase in the C-index (P < .001) and reclassification risk categories by significant NRI (P < .05) and IDI (P < .05).

Conclusions: SII had a better prediction of major cardiovascular events than traditional risk factors in CAD patients after coronary intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全身免疫炎症指数(SII)预测冠状动脉疾病患者的临床预后。
背景:本研究探讨了一种新的全身免疫炎症指数(SII,血小板×中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值)在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中的预测价值。方法:共纳入5602例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的冠心病患者。他们根据基线SII评分(高SII和低SII)分为两组,以分析SII组与长期结果之间的关系。主要结局为主要心血管事件(MACE),包括非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、非致死性卒中和心源性死亡。次要结果包括MACE和因充血性心力衰竭住院的综合结果。结果:在CAD训练队列(n = 373)中,确定了MACE的最佳SII分界点694.3 × 109,然后在第二个较大的CAD队列(n = 5602)中得到验证。单因素和多因素分析显示,较高的SII评分(≥694.3)与心源性死亡风险增加独立相关(HR: 2.02;95% CI: 1.43-2.86),非致死性心肌梗死(HR: 1.42;95% CI: 1.09-1.85),非致死性卒中(HR: 1.96;95% ci: 1.28-2.99),梅斯特(hr: 1.65;95% CI: 1.36-2.01)和总主要事件(HR: 1.53;95% ci: 1.32-1.77)。此外,SII通过显著提高冠心病患者的c指数(P),显著改善了冠心病患者心肌梗死、心源性死亡、心力衰竭、MACE和总主要事件的危险分层。结论:SII对冠心病患者冠状动脉介入治疗后主要心血管事件的预测优于传统危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Cellular senescence in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: From mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Reversing frailty: The transformative effects of structured physical-activity-based physiotherapy on physical, cognitive and emotional health in older adults-An evidence-based systematic review. HDL function and composition in atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease with very high HDL-C. Mapping Alzheimer's disease heterogeneity with molecular imaging biomarkers. Harnessing controlled human infection models to accelerate vaccine development for neglected tropical diseases: Lessons from leishmaniasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1