What Is Our "Epistemic Responsibility"? Reflections on Social Work's Orientation in Yoga Therapy Research.

Emmanuelle Larocque, Nicolas Moreau
{"title":"What Is Our \"Epistemic Responsibility\"? Reflections on Social Work's Orientation in Yoga Therapy Research.","authors":"Emmanuelle Larocque,&nbsp;Nicolas Moreau","doi":"10.17761/2020-D-19-00044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this article is to explore how the social work discipline could provide a complementary lens through which yoga therapy can be analyzed and evaluated by engaging in knowledge-creation practices and procedures that prioritize the \"epistemic responsibility\" described by philosopher Lorraine Code. More specifically, by seeking to strategically include often-subjugated types of knowledge and by focusing on redistributing epistemic power to agents that typically have been excluded from epistemic participation in contemporary yoga therapy research, the social work discipline, with its strong commitment to social justice, has the potential to contribute to filling an important gap in scientific literature. We begin by presenting the relevance of the social work perspective in relation to the field of yoga therapy. We next offer a reserved critical analysis of the dominant technical knowledge base that currently informs yoga therapy practice. This analysis highlights the social parameters that may be rendered invisible or left aside when adopting a positivist epistemological lens and justifies how the conceptual apparatus of epistemic responsibility serves as a potential platform for rethinking social work's position and future contributions to the field of yoga therapy. Finally, we mobilize the concept of cultural appropriation to illustrate how striving for epistemic responsibility provides an entry point for addressing the multilevel, complex social processes embedded in yoga therapy practice and research while aiming to capture the many voices-and hence the various truths-implicated in a democratic, reflexive, and inclusive research process.</p>","PeriodicalId":38682,"journal":{"name":"International journal of yoga therapy","volume":"30 1","pages":"103-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of yoga therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17761/2020-D-19-00044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore how the social work discipline could provide a complementary lens through which yoga therapy can be analyzed and evaluated by engaging in knowledge-creation practices and procedures that prioritize the "epistemic responsibility" described by philosopher Lorraine Code. More specifically, by seeking to strategically include often-subjugated types of knowledge and by focusing on redistributing epistemic power to agents that typically have been excluded from epistemic participation in contemporary yoga therapy research, the social work discipline, with its strong commitment to social justice, has the potential to contribute to filling an important gap in scientific literature. We begin by presenting the relevance of the social work perspective in relation to the field of yoga therapy. We next offer a reserved critical analysis of the dominant technical knowledge base that currently informs yoga therapy practice. This analysis highlights the social parameters that may be rendered invisible or left aside when adopting a positivist epistemological lens and justifies how the conceptual apparatus of epistemic responsibility serves as a potential platform for rethinking social work's position and future contributions to the field of yoga therapy. Finally, we mobilize the concept of cultural appropriation to illustrate how striving for epistemic responsibility provides an entry point for addressing the multilevel, complex social processes embedded in yoga therapy practice and research while aiming to capture the many voices-and hence the various truths-implicated in a democratic, reflexive, and inclusive research process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们的“认知责任”是什么?瑜伽治疗研究中社会工作定位的思考
本文的目的是探索社会工作学科如何提供一个补充的视角,通过参与知识创造实践和程序来分析和评估瑜伽疗法,这些实践和程序优先考虑哲学家洛林·科德(Lorraine Code)所描述的“认知责任”。更具体地说,通过寻求战略性地包括经常被征服的知识类型,并专注于将知识权力重新分配给那些通常被排除在当代瑜伽疗法研究知识参与之外的主体,社会工作学科以其对社会正义的坚定承诺,有可能为填补科学文献中的重要空白做出贡献。我们首先介绍与瑜伽治疗领域相关的社会工作视角。我们接下来提供了一个保留的关键分析的主要技术知识基础,目前通知瑜伽治疗实践。该分析强调了在采用实证主义认识论视角时可能被忽略或搁置的社会参数,并证明了认识论责任的概念装置如何作为重新思考社会工作的地位和未来对瑜伽治疗领域的贡献的潜在平台。最后,我们利用文化占有的概念来说明,努力追求认知责任如何为解决瑜伽疗法实践和研究中嵌入的多层次、复杂的社会过程提供了一个切入点,同时旨在捕捉民主、反思和包容性研究过程中涉及的许多声音,从而捕捉各种真理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of yoga therapy
International journal of yoga therapy Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Effect of 12 Weeks of Hatha Balance Flow Yoga on Fall and Injury Risk in Postmenopausal Women. Biofeedback Using Virtual Reality and Yoga Pranayama Modulates Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variability in People with and without Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries. Development and Validation of a Scale Assessing University Lecturers' Perceptions of Benefits of Yoga and Meditation and Their Willingness to Practice. Anthropometric Changes in Female Collegiate Athletes Apparent Within 4 Weeks of a Yoga Intervention. Effects of a Yoga-Based Program on Well-Being and Traumatic Stress: A Noncontrolled Trial in Rwanda, Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1